linux-nvme.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>,
	"Anner, Ran" <Ran.Anner@dell.com>,
	"linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org" <linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org>,
	"Engel, Amit" <Amit.Engel@dell.com>
Subject: Re: nvme reservation commands during controller reset
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2020 12:29:49 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <29359e09-f386-8004-7369-c8fc055e2c38@grimberg.me> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200817081227.GA12680@infradead.org>


>>>>> Amit,
>>>>>
>>>>> can you try the branch below?  Pretty much hot off the press, but I
>>>>> think this should address your problem:
>>>>>
>>>>> http://git.infradead.org/users/hch/misc.git/shortlog/refs/heads/nvme-pr-fix
>>>>
>>>> I like the approach, but I think we'll need a bit more path awareness
>>>> like we check for available paths if we requeue or fail..
>>>
>>> If there is no available path, nvme_find_path will fail and thus we'll
>>> error it.  This is the same mechanism as used by
>>> nvme_ns_head_submit_bio.
>>
>> nvme_find_path will return ns=NULL even if none of the paths is LIVE,
>> but we want to requeue if we have an available path (e.g. ANA state is
>> inaccessible temporarily or ctrl state is RESETTING/CONNECTING).
> 
> nvme_find_path will return a namespace if there is a namespace with
> an optimized or non-optimized state, and which does not have the
> NVME_NS_ANA_PENDING or NVME_NS_REMOVING flags set on a controller that is
> in the live or deleting states.
> 
> And that is exactly what nvme_ns_head_submit_bio relies on.

Agree.

>> Only if no path is available for request execution we are failing the
>> request.
>>
>> If we are providing multipathing for reservations, we should give
>> the same efforts as we do for normal I/O. This could mean waiting
>> for some indication on the ns path states (wait for a completion in
>> nvme_submit_sync_cmd_disk and wake it up in nvme_mpath_set_live).
> 
> The only difference in nvme_ns_head_submit_bio is that the bio is
> queued up if the controller is in a suitable state.

These are details, let's first discuss the semantics we should be
providing.

   But that isn't
> something we can implement for the passthrough path as we don't have
> an inidividual bio that we can queue up.  Note that not other retries
> are handled by the pr path either, so there is the need for some
> amount of retrying in the caller anyway.

So what is the semantics we want to provide? a best-effort one? not very
different than what we have today. We could, if we choose to, have the
pr context to wait for a path_map_changed completion and have
nvme_mpath_set_live and nvme_mpath_check_last_path do complete_all on
this completion.

But the question is what the semantics we want to provide...

_______________________________________________
Linux-nvme mailing list
Linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-nvme

  reply	other threads:[~2020-08-17 19:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-08-05  7:14 nvme reservation commands during controller reset Engel, Amit
2020-08-09 16:10 ` Keith Busch
2020-08-10 12:40   ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-08-10 15:13     ` Engel, Amit
2020-08-10 15:48       ` Keith Busch
2020-08-11 20:48         ` Sagi Grimberg
2020-08-12  7:00           ` Engel, Amit
2020-08-14  8:20           ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-08-14 10:09             ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-08-14 16:02               ` Keith Busch
2020-08-15  7:00                 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-08-14 18:29               ` Sagi Grimberg
2020-08-15  7:01                 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-08-17  7:56                   ` Sagi Grimberg
2020-08-17  8:12                     ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-08-17 19:29                       ` Sagi Grimberg [this message]
2020-08-18  6:36                         ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-08-18 17:18                           ` Sagi Grimberg

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=29359e09-f386-8004-7369-c8fc055e2c38@grimberg.me \
    --to=sagi@grimberg.me \
    --cc=Amit.Engel@dell.com \
    --cc=Ran.Anner@dell.com \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).