From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.6 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A7F8ECE587 for ; Tue, 1 Oct 2019 18:18:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ml01.01.org (ml01.01.org [198.145.21.10]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 215A9215EA for ; Tue, 1 Oct 2019 18:18:12 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=oracle.com header.i=@oracle.com header.b="WRt6b4jK" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 215A9215EA Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=oracle.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-nvdimm-bounces@lists.01.org Received: from new-ml01.vlan13.01.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ml01.01.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0611410FC7202; Tue, 1 Oct 2019 11:19:39 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: Pass (mailfrom) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=141.146.126.78; helo=aserp2120.oracle.com; envelope-from=martin.petersen@oracle.com; receiver= Received: from aserp2120.oracle.com (aserp2120.oracle.com [141.146.126.78]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ml01.01.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2787E10FC71F3 for ; Tue, 1 Oct 2019 11:19:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pps.filterd (aserp2120.oracle.com [127.0.0.1]) by aserp2120.oracle.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id x91IDC6I090361; Tue, 1 Oct 2019 18:17:53 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=oracle.com; h=to : cc : subject : from : references : date : in-reply-to : message-id : mime-version : content-type; s=corp-2019-08-05; bh=wq9wrgNUITTrwjzKGMvvggax4gHnlKlrBnSxXFjscBc=; b=WRt6b4jK4tblC9ReI2WzrIthKeVlpi8iJwvLXInQ1AYW2AHlgT5SbD/pn/C/fwBRyQtl HpQgbfYX+Fz3e1PQ6Kb6WDnXsDabD5nPsj7J8wBd0441MBllnoNcGFZY4A55qGs4bY2o 1ue6yg+Ucs4gAD/0ohwViaryUrUKa9TDT1axhJSUcrfqa+JJU8S5wDxEQVjRmyLAG8iU pRBPBrslzJW/gnLzSmvrkLpkLALi4tnu27RyCekoFrN1dByfhHc8fjU0ntliufe4WbjO BmMI5it+w+KwyhMqMyoOsxuqiPp9eqEPNrNiOjzjlpI+vKrpAN352CG+MBn96ove1qni mw== Received: from aserp3020.oracle.com (aserp3020.oracle.com [141.146.126.70]) by aserp2120.oracle.com with ESMTP id 2v9yfq7xv5-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 01 Oct 2019 18:17:53 +0000 Received: from pps.filterd (aserp3020.oracle.com [127.0.0.1]) by aserp3020.oracle.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id x91I8H3l079821; Tue, 1 Oct 2019 18:17:52 GMT Received: from aserv0121.oracle.com (aserv0121.oracle.com [141.146.126.235]) by aserp3020.oracle.com with ESMTP id 2vbqd1a86x-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 01 Oct 2019 18:17:52 +0000 Received: from abhmp0008.oracle.com (abhmp0008.oracle.com [141.146.116.14]) by aserv0121.oracle.com (8.14.4/8.13.8) with ESMTP id x91IHhs8012803; Tue, 1 Oct 2019 18:17:43 GMT Received: from ca-mkp.ca.oracle.com (/10.159.214.123) by default (Oracle Beehive Gateway v4.0) with ESMTP ; Tue, 01 Oct 2019 11:17:43 -0700 To: Jonathan Corbet Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] Maintainer Handbook: Maintainer Entry Profile From: "Martin K. Petersen" Organization: Oracle Corporation References: <156821692280.2951081.18036584954940423225.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com> <156821693396.2951081.7340292149329436920.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com> <20191001075559.629eb059@lwn.net> Date: Tue, 01 Oct 2019 14:17:39 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20191001075559.629eb059@lwn.net> (Jonathan Corbet's message of "Tue, 1 Oct 2019 07:55:59 -0600") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.1.92 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=nai engine=6000 definitions=9397 signatures=668685 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 suspectscore=0 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 mlxscore=0 mlxlogscore=866 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1908290000 definitions=main-1910010147 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=nai engine=6000 definitions=9397 signatures=668685 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=943 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1908290000 definitions=main-1910010147 Message-ID-Hash: XVZHWBIQU3CIQGIRNSHI566VGDAKFGC2 X-Message-ID-Hash: XVZHWBIQU3CIQGIRNSHI566VGDAKFGC2 X-MailFrom: martin.petersen@oracle.com X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; suspicious-header CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner , Mauro Carvalho Chehab , Steve French , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Linus Torvalds , "Tobin C. Harding" , Olof Johansson , Daniel Vetter , Joe Perches , Dmitry Vyukov , Alexandre Belloni , linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org, ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 3.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: "Linux-nvdimm developer list." Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Jonathan, > Thus far, the maintainer guide is focused on how to *be* a maintainer. > This document, instead, is more about how to deal with specific > maintainers. So I suspect that Documentation/maintainer might be the > wrong place for it. > > Should we maybe place it instead under Documentation/process, or even > create a new top-level "book" for this information? I think Documentation/process is the right place for all the common practices and guidelines for code submission. Documentation is already pretty big. And based on the discussions in this thread, I think we're better off enhancing the existing process documents instead of introducing more places for people to look. -- Martin K. Petersen Oracle Linux Engineering _______________________________________________ Linux-nvdimm mailing list -- linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org To unsubscribe send an email to linux-nvdimm-leave@lists.01.org