linux-nvme.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Max Gurtovoy <maxg@mellanox.com>
To: James Smart <jsmart2021@gmail.com>, <linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] nvme: Treat discovery subsystems as unique subsystems
Date: Wed, 4 Sep 2019 17:08:00 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5b4c2f45-971c-45aa-49dd-dc1fb228cb87@mellanox.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190903212037.29705-1-jsmart2021@gmail.com>


On 9/4/2019 12:20 AM, James Smart wrote:
> Current code matches subnqn and collapses all controllers to the
> same subnqn to a single subsystem structure. This is good for
> recognizing multiple controllers for the same subsystem. But with
> the well-known discovery subnqn, the subsystems aren't truly the
> same subsystem. As such, subsystem specific rules, such as no
> overlap of controller id, do not apply. With today's behavior, the
> check for overlap of controller id can fail, preventing the new
> discovery controller from being created.
>
> When searching for like subsystem nqn, exclude the discovery nqn
> from matching. This will result in each discovery controller being
> attached to a unique subsystem structure.
>
> Signed-off-by: James Smart <jsmart2021@gmail.com>
> Reviewed-by: Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>
> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
>
> ---
> v2: add comment
> ---
>   drivers/nvme/host/core.c | 11 +++++++++++
>   1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/nvme/host/core.c b/drivers/nvme/host/core.c
> index 4660505eded9..6960781a514e 100644
> --- a/drivers/nvme/host/core.c
> +++ b/drivers/nvme/host/core.c
> @@ -2358,6 +2358,17 @@ static struct nvme_subsystem *__nvme_find_get_subsystem(const char *subsysnqn)
>   
>   	lockdep_assert_held(&nvme_subsystems_lock);
>   
> +	/*
> +	 * Fail matches for discovery subsystems. This results
> +	 * in each discovery controller bound to a unique subsystem.
> +	 * This avoids issues with validating controller values
> +	 * that can only be true when there is a single unique subsystem.
> +	 * There may be multiple and completely independent entities
> +	 * that provide discovery controllers.
> +	 */
> +	if (!strcmp(subsysnqn, NVME_DISC_SUBSYS_NAME))
> +		return NULL;
> +
>   	list_for_each_entry(subsys, &nvme_subsystems, entry) {
>   		if (strcmp(subsys->subnqn, subsysnqn))
>   			continue;


Looks good,

Reviewed-by: Max Gurtovoy <maxg@mellanox.com>



_______________________________________________
Linux-nvme mailing list
Linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-nvme

      parent reply	other threads:[~2019-09-04 14:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-09-03 21:20 [PATCH v2] nvme: Treat discovery subsystems as unique subsystems James Smart
2019-09-04 12:46 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-09-04 14:08 ` Max Gurtovoy [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5b4c2f45-971c-45aa-49dd-dc1fb228cb87@mellanox.com \
    --to=maxg@mellanox.com \
    --cc=jsmart2021@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).