From: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
To: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com>,
linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org, dan.j.williams@intel.com,
"Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>,
Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/pmem: Avoid inserting hugepage PTE entry with fsdax if hugepage support is disabled
Date: Fri, 5 Feb 2021 09:29:40 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ee1bfaf9-88a3-1d3f-0af9-36cc75f957bb@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210205023956.417587-1-aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com>
On 05.02.21 03:39, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
> Differentiate between hardware not supporting hugepages and user disabling THP
> via 'echo never > /sys/kernel/mm/transparent_hugepage/enabled'
>
> For the devdax namespace, the kernel handles the above via the
> supported_alignment attribute and failing to initialize the namespace
> if the namespace align value is not supported on the platform.
>
> For the fsdax namespace, the kernel will continue to initialize
> the namespace. This can result in the kernel creating a huge pte
> entry even though the hardware don't support the same.
>
> We do want hugepage support with pmem even if the end-user disabled THP
> via sysfs file (/sys/kernel/mm/transparent_hugepage/enabled). Hence
> differentiate between hardware/firmware lacking support vs user-controlled
> disable of THP and prevent a huge fault if the hardware lacks hugepage
> support.
>
> Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
> include/linux/huge_mm.h | 15 +++++++++------
> mm/huge_memory.c | 6 +++++-
> 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/huge_mm.h b/include/linux/huge_mm.h
> index 6a19f35f836b..ba973efcd369 100644
> --- a/include/linux/huge_mm.h
> +++ b/include/linux/huge_mm.h
> @@ -78,6 +78,7 @@ static inline vm_fault_t vmf_insert_pfn_pud(struct vm_fault *vmf, pfn_t pfn,
> }
>
> enum transparent_hugepage_flag {
> + TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE_NEVER_DAX,
> TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE_FLAG,
> TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE_REQ_MADV_FLAG,
> TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE_DEFRAG_DIRECT_FLAG,
> @@ -123,6 +124,13 @@ extern unsigned long transparent_hugepage_flags;
> */
> static inline bool __transparent_hugepage_enabled(struct vm_area_struct *vma)
> {
> +
> + /*
> + * If the hardware/firmware marked hugepage support disabled.
> + */
> + if (transparent_hugepage_flags & (1 << TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE_NEVER_DAX))
> + return false;
> +
> if (vma->vm_flags & VM_NOHUGEPAGE)
> return false;
>
> @@ -134,12 +142,7 @@ static inline bool __transparent_hugepage_enabled(struct vm_area_struct *vma)
>
> if (transparent_hugepage_flags & (1 << TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE_FLAG))
> return true;
> - /*
> - * For dax vmas, try to always use hugepage mappings. If the kernel does
> - * not support hugepages, fsdax mappings will fallback to PAGE_SIZE
> - * mappings, and device-dax namespaces, that try to guarantee a given
> - * mapping size, will fail to enable
> - */
> +
> if (vma_is_dax(vma))
> return true;
>
> diff --git a/mm/huge_memory.c b/mm/huge_memory.c
> index 9237976abe72..d698b7e27447 100644
> --- a/mm/huge_memory.c
> +++ b/mm/huge_memory.c
> @@ -386,7 +386,11 @@ static int __init hugepage_init(void)
> struct kobject *hugepage_kobj;
>
> if (!has_transparent_hugepage()) {
> - transparent_hugepage_flags = 0;
> + /*
> + * Hardware doesn't support hugepages, hence disable
> + * DAX PMD support.
> + */
> + transparent_hugepage_flags = 1 << TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE_NEVER_DAX;
> return -EINVAL;
> }
>
>
Looks sane to me from my limited understanding of that code :)
--
Thanks,
David / dhildenb
_______________________________________________
Linux-nvdimm mailing list -- linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org
To unsubscribe send an email to linux-nvdimm-leave@lists.01.org
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-02-05 8:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-02-05 2:39 [PATCH] mm/pmem: Avoid inserting hugepage PTE entry with fsdax if hugepage support is disabled Aneesh Kumar K.V
2021-02-05 8:29 ` David Hildenbrand [this message]
2021-02-05 17:47 ` Dan Williams
2021-02-10 5:18 ` Pankaj Gupta
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ee1bfaf9-88a3-1d3f-0af9-36cc75f957bb@redhat.com \
--to=david@redhat.com \
--cc=aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).