linux-nvdimm.lists.01.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
To: Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@intel.com>
Cc: linux-nvdimm <linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	Ben Olson <ben.olson@intel.com>,
	Michal Biesek <michal.biesek@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [ndctl PATCH 04/10] libdaxctl: add an API to determine if memory is movable
Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2019 11:54:44 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAPcyv4hb7vPbWhb3R5fyJH0H5OqRmhtVr=_D0tiYrkc_r8HpaQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191002234925.9190-5-vishal.l.verma@intel.com>

On Wed, Oct 2, 2019 at 4:49 PM Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@intel.com> wrote:
>
> By default, daxctl always attempts to online new memory sections as
> 'movable' so that routine kernel allocations aren't serviced from this
> memory, and the memory is later removable via hot-unplug.
>
> System configuration, or other agents (such as udev rules) may race
> 'daxctl' to online memory, and this may result in the memory not being
> 'movable'. Add an interface to query the movability of a memory object
> associated with a dax device.
>
> This is in preparation to both display a 'movable' attribute in device
> listings, as well as optionally allowing memory to be onlined as
> non-movable.
>
> Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
> Reported-by: Ben Olson <ben.olson@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@intel.com>
> ---
>  daxctl/lib/libdaxctl-private.h | 20 +++++++++
>  daxctl/lib/libdaxctl.c         | 77 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>  daxctl/lib/libdaxctl.sym       |  5 +++
>  daxctl/libdaxctl.h             |  1 +
>  4 files changed, 100 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/daxctl/lib/libdaxctl-private.h b/daxctl/lib/libdaxctl-private.h
> index 7ba3c46..82939bb 100644
> --- a/daxctl/lib/libdaxctl-private.h
> +++ b/daxctl/lib/libdaxctl-private.h
> @@ -44,6 +44,25 @@ enum memory_op {
>         MEM_SET_ONLINE,
>         MEM_IS_ONLINE,
>         MEM_COUNT,
> +       MEM_FIND_ZONE,

This is private so the naming is not too big a concern, but isn't this
a MEM_GET_ZONE? A find operation to me is something that can succeed
to find nothing, whereas a get operation fail assumes the association
can always be retrieved barring exceptional conditions.
_______________________________________________
Linux-nvdimm mailing list -- linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org
To unsubscribe send an email to linux-nvdimm-leave@lists.01.org

  reply	other threads:[~2019-10-18 18:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-10-02 23:49 [ndctl PATCH 00/10] fixes and movability for system-ram mode Vishal Verma
2019-10-02 23:49 ` [ndctl PATCH 01/10] libdaxctl: refactor path construction in op_for_one_memblock() Vishal Verma
2019-10-18 18:43   ` Dan Williams
2019-10-02 23:49 ` [ndctl PATCH 02/10] libdaxctl: refactor memblock_is_online() checks Vishal Verma
2019-10-18 18:45   ` Dan Williams
2019-10-02 23:49 ` [ndctl PATCH 03/10] daxctl/device.c: fix json output omission for reconfigure-device Vishal Verma
2019-10-18 18:46   ` Dan Williams
2019-10-02 23:49 ` [ndctl PATCH 04/10] libdaxctl: add an API to determine if memory is movable Vishal Verma
2019-10-18 18:54   ` Dan Williams [this message]
2019-10-18 19:57     ` Verma, Vishal L
2019-10-18 20:40       ` Dan Williams
2019-10-02 23:49 ` [ndctl PATCH 05/10] libdaxctl: allow memblock_in_dev() to return an error Vishal Verma
2019-10-18 19:15   ` Dan Williams
2019-10-02 23:49 ` [ndctl PATCH 06/10] daxctl: show a 'movable' attribute in device listings Vishal Verma
2019-10-18 19:16   ` Dan Williams
2019-10-02 23:49 ` [ndctl PATCH 07/10] daxctl: detect races when onlining memory blocks Vishal Verma
2019-10-18 19:26   ` Dan Williams
2019-10-02 23:49 ` [ndctl PATCH 08/10] Documentation: clarify memory movablity for reconfigure-device Vishal Verma
2019-10-18 20:46   ` Dan Williams
2019-10-18 20:50     ` Verma, Vishal L
2019-10-02 23:49 ` [ndctl PATCH 09/10] libdaxctl: add an API to online memory in a non-movable state Vishal Verma
2019-10-18 20:54   ` Dan Williams
2019-10-02 23:49 ` [ndctl PATCH 10/10] daxctl: add --no-movable option for onlining memory Vishal Verma
2019-10-18 20:58   ` Dan Williams
2019-10-18 21:04     ` Verma, Vishal L
2019-10-18 21:25       ` Dan Williams

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAPcyv4hb7vPbWhb3R5fyJH0H5OqRmhtVr=_D0tiYrkc_r8HpaQ@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=ben.olson@intel.com \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org \
    --cc=michal.biesek@intel.com \
    --cc=vishal.l.verma@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).