From: weiping zhang <zhangweiping@didichuxing.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, Weiping Zhang <zwp10758@gmail.com>,
Weiping Zhang <zhangweiping@didiglobal.com>,
linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>,
Max Gurtovoy <maxg@mellanox.com>,
sagi@grimberg.me
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nvme: align io queue count with allocted nvme_queue in nvme_probe
Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2020 17:24:27 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200422092416.GA12930@192.168.3.9> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200422083747.GA26915@infradead.org>
On Wed, Apr 22, 2020 at 01:37:47AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 14, 2020 at 03:59:12PM +0300, Max Gurtovoy wrote:
> > > > write_queues and poll queues shouldn't be writable IMO.
> > > >
> > > I think we can keep it writeable, the user case is that setup as many io
> > > queues as possible when load nvme module, then change queue count
> > > for each tag set map dynamically.
> >
> > We can keep it writable but I prefer not change the controller initial queue
> > count after reset controller operation.
> >
> > So we can keep dev->write_queues and dev->poll_queues count for that.
> >
> > You can use the writable param in case you aim to hotplug a new device and
> > you want it to probe with less/more queues.
> >
> > IMO this feature should've somehow configured using nvme-cli as we do with
> > fabrics controllers that we never change this values after initial
> > connection.
> >
> > Keith/Christoph,
> >
> > what is the right approach in your opinion ?
>
> The problem with PCIe is that we only have a per-controller interface
> once the controller is probed. So a global paramter that can be
> changed, but only is sampled once at probe time seems the easiest to
> me. We could also allow a per-controller sysfs file that only takes
> effect after a reset, which seems a little nicer, but adds a lot of
> boilerplate for just being a little nicer, so I'm not entirely sure
> if it is worth the effort.
Hi Christoph,
Because in the real user case, the number of each type queue may
not very suitable, it needs a ability to adjust them without hotplug.
If so, the nvme_dev needs record how many write/poll
queues saved in nvme_probe, and then use them in reset flow.
struct nvme_dev {
...
unsigned int write_queues;
unsigned int poll_queues;
}
How about add sysfs file
/sys/block/nvme0n1/device/io_queues_reload
and then check it in nvme_setup_io_queues, if it's true,
use module paramter, otherwise use parameters saved in nvme_probe.
Thanks
_______________________________________________
linux-nvme mailing list
linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-nvme
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-04-22 9:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-04-10 9:57 [PATCH] nvme: align io queue count with allocted nvme_queue in nvme_probe Weiping Zhang
2020-04-12 12:38 ` Max Gurtovoy
2020-04-13 1:01 ` Weiping Zhang
2020-04-13 9:37 ` Max Gurtovoy
2020-04-13 12:00 ` Weiping Zhang
2020-04-14 12:59 ` Max Gurtovoy
2020-04-22 8:37 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-04-22 9:24 ` weiping zhang [this message]
2020-04-22 16:57 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-04-23 7:59 ` Weiping Zhang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200422092416.GA12930@192.168.3.9 \
--to=zhangweiping@didichuxing.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=maxg@mellanox.com \
--cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
--cc=zhangweiping@didiglobal.com \
--cc=zwp10758@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).