From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Chao Leng <lengchao@huawei.com>,
Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] nvme-multipath: don't block on blk_queue_enter of the underlying device
Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2021 19:22:44 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210323182244.GA16649@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <162dc8f7-b46d-37ff-01e8-51d813e0a904@grimberg.me>
On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 11:13:13AM -0700, Sagi Grimberg wrote:
> The deadlock in this patchset reproduces upstream. It is not possible to
> update the kernel in the env in the original report.
>
> So IFF we assume that this does not reproduce in upstream (pending
> proof), is there something that we can do with stable fixes? This will
> probably go back to everything that is before 5.8...
The direct_make_request removal should be pretty easily backportable.
In old kernels without the streamlined normal path it might cause minor
performance degradations, but the actual change should be trivial.
_______________________________________________
Linux-nvme mailing list
Linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-nvme
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-03-23 18:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-03-22 7:37 fix nvme-tcp and nvme-rdma controller reset hangs when using multipath Christoph Hellwig
2021-03-22 7:37 ` [PATCH 1/2] blk-mq: add a blk_mq_submit_bio_direct API Christoph Hellwig
2021-03-22 11:23 ` Hannes Reinecke
2021-03-22 15:30 ` Keith Busch
2021-03-22 7:37 ` [PATCH 2/2] nvme-multipath: don't block on blk_queue_enter of the underlying device Christoph Hellwig
2021-03-22 11:22 ` Hannes Reinecke
2021-03-22 15:31 ` Keith Busch
2021-03-23 2:57 ` Sagi Grimberg
2021-03-23 3:23 ` Sagi Grimberg
2021-03-23 7:04 ` Chao Leng
2021-03-23 7:36 ` Sagi Grimberg
2021-03-23 8:13 ` Chao Leng
2021-03-23 16:17 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-03-23 16:15 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-03-23 18:13 ` Sagi Grimberg
2021-03-23 18:22 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2021-03-23 19:00 ` Sagi Grimberg
2021-03-23 19:01 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-03-23 19:10 ` Sagi Grimberg
2021-03-23 7:28 ` Hannes Reinecke
2021-03-23 7:31 ` Sagi Grimberg
2021-03-23 8:36 ` Hannes Reinecke
2021-03-23 14:53 ` Keith Busch
2021-03-23 16:19 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210323182244.GA16649@lst.de \
--to=hch@lst.de \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
--cc=lengchao@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).