From: rjw@rjwysocki.net (Rafael J. Wysocki)
Subject: [Regression] Commit "nvme/pci: Use host managed power state for suspend" has problems
Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2019 21:48:57 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2428826.VBuqOhikiK@kreacher> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190725145209.GA6949@localhost.localdomain>
On Thursday, July 25, 2019 4:52:10 PM CEST Keith Busch wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 25, 2019@02:51:41AM -0700, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > Hi Keith,
> >
> > Unfortunately,
> >
> > commit d916b1be94b6dc8d293abed2451f3062f6af7551
> > Author: Keith Busch <keith.busch at intel.com>
> > Date: Thu May 23 09:27:35 2019 -0600
> >
> > nvme-pci: use host managed power state for suspend
> >
> > doesn't universally improve things. In fact, in some cases it makes things worse.
> >
> > For example, on the Dell XPS13 9380 I have here it prevents the processor package
> > from reaching idle states deeper than PC2 in suspend-to-idle (which, of course, also
> > prevents the SoC from reaching any kind of S0ix).
> >
> > That can be readily explained too. Namely, with the commit above the NVMe device
> > stays in D0 over suspend/resume, so the root port it is connected to also has to stay in
> > D0 and that "blocks" package C-states deeper than PC2.
> >
> > In order for the root port to be able to go to D3, the device connected to it also needs
> > to go into D3, so it looks like (at least on this particular machine, but maybe in
> > general), both D3 and the NVMe-specific PM are needed.
> >
> > I'm not sure what to do here, because evidently there are systems where that commit
> > helps. I was thinking about adding a module option allowing the user to override the
> > default behavior which in turn should be compatible with 5.2 and earlier kernels.
>
> Darn, that's too bad. I don't think we can improve one thing at the
> expense of another, so unless we find an acceptable criteria to select
> what low power mode to use, I would be inclined to support a revert or
> a kernel option to default to the previous behavior.
>
> One thing we might check before using NVMe power states is if the lowest
> PS is non-operational with MP below some threshold. What does your device
> report for:
>
> nvme id-ctrl /dev/nvme0
NVME Identify Controller:
vid : 0x1c5c
ssvid : 0x1c5c
sn : MS92N171312902J0N
mn : PC401 NVMe SK hynix 256GB
fr : 80007E00
rab : 2
ieee : ace42e
cmic : 0
mdts : 5
cntlid : 1
ver : 10200
rtd3r : 7a120
rtd3e : 1e8480
oaes : 0x200
ctratt : 0
oacs : 0x17
acl : 7
aerl : 3
frmw : 0x14
lpa : 0x2
elpe : 255
npss : 4
avscc : 0x1
apsta : 0x1
wctemp : 352
cctemp : 354
mtfa : 0
hmpre : 0
hmmin : 0
tnvmcap : 0
unvmcap : 0
rpmbs : 0
edstt : 10
dsto : 0
fwug : 0
kas : 0
hctma : 0
mntmt : 0
mxtmt : 0
sanicap : 0
hmminds : 0
hmmaxd : 0
nsetidmax : 0
anatt : 0
anacap : 0
anagrpmax : 0
nanagrpid : 0
sqes : 0x66
cqes : 0x44
maxcmd : 0
nn : 1
oncs : 0x1f
fuses : 0x1
fna : 0
vwc : 0x1
awun : 7
awupf : 7
nvscc : 1
acwu : 7
sgls : 0
mnan : 0
subnqn :
ioccsz : 0
iorcsz : 0
icdoff : 0
ctrattr : 0
msdbd : 0
ps 0 : mp:6.00W operational enlat:5 exlat:5 rrt:0 rrl:0
rwt:0 rwl:0 idle_power:- active_power:-
ps 1 : mp:3.80W operational enlat:30 exlat:30 rrt:1 rrl:1
rwt:1 rwl:1 idle_power:- active_power:-
ps 2 : mp:2.40W operational enlat:100 exlat:100 rrt:2 rrl:2
rwt:2 rwl:2 idle_power:- active_power:-
ps 3 : mp:0.0700W non-operational enlat:1000 exlat:1000 rrt:3 rrl:3
rwt:3 rwl:3 idle_power:- active_power:-
ps 4 : mp:0.0070W non-operational enlat:1000 exlat:5000 rrt:3 rrl:3
rwt:3 rwl:3 idle_power:- active_power:-
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-07-25 19:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 75+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-07-25 9:51 [Regression] Commit "nvme/pci: Use host managed power state for suspend" has problems Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-07-25 14:02 ` Kai-Heng Feng
2019-07-25 16:23 ` Mario.Limonciello
2019-07-25 17:03 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-07-25 17:23 ` Mario.Limonciello
2019-07-25 18:20 ` Kai-Heng Feng
2019-07-25 19:09 ` Mario.Limonciello
2019-07-30 10:45 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-07-30 14:41 ` Keith Busch
2019-07-30 17:14 ` Mario.Limonciello
2019-07-30 18:50 ` Kai-Heng Feng
2019-07-30 19:19 ` Keith Busch
