From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>
Cc: Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>,
James Smart <james.smart@broadcom.com>,
linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org,
Edmund Nadolski <edmund.nadolski@intel.com>,
Judy Brock <judy.brock@samsung.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv3 5/5] nvme: Wait for reset state when required
Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2019 18:18:47 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191010161847.GA1942@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191010160527.22376-6-kbusch@kernel.org>
> +int nvme_reset_schedule(struct nvme_ctrl *ctrl)
> {
> if (ctrl->state != NVME_CTRL_RESETTING)
> return -EBUSY;
> @@ -133,6 +133,7 @@ static int nvme_reset_schedule(struct nvme_ctrl *ctrl)
> return -EBUSY;
> return 0;
> }
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(nvme_reset_schedule);
Oh well, forgot we grow more users later. The naming of the thing
still puzlles me, though. Maybe something like nvme_schedule_reset_work
is a little better? Not that I'm fully happy with that either.
> static void nvme_reset_done(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> {
> struct nvme_dev *dev = pci_get_drvdata(pdev);
> - nvme_reset_ctrl_sync(&dev->ctrl);
> +
> + if (!nvme_reset_schedule(&dev->ctrl))
> + flush_work(&dev->ctrl.reset_work);
Do we need a comment on the flush?
_______________________________________________
Linux-nvme mailing list
Linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-nvme
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-10-10 16:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-10-10 16:05 [PATCHv3 0/5] nvme: double reset prevention Keith Busch
2019-10-10 16:05 ` [PATCHv3 1/5] nvme-pci: Free tagset if no IO queues Keith Busch
2019-10-10 16:05 ` [PATCHv3 2/5] nvme: Remove ADMIN_ONLY state Keith Busch
2019-10-10 16:05 ` [PATCHv3 3/5] nvme: Restart request timers in resetting state Keith Busch
2019-10-10 16:05 ` [PATCHv3 4/5] nvme: Prevent resets during paused controller state Keith Busch
2019-10-10 16:09 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-10-10 16:17 ` Keith Busch
2019-10-10 16:05 ` [PATCHv3 5/5] nvme: Wait for reset state when required Keith Busch
2019-10-10 16:18 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2019-10-10 16:30 ` Keith Busch
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20191010161847.GA1942@lst.de \
--to=hch@lst.de \
--cc=edmund.nadolski@intel.com \
--cc=james.smart@broadcom.com \
--cc=judy.brock@samsung.com \
--cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).