From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <SRS0=hxna=4J=lists.01.org=linux-nvdimm-bounces@kernel.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on
	aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.6 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED,
	HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,
	URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0
Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99])
	by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7DFDC3566F
	for <linux-nvdimm@archiver.kernel.org>; Fri, 21 Feb 2020 21:34:06 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from ml01.01.org (ml01.01.org [198.145.21.10])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7DD0B24653
	for <linux-nvdimm@archiver.kernel.org>; Fri, 21 Feb 2020 21:34:06 +0000 (UTC)
Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org;
	dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="TmBLJDSm"
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 7DD0B24653
Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com
Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-nvdimm-bounces@lists.01.org
Received: from ml01.vlan13.01.org (localhost [IPv6:::1])
	by ml01.01.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9092A10FC317E;
	Fri, 21 Feb 2020 13:34:58 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: Pass (mailfrom) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=207.211.31.81; helo=us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com; envelope-from=jmoyer@redhat.com; receiver=<UNKNOWN> 
Received: from us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com (us-smtp-1.mimecast.com [207.211.31.81])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by ml01.01.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6F83C1007B1EA
	for <linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org>; Fri, 21 Feb 2020 13:34:55 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com;
	s=mimecast20190719; t=1582320842;
	h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id:
	 to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type:
	 in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references;
	bh=AE85XWtWsi6tOM06pCMH0Q1Jbd3MvrBhMiJghYd0Kfk=;
	b=TmBLJDSmf70kSkDzioEBBhNKP1lXn4s+/Jx61TY/HPU9KZ/+XkAi5m1lAekP7miGVq47pd
	THfmNSPrhYdWvgxdakuYk/FqkqiQF148NYYtj+8U+gG4su3Jnqni/FJH0Oh9c5u52ep1zP
	IQI6rp95lDEA+KVLPrnDBB/I8Fs27xo=
Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com
 [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id
 us-mta-485-1XR95YiTMcuW5tTVBdDbzw-1; Fri, 21 Feb 2020 16:33:59 -0500
X-MC-Unique: 1XR95YiTMcuW5tTVBdDbzw-1
Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx03.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.13])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 75EFB8018A9;
	Fri, 21 Feb 2020 21:33:58 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from segfault.boston.devel.redhat.com (segfault.boston.devel.redhat.com [10.19.60.26])
	by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D83279053D;
	Fri, 21 Feb 2020 21:33:52 +0000 (UTC)
From: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@redhat.com>
To: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/8] drivers/pmem: Allow pmem_clear_poison() to accept arbitrary offset and len
References: <20200218214841.10076-1-vgoyal@redhat.com>
	<20200218214841.10076-3-vgoyal@redhat.com>
	<x49lfoxj622.fsf@segfault.boston.devel.redhat.com>
	<20200220215707.GC10816@redhat.com>
	<x498skv3i5r.fsf@segfault.boston.devel.redhat.com>
	<20200221201759.GF25974@redhat.com>
	<CAPcyv4j3BPGvrhuVaQZgvZ0i+M+i-Ab0BH+mAjR_aZzu4_kidQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<20200221212449.GG25974@redhat.com>
	<CAPcyv4gBHuTDW1M-3W=0nuH1v3whChb8TAK1aA0gosBSKpkqcg@mail.gmail.com>
X-PGP-KeyID: 1F78E1B4
X-PGP-CertKey: F6FE 280D 8293 F72C 65FD  5A58 1FF8 A7CA 1F78 E1B4
Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2020 16:33:52 -0500
In-Reply-To: <CAPcyv4gBHuTDW1M-3W=0nuH1v3whChb8TAK1aA0gosBSKpkqcg@mail.gmail.com>
	(Dan Williams's message of "Fri, 21 Feb 2020 13:30:56 -0800")
Message-ID: <x49o8tr1v7j.fsf@segfault.boston.devel.redhat.com>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.1 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.13
Message-ID-Hash: AFBEAF72UJ6RRHMFRJJQ3BTRDDKWOODF
X-Message-ID-Hash: AFBEAF72UJ6RRHMFRJJQ3BTRDDKWOODF
X-MailFrom: jmoyer@redhat.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; suspicious-header
CC: linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>, linux-nvdimm <linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>, device-mapper development <dm-devel@redhat.com>
X-Mailman-Version: 3.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Linux-nvdimm developer list." <linux-nvdimm.lists.01.org>
Archived-At: <https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org/message/AFBEAF72UJ6RRHMFRJJQ3BTRDDKWOODF/>
List-Archive: <https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org/>
List-Help: <mailto:linux-nvdimm-request@lists.01.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:linux-nvdimm-join@lists.01.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:linux-nvdimm-leave@lists.01.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> writes:

> Oh you misunderstood my comment, the "move badblocks to filesystem"
> proposal is long term / down the road thing to consider. In the near
> term this unaligned block zeroing facility is an improvement.

I'm not sure I agree.  I'm going to think about it and get back to you.

-Jeff
_______________________________________________
Linux-nvdimm mailing list -- linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org
To unsubscribe send an email to linux-nvdimm-leave@lists.01.org