2019-07-30 21:05 ` Mario.Limonciello
2019-07-30 21:31 ` Keith Busch
2019-07-31 21:25 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-07-31 22:19 ` Keith Busch
2019-07-31 22:33 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-08-01 9:05 ` Kai-Heng Feng
2019-08-01 17:29 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-08-01 19:05 ` Mario.Limonciello
2019-08-01 22:26 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-08-02 10:55 ` Kai-Heng Feng
2019-08-02 11:04 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-08-05 19:13 ` Kai-Heng Feng
2019-08-05 21:28 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-08-06 14:02 ` Mario.Limonciello
2019-08-06 15:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-08-07 10:29 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-08-01 20:22 ` Keith Busch
2019-08-07 9:48 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-08-07 10:45 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-08-07 10:54 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-08-07 9:53 ` [PATCH] nvme-pci: Do not prevent PCI bus-level PM from being used Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-08-07 10:14 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-08-07 10:43 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-08-07 14:37 ` Keith Busch
2019-08-08 8:36 ` [PATCH] nvme-pci: Allow PCI bus-level PM to be used if ASPM is disabled Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-08-08 8:48 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-08-08 9:06 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-08-08 10:03 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] " Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-08-08 10:06 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] PCI: PCIe: ASPM: Introduce pcie_aspm_enabled_mask() Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-08-08 13:15 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2019-08-08 14:48 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-08-08 10:10 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] nvme-pci: Allow PCI bus-level PM to be used if ASPM is disabled Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-08-08 13:43 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2019-08-08 14:47 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-08-08 17:06 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-08-08 18:39 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2019-08-08 20:01 ` Keith Busch
2019-08-08 20:05 ` Mario.Limonciello
2019-08-08 20:41 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-08-09 4:47 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2019-08-09 8:04 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-08-08 21:51 ` [PATCH v3 0/2] " Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-08-08 21:55 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] PCI: PCIe: ASPM: Introduce pcie_aspm_enabled() Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-08-09 4:50 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2019-08-09 8:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-10-07 22:34 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2019-10-08 9:27 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-10-08 21:16 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2019-10-08 22:54 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-10-09 12:49 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2019-08-08 21:58 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] nvme-pci: Allow PCI bus-level PM to be used if ASPM is disabled Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-08-08 22:13 ` [PATCH v3 0/2] " Keith Busch
2019-08-09 8:05 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-08-09 14:52 ` Keith Busch
2019-07-25 16:59 ` [Regression] Commit "nvme/pci: Use host managed power state for suspend" has problems Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-07-25 14:52 ` Keith Busch
2019-07-25 19:48 ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2019-07-25 19:52 ` Keith Busch
2019-07-25 20:02 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-07-26 14:02 ` Kai-Heng Feng
2019-07-27 12:55 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-07-29 15:51 ` Mario.Limonciello
2019-07-29 22:05 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2428826.VBuqOhikiK@kreacher \
--to=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).