From: Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org
Cc: Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>,
Chaitanya Kulkarni <Chaitanya.Kulkarni@wdc.com>,
Stephen Bates <sbates@raithlin.com>,
Max Gurtovoy <maxg@mellanox.com>,
Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Subject: [PATCH 2/7] nvmet-tcp: Don't set the request's data_len
Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2019 10:35:40 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191023163545.4193-3-logang@deltatee.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191023163545.4193-1-logang@deltatee.com>
It's not apprporiate for the transports to set the data_len
field of the request which is only used by the core.
In this case, just use a variable on the stack to store the
length of the sgl for comparison.
Signed-off-by: Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com>
---
drivers/nvme/target/tcp.c | 6 ++----
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/nvme/target/tcp.c b/drivers/nvme/target/tcp.c
index 1e2d92f818ad..3378480c49f6 100644
--- a/drivers/nvme/target/tcp.c
+++ b/drivers/nvme/target/tcp.c
@@ -813,13 +813,11 @@ static int nvmet_tcp_handle_icreq(struct nvmet_tcp_queue *queue)
static void nvmet_tcp_handle_req_failure(struct nvmet_tcp_queue *queue,
struct nvmet_tcp_cmd *cmd, struct nvmet_req *req)
{
+ size_t data_len = le32_to_cpu(req->cmd->common.dptr.sgl.length);
int ret;
- /* recover the expected data transfer length */
- req->data_len = le32_to_cpu(req->cmd->common.dptr.sgl.length);
-
if (!nvme_is_write(cmd->req.cmd) ||
- req->data_len > cmd->req.port->inline_data_size) {
+ data_len > cmd->req.port->inline_data_size) {
nvmet_prepare_receive_pdu(queue);
return;
}
--
2.20.1
_______________________________________________
Linux-nvme mailing list
Linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-nvme
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-10-23 16:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-10-23 16:35 [PATCH 0/7] Remove data_len field from the nvmet_req struct Logan Gunthorpe
2019-10-23 16:35 ` [PATCH 1/7] nvmet-tcp: Don't check data_len in nvmet_tcp_map_data() Logan Gunthorpe
2019-10-24 1:15 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-10-23 16:35 ` Logan Gunthorpe [this message]
2019-10-24 1:15 ` [PATCH 2/7] nvmet-tcp: Don't set the request's data_len Christoph Hellwig
2019-10-23 16:35 ` [PATCH 3/7] nvmet: Introduce common execute function for get_log_page and identify Logan Gunthorpe
2019-10-23 20:31 ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
2019-10-24 1:17 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-10-24 17:18 ` Logan Gunthorpe
2019-10-24 22:01 ` Keith Busch
2019-10-24 22:40 ` Logan Gunthorpe
2019-10-23 16:35 ` [PATCH 4/7] nvmet: Cleanup discovery execute handlers Logan Gunthorpe
2019-10-23 16:35 ` [PATCH 5/7] nvmet: Introduce nvmet_dsm_len() helper Logan Gunthorpe
2019-10-23 20:31 ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
2019-10-23 16:35 ` [PATCH 6/7] nvmet: Remove the data_len field from the nvmet_req struct Logan Gunthorpe
2019-10-23 16:35 ` [PATCH 7/7] nvmet: Open code nvmet_req_execute() Logan Gunthorpe
2019-10-23 20:34 ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
2019-10-25 0:20 ` [PATCH 0/7] Remove data_len field from the nvmet_req struct Keith Busch
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20191023163545.4193-3-logang@deltatee.com \
--to=logang@deltatee.com \
--cc=Chaitanya.Kulkarni@wdc.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=maxg@mellanox.com \
--cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
--cc=sbates@raithlin.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).