From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76B6FC4CEC5 for ; Fri, 13 Sep 2019 15:00:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ml01.01.org (ml01.01.org [198.145.21.10]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FF6820830 for ; Fri, 13 Sep 2019 15:00:48 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=infradead.org header.i=@infradead.org header.b="rhcGyriU" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 4FF6820830 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=infradead.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-nvdimm-bounces@lists.01.org Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ml01.01.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6FC9202EA3E4; Fri, 13 Sep 2019 08:00:41 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: None (no SPF record) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=2607:7c80:54:e::133; helo=bombadil.infradead.org; envelope-from=rdunlap@infradead.org; receiver=linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [IPv6:2607:7c80:54:e::133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ml01.01.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 33563202E290B for ; Fri, 13 Sep 2019 08:00:40 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:From:References:Cc:To: Subject:Sender:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id: List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=/rrOO5cRfnuT0HPH0sG11kpD8hb/EFmQkUJiAynpSfI=; b=rhcGyriUGdM0uLIxwPsUds2QT t+M0Zs7sOBv6zqYYMm7GBfHI8C5o8Wn19/FCGzhLLfkakZqlASZkCnoNm1ElzdSTNHs5DJzfwQ0S/ sAs15ESalJ9S2r2ftIZc8Y1T0YZ7pzRl8jxQVlMibUStwIfn91AVf+5NKl5l7qv72VxeDZGsgOok7 UXm4bOQOokOzPjF9h+WMsBoTJUBRU+L78K5hAPL1I7FPhBnPzhNxbdWzQR5XXLAUcuCyAJOHLffEI p9Ovn+qpuOdt1PbCis4hoqBgSJre4ax2VCiIp/Ev1VjI9J3m/zLiVwnWY9LsF49wzYWf4M6kKbVmv oNAcnnchg==; Received: from c-73-157-219-8.hsd1.or.comcast.net ([73.157.219.8] helo=[10.0.0.252]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtpsa (Exim 4.92.2 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1i8n3z-0006Au-6N; Fri, 13 Sep 2019 15:00:43 +0000 Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [PATCH v2 3/3] libnvdimm, MAINTAINERS: Maintainer Entry Profile To: Dan Carpenter , Jonathan Corbet References: <156821692280.2951081.18036584954940423225.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com> <156821693963.2951081.11214256396118531359.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com> <20190911184332.GL20699@kadam> <9132e214-9b57-07dc-7ee2-f6bc52e960c5@kernel.dk> <20190913010937.7fc20d93@lwn.net> <20190913114849.GP20699@kadam> From: Randy Dunlap Message-ID: Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2019 08:00:42 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20190913114849.GP20699@kadam> Content-Language: en-US X-BeenThere: linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Linux-nvdimm developer list." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org, linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: linux-nvdimm-bounces@lists.01.org Sender: "Linux-nvdimm" On 9/13/19 4:48 AM, Dan Carpenter wrote: >> So I'm expecting to take this kind of stuff into Documentation/. My own >> personal hope is that it can maybe serve to shame some of these "local >> quirks" out of existence. The evidence from this brief discussion suggests >> that this might indeed happen. > > I don't think it's shaming, I think it's validating. Everyone just > insists that since it's written in the Book of Rules then it's our fault > for not reading it. It's like those EULA things where there is more > text than anyone can physically read in a life time. Yes, agreed. > And the documentation doesn't help. For example, I knew people's rules > about capitalizing the subject but I'd just forget. I say that if you > can't be bothered to add it to checkpatch then it means you don't really > care that strongly. If a subsystem requires a certain spelling/capitalization in patch email subjects, it should be added to MAINTAINERS IMO. E.g., E: NuBus -- ~Randy _______________________________________________ Linux-nvdimm mailing list Linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-nvdimm