From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
To: Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>
Cc: bigeasy@linutronix.de, tglx@linutronix.de,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, sagi@grimberg.me
Subject: Re: [PATCHv3 3/4] nvme/pci: Remove use_threaded_interrupts
Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2019 09:10:38 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191219011038.GA5710@ming.t460p> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191218155050.GA6625@redsun51.ssa.fujisawa.hgst.com>
On Thu, Dec 19, 2019 at 12:50:50AM +0900, Keith Busch wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 18, 2019 at 03:29:46PM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 12, 2019 at 10:14:33AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > > On Tue, Dec 10, 2019 at 02:56:21AM +0900, Keith Busch wrote:
> > > > The nvme threaded interrupt handling provides quick completions for
> > > > latency sensitive workloads, and threaded handlers for more IOPS intensive
> > > > ones. Remove the use_threaded_interrupts nvme module parameter since
> > > > leaving it disabled should not be providing a benefit.
> > >
> > > I think we need some careful benchmarking and numbers to justify the
> > > switch.
> >
> > The patch can fix CPU lockup on Azure's NVMe, however, IOPS drops to
> > ~600K from 3M+.
>
> Compared to current mainline, or is that 3M+ with the poll completions
> from submission?
3M+ can be reached in mainline without poll completions from submission,
which only improves IOPS in single fio job test.
This one is multi-job & multi-drive test:
fio --bs=4k --ioengine=libaio --iodepth=32 --filename=/dev/nvme0n1:/dev/nvme1n1:/dev/nvme2n1:/dev/nvme3n1:/dev/nvme4n1:/dev/nvme5n1:/dev/nvme6n1:/dev/nvme7n1:/dev/nvme8n1:/dev/nvme9n1 --direct=1 --runtime=400 --numjobs=80 --rw=randread --name=test --group_reporting --gtod_reduce=1
Thanks,
Ming
_______________________________________________
linux-nvme mailing list
linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-nvme
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-12-19 1:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-12-09 17:56 [PATCHv3 0/4] nvme pci interrupt handling improvements Keith Busch
2019-12-09 17:56 ` [PATCHv3 1/4] nvme/pci: Disable interrupts for threaded handler Keith Busch
2019-12-10 15:12 ` Daniel Wagner
2019-12-10 15:28 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2019-12-10 15:54 ` Keith Busch
2019-12-10 16:44 ` Daniel Wagner
2019-12-10 16:57 ` Keith Busch
2019-12-10 17:11 ` Daniel Wagner
2019-12-12 9:09 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-12-12 15:53 ` Keith Busch
2019-12-09 17:56 ` [PATCHv3 2/4] nvme/pci: Complete commands from primary handler Keith Busch
2019-12-10 20:00 ` Sagi Grimberg
2019-12-10 20:25 ` Keith Busch
2019-12-10 21:14 ` Sagi Grimberg
2019-12-11 17:35 ` Keith Busch
2019-12-12 0:40 ` Sagi Grimberg
2019-12-12 1:02 ` Keith Busch
2019-12-12 22:55 ` Ming Lei
2019-12-12 23:30 ` Keith Busch
2019-12-13 0:52 ` Ming Lei
2019-12-12 9:14 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-12-09 17:56 ` [PATCHv3 3/4] nvme/pci: Remove use_threaded_interrupts Keith Busch
2019-12-12 9:14 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-12-12 15:45 ` Keith Busch
2019-12-18 7:29 ` Ming Lei
2019-12-18 15:50 ` Keith Busch
2019-12-19 1:10 ` Ming Lei [this message]
2019-12-09 17:56 ` [PATCHv3 4/4] nvme/pci: Poll threaded completions Keith Busch
2019-12-10 17:43 ` Daniel Wagner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20191219011038.GA5710@ming.t460p \
--to=ming.lei@redhat.com \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).