linux-nvme.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>
To: Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>, Chao Leng <lengchao@huawei.com>
Cc: axboe@fb.com, hch@lst.de, linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nvme-core: reduce io pause time when fail over
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2020 09:13:29 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <973d6470-05e8-8be4-2c8b-3162f37a971e@grimberg.me> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200722160054.GA1363519@dhcp-10-100-145-180.wdl.wdc.com>


>> To reduce io pause time, nvme_stop_queues use
>> blk_mq_quiesce_queue_nowait to quiesce the queue, nvme_stop_queues wait
>> all ongoing dispatches completed after all queues has been quiesced.
> 
> The comment above blk_mq_quiesce_queue_nowait() wants to remove this
> function. I'm not sure we should be introducing more users if that's the
> case.
> 
> Using synchronize_rcu() at the end may be looking to much into blk-mq's
> internal quiesce implementation. It happens to be the right thing to do
> for non-blocking hctx, so this patch assumes that will be true for any
> nvme request_queue.

nvme-tcp became a block hctx since we optimize to do network sends from
inside queue_rq. So this should either split into two functions or
nvme-core needs to look into BLK_MQ_F_BLOCKING and do the right thing.

_______________________________________________
Linux-nvme mailing list
Linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-nvme

  reply	other threads:[~2020-07-22 16:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-07-22  9:36 [PATCH] nvme-core: reduce io pause time when fail over Chao Leng
2020-07-22 16:00 ` Keith Busch
2020-07-22 16:13   ` Sagi Grimberg [this message]
2020-07-23  8:06     ` Chao Leng
2020-07-23 16:30       ` Sagi Grimberg
2020-07-23 16:42         ` Keith Busch
2020-07-23 19:12           ` Sagi Grimberg

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=973d6470-05e8-8be4-2c8b-3162f37a971e@grimberg.me \
    --to=sagi@grimberg.me \
    --cc=axboe@fb.com \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
    --cc=lengchao@huawei.com \
    --cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).