From: Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org> To: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de> Cc: linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] nvme: Add support for ACRE Command Interrupted status Date: Thu, 5 Dec 2019 01:07:37 +0900 Message-ID: <20191204160737.GA1791@redsun51.ssa.fujisawa.hgst.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <04835a2e-1769-36c9-63b8-173f247c862b@suse.de> On Wed, Dec 04, 2019 at 02:26:06PM +0100, Hannes Reinecke wrote: > > Why is the controller returning the same error so many times? Are we > > not waiting the requested delay timed? If so, the controller told us > > retrying should be successful. > > > > It is possible we kick the requeue list early if one command error > > has a valid CRD, but a subsequent retryable command does not. Is that > > what's happening? > > > No. The problem is that CRD needs to be observed _in all cases_ whenever > we get a COMMAND INTERRUPTED status. > Currently we're only observing CRD when multipathing is _not_ active, > which is wrong. > > And this is what the patch is trying to achieve. Right, I totally got that part. I just don't understand this follow-up from John that I cropped it out of my original reply: > The alternative is to stop incrementing nvme_req(req)->retries in nvme_retry_req() when CRD is set. > > @@ -258,8 +258,8 @@ static void nvme_retry_req(struct request *req) > crd = (nvme_req(req)->status & NVME_SC_CRD) >> 11; > if (ns && crd) > delay = ns->ctrl->crdt[crd - 1] * 100; >- >- nvme_req(req)->retries++; >+ else >+ nvme_req(req)->retries++; _______________________________________________ linux-nvme mailing list linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-nvme
next prev parent reply index Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2019-11-27 19:12 Meneghini, John 2019-12-03 17:38 ` Meneghini, John 2019-12-03 21:00 ` Keith Busch 2019-12-04 13:26 ` Hannes Reinecke 2019-12-04 14:48 ` Meneghini, John 2019-12-04 16:07 ` Keith Busch [this message] 2019-12-04 18:33 ` Meneghini, John
Reply instructions: You may reply publically to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20191204160737.GA1791@redsun51.ssa.fujisawa.hgst.com \ --to=kbusch@kernel.org \ --cc=hare@suse.de \ --cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Linux-NVME Archive on lore.kernel.org Archives are clonable: git clone --mirror https://lore.kernel.org/linux-nvme/0 linux-nvme/git/0.git # If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may # initialize and index your mirror using the following commands: public-inbox-init -V2 linux-nvme linux-nvme/ https://lore.kernel.org/linux-nvme \ linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org public-inbox-index linux-nvme Example config snippet for mirrors Newsgroup available over NNTP: nntp://nntp.lore.kernel.org/org.infradead.lists.linux-nvme AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/public-inbox.git