From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
To: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>, Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.com>,
Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Long Li <longli@microsoft.com>,
John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org,
Keith Busch <keith.busch@intel.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] softirq: implement IRQ flood detection mechanism
Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2019 15:28:49 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190903072848.GA22170@ming.t460p> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6b88719c-782a-4a63-db9f-bf62734a7874@linaro.org>
On Tue, Sep 03, 2019 at 08:40:35AM +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> On 03/09/2019 08:31, Ming Lei wrote:
> > Hi Daniel,
> >
> > On Tue, Sep 03, 2019 at 07:59:39AM +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi Ming Lei,
> >>
> >> On 03/09/2019 05:30, Ming Lei wrote:
> >>
> >> [ ... ]
> >>
> >>
> >>>>> 2) irq/timing doesn't cover softirq
> >>>>
> >>>> That's solvable, right?
> >>>
> >>> Yeah, we can extend irq/timing, but ugly for irq/timing, since irq/timing
> >>> focuses on hardirq predication, and softirq isn't involved in that
> >>> purpose.
> >>>
> >>>>
> >>>>> Daniel, could you take a look and see if irq flood detection can be
> >>>>> implemented easily by irq/timing.c?
> >>>>
> >>>> I assume you can take a look as well, right?
> >>>
> >>> Yeah, I have looked at the code for a while, but I think that irq/timing
> >>> could become complicated unnecessarily for covering irq flood detection,
> >>> meantime it is much less efficient for detecting IRQ flood.
> >>
> >> In the series, there is nothing describing rigorously the problem (I can
> >> only guess) and why the proposed solution solves it.
> >>
> >> What is your definition of an 'irq flood'? A high irq load? An irq
> >> arriving while we are processing the previous one in the bottom halves?
> >
> > So far, it means that handling interrupt & softirq takes all utilization
> > of one CPU, then processes can't be run on this CPU basically, usually
> > sort of CPU lockup warning will be triggered.
>
> It is a scheduler problem then ?
Scheduler can do nothing if the CPU is taken completely by handling
interrupt & softirq, so seems not a scheduler problem, IMO.
Thanks,
Ming
_______________________________________________
Linux-nvme mailing list
Linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-nvme
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-09-03 7:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20190827085344.30799-1-ming.lei@redhat.com>
[not found] ` <20190827085344.30799-2-ming.lei@redhat.com>
[not found] ` <alpine.DEB.2.21.1908271633450.1939@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
[not found] ` <20190827225827.GA5263@ming.t460p>
[not found] ` <alpine.DEB.2.21.1908280104330.1939@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
[not found] ` <20190828110633.GC15524@ming.t460p>
[not found] ` <alpine.DEB.2.21.1908281316230.1869@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
[not found] ` <20190828135054.GA23861@ming.t460p>
[not found] ` <alpine.DEB.2.21.1908281605190.23149@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
2019-09-03 3:30 ` [PATCH 1/4] softirq: implement IRQ flood detection mechanism Ming Lei
2019-09-03 5:59 ` Daniel Lezcano
2019-09-03 6:31 ` Ming Lei
2019-09-03 6:40 ` Daniel Lezcano
2019-09-03 7:28 ` Ming Lei [this message]
2019-09-03 7:50 ` Daniel Lezcano
2019-09-03 9:30 ` Ming Lei
2019-09-04 17:07 ` Bart Van Assche
2019-09-04 17:31 ` Daniel Lezcano
2019-09-04 17:38 ` Bart Van Assche
2019-09-04 18:02 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-09-04 19:47 ` Bart Van Assche
2019-09-05 9:11 ` Ming Lei
2019-09-05 9:06 ` Ming Lei
2019-09-05 10:37 ` Daniel Lezcano
2019-09-06 1:22 ` Long Li
2019-09-06 4:36 ` Daniel Lezcano
2019-09-06 4:44 ` Long Li
2019-09-06 1:48 ` Ming Lei
2019-09-06 5:14 ` Daniel Lezcano
2019-09-06 18:30 ` Sagi Grimberg
2019-09-06 18:52 ` Keith Busch
2019-09-07 0:01 ` Ming Lei
2019-09-10 3:10 ` Sagi Grimberg
2019-09-18 0:00 ` Long Li
2019-09-20 17:14 ` Sagi Grimberg
2019-09-20 19:12 ` Long Li
2019-09-20 20:45 ` Sagi Grimberg
2019-09-24 0:57 ` Long Li
2019-09-18 14:37 ` Ming Lei
2019-09-20 17:09 ` Sagi Grimberg
2019-09-06 14:18 ` Keith Busch
2019-09-06 17:50 ` Long Li
2019-09-06 22:19 ` Ming Lei
2019-09-06 22:25 ` Keith Busch
2019-09-06 23:13 ` Ming Lei
2019-09-10 0:24 ` Ming Lei
2019-09-03 8:09 ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-09-03 9:24 ` Ming Lei
[not found] ` <20190827085344.30799-5-ming.lei@redhat.com>
2019-09-06 8:50 ` [PATCH 4/4] genirq: use irq's affinity for threaded irq with IRQF_RESCUE_THREAD John Garry
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190903072848.GA22170@ming.t460p \
--to=ming.lei@redhat.com \
--cc=axboe@fb.com \
--cc=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
--cc=hare@suse.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=john.garry@huawei.com \
--cc=keith.busch@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=longli@microsoft.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).