linux-nvme.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>
To: "Ober, Frank" <frank.ober@intel.com>
Cc: "linux-block@vger.kernel.org" <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Rajendiran, Swetha" <swetha.rajendiran@intel.com>,
	"Liang, Mark" <mark.liang@intel.com>,
	"Derrick, Jonathan" <jonathan.derrick@intel.com>,
	"linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org" <linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: Polled io for Linux kernel 5.x
Date: Sat, 21 Dec 2019 06:20:49 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191220212049.GA5582@redsun51.ssa.fujisawa.hgst.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <SN6PR11MB2669F3546ADCCAEF1D8E50308B520@SN6PR11MB2669.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>

On Thu, Dec 19, 2019 at 09:59:14PM +0000, Ober, Frank wrote:
> Thanks Keith, it makes sense to reserve and set it up uniquely if you
> can save hw interrupts. But why would io_uring then not need these
> queues, because a stack trace I ran shows without the special queues I
> am still entering bio_poll. With pvsync2 I can only do polled io with
> the poll_queues?

Polling can happen only if you have polled queues, so io_uring is not
accomplishing anything by calling iopoll. I don't see an immediately
good way to pass that information up to io_uring, though.

_______________________________________________
linux-nvme mailing list
linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-nvme

  reply	other threads:[~2019-12-20 21:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-12-19 19:25 Polled io for Linux kernel 5.x Ober, Frank
2019-12-19 20:52 ` Keith Busch
2019-12-19 21:59   ` Ober, Frank
2019-12-20 21:20     ` Keith Busch [this message]
2019-12-31 19:06       ` Ober, Frank

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20191220212049.GA5582@redsun51.ssa.fujisawa.hgst.com \
    --to=kbusch@kernel.org \
    --cc=frank.ober@intel.com \
    --cc=jonathan.derrick@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=mark.liang@intel.com \
    --cc=swetha.rajendiran@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).