From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.5 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A29FAC433E0 for ; Tue, 9 Feb 2021 01:03:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ml01.01.org (ml01.01.org [198.145.21.10]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2D84C64E82 for ; Tue, 9 Feb 2021 01:03:42 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 2D84C64E82 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-nvdimm-bounces@lists.01.org Received: from ml01.vlan13.01.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ml01.01.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECB6C100EBBA2; Mon, 8 Feb 2021 17:03:41 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: Pass (mailfrom) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=2a00:1450:4864:20::536; helo=mail-ed1-x536.google.com; envelope-from=dan.j.williams@intel.com; receiver= Received: from mail-ed1-x536.google.com (mail-ed1-x536.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::536]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ml01.01.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 99570100EF26A for ; Mon, 8 Feb 2021 17:03:39 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-ed1-x536.google.com with SMTP id q2so21491973edi.4 for ; Mon, 08 Feb 2021 17:03:39 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=intel-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=fHdIpxdCQ1PLtC8RCv6m44jQdcXIE1TuMoRRkTZi7uE=; b=qwv0t5E5aZrjpce35wVglshp4JBxu39PIdgj4xdUOlLAEakgzg4b3FJbfq2HN/qqou 9LQfGzniImvjDNMBkBJnrX1ntP72ogrewjQ2gKYoCh1o/le4FRKVGjaJxv3rSN7ZZBGU ND29aEvm0jt1j7a3IPInOsXrIfqP/YDjyAHvbHVpAfIfge/RjtSbj3EMVgUml+GLtD8A s4+rSINdnXAV0Xh58nVxnqiimSO2mDtGL34UGKW0uyWIrbcD0eh7LweXk4UOOBJfHn1d k46kyxjQC6/FOxYghxGOEZpmpCQBxx/22/B4ofVC4Hm3q5GScDOeGmVhJc6rCD4ZEY91 XuRQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=fHdIpxdCQ1PLtC8RCv6m44jQdcXIE1TuMoRRkTZi7uE=; b=H1pdbwur2Jo289XMDWoQp6hyy+Eyyl8XFqRPgGuKWIf/9T6obL/IBFx2dHtgEPfe+2 gM0jT//ZJtGNKAtHd+AkwebKS95GzOmiwx6ZA/+s5yehVOtKM1zAkdC5pNSrf3+fZ1an wEgZZENo3hevmHiOfas3I1LsQoZbGKINuehjU9RN56nGpI/FuNOXBUZRi5ABqLPZk22y UDKgFaAOcyK3I6RXFzFZsFZlHxMjDYm39xyhNMWvXXm4e2TFYt+HE8mrLaahVPShhIUj yhJon+aKwNseMDd4xySzWfffwpCxzt5OnnqdQMdFYNAk7faY8Ti30RsWFBPvyW0ERI0F eWhg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533kj7J8jpXrOkYUJV8qU7DSqdTbzxCkHquF8umCcA2BQkQfdgFl 1ev4XIq2aVvQHOYCkk8UvqybyVVyW5lW2rlBDUVWMQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyHAry8BiQtZNtaMNiR4K/N57s8fu6tcUa4c1BcfO8uaRfbbIzg0j3uT3lLVTnBuEac7Ul2LjuJW6ltpn+onC0= X-Received: by 2002:aa7:ca13:: with SMTP id y19mr20091433eds.300.1612832617860; Mon, 08 Feb 2021 17:03:37 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20210130002438.1872527-1-ben.widawsky@intel.com> <20210130002438.1872527-9-ben.widawsky@intel.com> <202102081406.CDE33FB8@keescook> In-Reply-To: From: Dan Williams Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2021 17:03:25 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/14] taint: add taint for direct hardware access To: Kees Cook Message-ID-Hash: I6G33DCN74KV3X5UMTOPZX3XOKUX4BHY X-Message-ID-Hash: I6G33DCN74KV3X5UMTOPZX3XOKUX4BHY X-MailFrom: dan.j.williams@intel.com X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; suspicious-header CC: Jonathan Corbet , linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org, Ben Widawsky , Linux ACPI , Linux Kernel Mailing List , linux-nvdimm , Linux PCI , Bjorn Helgaas , Chris Browy , Jon Masters , Jonathan Cameron , Rafael Wysocki , Randy Dunlap , daniel.lll@alibaba-inc.com, "John Groves (jgroves)" , "Kelley, Sean V" X-Mailman-Version: 3.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: "Linux-nvdimm developer list." Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Mon, Feb 8, 2021 at 3:36 PM Dan Williams wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 8, 2021 at 2:09 PM Kees Cook wrote: > > > > On Mon, Feb 08, 2021 at 02:00:33PM -0800, Dan Williams wrote: > > > [ add Jon Corbet as I'd expect him to be Cc'd on anything that > > > generically touches Documentation/ like this, and add Kees as the last > > > person who added a taint (tag you're it) ] > > > > > > Jon, Kees, are either of you willing to ack this concept? > > > > > > Top-posting to add more context for the below: > > > > > > This taint is proposed because it has implications for > > > CONFIG_LOCK_DOWN_KERNEL among other things. These CXL devices > > > implement memory like DDR would, but unlike DDR there are > > > administrative / configuration commands that demand kernel > > > coordination before they can be sent. The posture taken with this > > > taint is "guilty until proven innocent" for commands that have yet to > > > be explicitly allowed by the driver. This is different than NVME for > > > example where an errant vendor-defined command could destroy data on > > > the device, but there is no wider threat to system integrity. The > > > taint allows a pressure release valve for any and all commands to be > > > sent, but flagged with WARN_TAINT_ONCE if the driver has not > > > explicitly enabled it on an allowed list of known-good / kernel > > > coordinated commands. > > > > > > On Fri, Jan 29, 2021 at 4:25 PM Ben Widawsky wrote: > > > > > > > > For drivers that moderate access to the underlying hardware it is > > > > sometimes desirable to allow userspace to bypass restrictions. Once > > > > userspace has done this, the driver can no longer guarantee the sanctity > > > > of either the OS or the hardware. When in this state, it is helpful for > > > > kernel developers to be made aware (via this taint flag) of this fact > > > > for subsequent bug reports. > > > > > > > > Example usage: > > > > - Hardware xyzzy accepts 2 commands, waldo and fred. > > > > - The xyzzy driver provides an interface for using waldo, but not fred. > > > > - quux is convinced they really need the fred command. > > > > - xyzzy driver allows quux to frob hardware to initiate fred. > > > > - kernel gets tainted. > > > > - turns out fred command is borked, and scribbles over memory. > > > > - developers laugh while closing quux's subsequent bug report. > > > > But a taint flag only lasts for the current boot. If this is a drive, it > > could still be compromised after reboot. It sounds like this taint is > > really only for ephemeral things? "vendor shenanigans" is a pretty giant > > scope ... > > > > That is true. This is more about preventing an ecosystem / cottage > industry of tooling built around bypassing the kernel. So the kernel > complains loudly and hopefully prevents vendor tooling from > propagating and instead directs that development effort back to the > native tooling. However for the rare "I know what I'm doing" cases, > this tainted kernel bypass lets some experimentation and debug happen, > but the kernel is transparent that when the capability ships in > production it needs to be a native implementation. > > So it's less, "the system integrity is compromised" and more like > "you're bypassing the development process that ensures sanity for CXL > implementations that may take down a system if implemented > incorrectly". For example, NVME reset is a non-invent, CXL reset can > be like surprise removing DDR DIMM. > > Should this be more tightly scoped to CXL? I had hoped to use this in > other places in LIBNVDIMM, but I'm ok to lose some generality for the > specific concerns that make CXL devices different than other PCI > endpoints. As I type this out it strikes me that plain WARN already does TAINT_WARN and meets the spirit of what is trying to be achieved. Appreciate the skeptical eye Kees, we'll drop this one. _______________________________________________ Linux-nvdimm mailing list -- linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org To unsubscribe send an email to linux-nvdimm-leave@lists.01.org