linux-nvme.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>
To: paulmck@kernel.org
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>,
	linux-block@vger.kernel.org, Chao Leng <lengchao@huawei.com>,
	Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>, Ming Lin <mlin@kernel.org>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/2] blk-mq: add tagset quiesce interface
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2020 21:37:23 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <57f76f9c-6fb9-b6f1-ba85-1594755e60f3@grimberg.me> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200729041004.GV9247@paulmck-ThinkPad-P72>


>>>> Dynamically allocating each one is possible but not very scalable.
>>>>
>>>> The question is if there is some way, we can do this with on-stack
>>>> or a single on-heap rcu_head or equivalent that can achieve the same
>>>> effect.
>>>
>>> If the hctx structures are guaranteed to stay put, you could count
>>> them and then do a single allocation of an array of rcu_head structures
>>> (or some larger structure containing an rcu_head structure, if needed).
>>> You could then sequence through this array, consuming one rcu_head per
>>> hctx as you processed it.  Once all the callbacks had been invoked,
>>> it would be safe to free the array.
>>>
>>> Sounds too simple, though.  So what am I missing?
>>
>> We don't want higher-order allocations...
> 
> OK, I will bite...  Do multiple lower-order allocations (page size is
> still lower-order, correct?) and link them together.
> 
> Sorry, couldn't resist...

Possible, but I didn't want us to resort to all this complexity and
thought we can find a better, simpler solution.

_______________________________________________
Linux-nvme mailing list
Linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-nvme

  reply	other threads:[~2020-07-29  4:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-07-27 23:10 [PATCH v5 0/2] improve nvme quiesce time for large amount of namespaces Sagi Grimberg
2020-07-27 23:10 ` [PATCH v5 1/2] blk-mq: add tagset quiesce interface Sagi Grimberg
2020-07-27 23:32   ` Keith Busch
2020-07-28  0:12     ` Sagi Grimberg
2020-07-28  1:40   ` Ming Lei
2020-07-28  1:51     ` Jens Axboe
2020-07-28  2:17       ` Ming Lei
2020-07-28  2:23         ` Jens Axboe
2020-07-28  2:28           ` Ming Lei
2020-07-28  2:32             ` Jens Axboe
2020-07-28  3:29               ` Sagi Grimberg
2020-07-28  3:25     ` Sagi Grimberg
2020-07-28  7:18   ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-07-28  7:48     ` Sagi Grimberg
2020-07-28  9:16     ` Ming Lei
2020-07-28  9:24       ` Sagi Grimberg
2020-07-28  9:33         ` Ming Lei
2020-07-28  9:37           ` Sagi Grimberg
2020-07-28  9:43             ` Sagi Grimberg
2020-07-28 10:10               ` Ming Lei
2020-07-28 10:57                 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-07-28 14:13                 ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-07-28 10:58             ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-07-28 16:25               ` Sagi Grimberg
2020-07-28 13:54         ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-07-28 23:46           ` Sagi Grimberg
2020-07-29  0:31             ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-07-29  0:43               ` Sagi Grimberg
2020-07-29  0:59                 ` Keith Busch
2020-07-29  4:39                   ` Sagi Grimberg
2020-08-07  9:04                     ` Chao Leng
2020-08-07  9:24                       ` Ming Lei
2020-08-07  9:35                         ` Chao Leng
2020-07-29  4:10                 ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-07-29  4:37                   ` Sagi Grimberg [this message]
2020-07-27 23:10 ` [PATCH v5 2/2] nvme: use blk_mq_[un]quiesce_tagset Sagi Grimberg
2020-07-28  0:54   ` Sagi Grimberg
2020-07-28  3:21     ` Chao Leng
2020-07-28  3:34       ` Sagi Grimberg
2020-07-28  3:51         ` Chao Leng

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=57f76f9c-6fb9-b6f1-ba85-1594755e60f3@grimberg.me \
    --to=sagi@grimberg.me \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
    --cc=lengchao@huawei.com \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
    --cc=mlin@kernel.org \
    --cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).