From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45EB2C4CECE for ; Mon, 14 Oct 2019 07:07:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1C76C207FF for ; Mon, 14 Oct 2019 07:07:33 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="kkK6G0ir" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 1C76C207FF Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=lst.de Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-nvme-bounces+linux-nvme=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=aWp9T7WT2FEqd+K8EghcyXRjh3hLVNnDZS5yob7QG4Y=; b=kkK6G0irpwIgWv 5J4L/A3l/JYvwP+Lcz4SBfW7bb5KCCgjxIxWV+i4dAWCX+CsNSfOdvBEUR8fKkWgx4u85NMKbyIht WgnSk1EJcOOreTeaeWDX11NZHPNAVPN54nCKOP40lFsSeUtW+yPHuWcJ3EzGBr8lnFRgBoh0A/gpO zbRWk14pjpUZPt+OibYwFiwW1zENYTMAXTUaXtyT5BifYjaAmjh0tG6sbNkZjvghbAIRrHhkwNlgU kJXvdR51P0e7RjdFRBmBm+B8+8W7bjH4cPcapPBy/awxpDMZCnOXYQJW7Iuo8AeOXeWgFOTbAfy8P 3LCEN7uvH6QJpJsntZ9w==; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1iJuRw-0003BB-To; Mon, 14 Oct 2019 07:07:24 +0000 Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.211]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1iJuRu-0003AX-B5 for linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 14 Oct 2019 07:07:23 +0000 Received: by verein.lst.de (Postfix, from userid 2407) id C357668CF0; Mon, 14 Oct 2019 09:07:14 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2019 09:07:14 +0200 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Max Gurtovoy Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/8] small NVMe cleanups/fixes Message-ID: <20191014070714.GA10054@lst.de> References: <1570985858-26805-1-git-send-email-maxg@mellanox.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1570985858-26805-1-git-send-email-maxg@mellanox.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20191014_000722_529294_BD9D5505 X-CRM114-Status: UNSURE ( 9.21 ) X-CRM114-Notice: Please train this message. X-BeenThere: linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: sagi@grimberg.me, israelr@mellanox.com, james.smart@broadcom.com, linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, shlomin@mellanox.com, kbusch@kernel.org, hch@lst.de Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "Linux-nvme" Errors-To: linux-nvme-bounces+linux-nvme=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Sun, Oct 13, 2019 at 07:57:30PM +0300, Max Gurtovoy wrote: > Hi Sagi/Christoph/Keith, > This series include few fast-path and code readability improvements from > IsraelR and also few memleak fixes and new status code introduction from > myself. I'm not fully sold on the unlikely annotations, but then again don't have a strong argument against them either. Otherwise this looks good to me Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig > > This series applies cleanly on top of nvme-5.4 branch, commit 3a8ecc935efab > ("nvme: retain split access workaround for capability reads") Keith has started a 5.5 branch in the meantime, but there shouldn't be major conflicts as far as I can see. _______________________________________________ Linux-nvme mailing list Linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-nvme