Re: [ndctl RFC PATCH] ndctl/namespace: create namespaces greedily

[Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@redhat.com>]

Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@intel.com> writes:

> When a --region=all option is supplied to ndctl-create-namespace, it
> happily ignores it, since create-namespace has historically only created
> one namespace per invocation.
>
> This can be cumbersome, so change create-namespace to create namespaces
> greedily. When --region=all is specified, or if a --region option is
> absent (same as 'all' from a filtering standpoint), create namespaces on
> all regions.

Cumbersome?  Like, in the same way partitioning a disk is cumbersome?  I
don't understand what the problem is, I guess.  If you want N namespaces
of the same type/size/align, then script it.  Why does there have to be
a command for that?  I definitely think that changing the behavior of
create-namespace is a non-starter.

Cheers,
Jeff

>
> Note that this does has two important implications:
>
> 1. The user-facing behavior of create-namespace changes in a potentially
> surprising way. It may be undesirable for an unadorned 'ndctl
> create-namespace' command to suddenly start creating lots of namespaces.
>
> 2. Error handling becomes a bit inconsistent. As with all commands
> accepting an 'all' option, error reporting becomes a bit tenuous. With
> this change, we will continue to create namespaces so long as we don't
> hit an error, but if we do, we bail and exit. Because of the special
> ENOSPC detection and handling around this, it can be easy to construct a
> scenario where en existing namespace on the last region in the scan list
> happens to report an error exit, but if the existing namespace was in a
> region at the start of the scan list, it gets passed over as a "just try
> the next region"
>
> RFC comment: Maybe the solution is to keep the create-namespace
> semantics unchanged, and introduce a new command - 'create-namespaces'
> or 'create-names-ace-greedy' with the new behavior. I'm not sure if
> users will care deeply about either of the two points above, hence
> sending this as an RFC.
>
> Link: https://github.com/pmem/ndctl/issues/106
> Reported-by: Steve Scargal <steve.scargall@intel.com>
> Cc: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@redhat.com>
> Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@intel.com>
> ---
>  ndctl/namespace.c | 11 ++++++++---
>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/ndctl/namespace.c b/ndctl/namespace.c
> index af20a42..856ad82 100644
> --- a/ndctl/namespace.c
> +++ b/ndctl/namespace.c
> @@ -1365,9 +1365,12 @@ static int do_xaction_namespace(const char *namespace,
>  				rc = namespace_create(region);
>  				if (rc == -EAGAIN)
>  					continue;
> -				if (rc == 0)
> -					*processed = 1;
> -				return rc;
> +				if (rc == 0) {
> +					(*processed)++;
> +					continue;
> +				} else {
> +					return rc;
> +				}
>  			}
>  			ndctl_namespace_foreach_safe(region, ndns, _n) {
>  				ndns_name = ndctl_namespace_get_devname(ndns);
> @@ -1487,6 +1490,8 @@ int cmd_create_namespace(int argc, const char **argv, struct ndctl_ctx *ctx)
>  		rc = do_xaction_namespace(NULL, ACTION_CREATE, ctx, &created);
>  	}
>  
> +	fprintf(stderr, "created %d namespace%s\n", created,
> +			created == 1 ? "" : "s");
>  	if (rc < 0 || (!namespace && created < 1)) {
>  		fprintf(stderr, "failed to %s namespace: %s\n", namespace
>  				? "reconfigure" : "create", strerror(-rc));
_______________________________________________
Linux-nvdimm mailing list
Linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org
https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-nvdimm