From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
Cc: Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>, Long Li <longli@microsoft.com>,
linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, Jens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>,
Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] nvme-pci: poll IO after batch submission for multi-mapping queue
Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2019 21:44:46 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191111204446.GA26028@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191108035508.26395-3-ming.lei@redhat.com>
On Fri, Nov 08, 2019 at 11:55:08AM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> f9dde187fa92("nvme-pci: remove cq check after submission") removes
> cq check after submission, this change actually causes performance
> regression on some NVMe drive in which single nvmeq handles requests
> originated from more than one blk-mq sw queues(call it multi-mapping
> queue).
> Follows test result done on Azure L80sv2 guest with NVMe drive(
> Microsoft Corporation Device b111). This guest has 80 CPUs and 10
> numa nodes, and each NVMe drive supports 8 hw queues.
Have you actually seen this on a real nvme drive as well?
Note that it is kinda silly to limit queues like that in VMs, so I
really don't think we should optimize the driver for this particular
case.
_______________________________________________
Linux-nvme mailing list
Linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-nvme
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-11-11 20:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-11-08 3:55 [PATCH 0/2] nvme-pci: improve IO performance via poll after batch submission Ming Lei
2019-11-08 3:55 ` [PATCH 1/2] nvme-pci: move sq/cq_poll lock initialization into nvme_init_queue Ming Lei
2019-11-08 4:12 ` Keith Busch
2019-11-08 7:09 ` Ming Lei
2019-11-08 3:55 ` [PATCH 2/2] nvme-pci: poll IO after batch submission for multi-mapping queue Ming Lei
2019-11-11 20:44 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2019-11-12 0:33 ` Long Li
2019-11-12 1:35 ` Sagi Grimberg
2019-11-12 2:39 ` Ming Lei
2019-11-12 16:25 ` Hannes Reinecke
2019-11-12 16:49 ` Keith Busch
2019-11-12 17:29 ` Hannes Reinecke
2019-11-13 3:05 ` Ming Lei
2019-11-13 3:17 ` Keith Busch
2019-11-13 3:57 ` Ming Lei
2019-11-12 21:20 ` Long Li
2019-11-12 21:36 ` Keith Busch
2019-11-13 0:50 ` Long Li
2019-11-13 2:24 ` Ming Lei
2019-11-12 2:07 ` Ming Lei
2019-11-12 1:44 ` Sagi Grimberg
2019-11-12 9:56 ` Ming Lei
2019-11-12 17:35 ` Sagi Grimberg
2019-11-12 21:17 ` Long Li
2019-11-12 23:44 ` Jens Axboe
2019-11-13 2:47 ` Ming Lei
2019-11-12 18:11 ` Nadolski, Edmund
2019-11-13 13:46 ` Ming Lei
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20191111204446.GA26028@lst.de \
--to=hch@lst.de \
--cc=axboe@fb.com \
--cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=longli@microsoft.com \
--cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
--cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).