From: Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com>
To: Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org
Cc: Chaitanya Kulkarni <Chaitanya.Kulkarni@wdc.com>,
Stephen Bates <sbates@raithlin.com>, Jens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>,
Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>, Max Gurtovoy <maxg@mellanox.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 8/9] nvmet-passthru: Add enable/disable helpers
Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2020 10:37:21 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9c6355d8-cf4e-9932-1cef-0a7140f0fa7e@deltatee.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <96234649-fbc1-fb56-54d8-2f73dc455ffd@grimberg.me>
On 2020-02-26 4:33 p.m., Sagi Grimberg wrote:
>
>> + if (subsys->ver < NVME_VS(1, 2, 1)) {
>> + pr_warn("nvme controller version is too old: %d.%d.%d,
>> advertising 1.2.1\n",
>> + (int)NVME_MAJOR(subsys->ver),
>> + (int)NVME_MINOR(subsys->ver),
>> + (int)NVME_TERTIARY(subsys->ver));
>> + subsys->ver = NVME_VS(1, 2, 1);
>
> Umm.. is this OK? do we implement the mandatory 1.2.1 features on behalf
> of the passthru device?
This was the approach that Christoph suggested. It seemed sensible to
me. However, it would also *probably* be ok to just reject these
devices. Unless you feel strongly about this, I'll probably leave it the
way it is.
>> + }
>> +
>> + mutex_unlock(&subsys->lock);
>> + return 0;
>> +
>> +out_put_ctrl:
>> + nvme_put_ctrl(ctrl);
>> +out_unlock:
>> + mutex_unlock(&subsys->lock);
>> + return ret;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void __nvmet_passthru_ctrl_disable(struct nvmet_subsys *subsys)
>> +{
>> + if (subsys->passthru_ctrl) {
>> + xa_erase(&passthru_subsystems, subsys->passthru_ctrl->cntlid);
>> + nvme_put_ctrl(subsys->passthru_ctrl);
>> + }
>> + subsys->passthru_ctrl = NULL;
>> + subsys->ver = NVMET_DEFAULT_VS;
>> +}
>
> Isn't it strange that a subsystem changes its version in its lifetime?
It does seem strange. However, it's not at all unprecedented. See
nvmet_subsys_attr_version_store() which gives the user direct control of
the version through configfs.
>> +
>> +void nvmet_passthru_ctrl_disable(struct nvmet_subsys *subsys)
>> +{
>> + mutex_lock(&subsys->lock);
>> + __nvmet_passthru_ctrl_disable(subsys);
>> + mutex_unlock(&subsys->lock);
>> +}
>> +
>> +void nvmet_passthru_subsys_free(struct nvmet_subsys *subsys)
>> +{
>> + mutex_lock(&subsys->lock);
>> + __nvmet_passthru_ctrl_disable(subsys);
>> + kfree(subsys->passthru_ctrl_path);
>> + mutex_unlock(&subsys->lock);
>
> Nit, any reason why the free is in the mutex?
Nope. Will fix.
_______________________________________________
linux-nvme mailing list
linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-nvme
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-02-27 17:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-02-20 20:36 [PATCH v11 0/9] nvmet: add target passthru commands support Logan Gunthorpe
2020-02-20 20:36 ` [PATCH v11 1/9] nvme-core: Clear any SGL flags in passthru commands Logan Gunthorpe
2020-02-26 23:08 ` Sagi Grimberg
2020-02-20 20:36 ` [PATCH v11 2/9] nvme: Create helper function to obtain command effects Logan Gunthorpe
2020-02-26 23:09 ` Sagi Grimberg
2020-02-20 20:36 ` [PATCH v11 3/9] nvme: Move nvme_passthru_[start|end]() calls to common helper Logan Gunthorpe
2020-02-26 23:10 ` Sagi Grimberg
2020-02-20 20:36 ` [PATCH v11 4/9] nvmet-passthru: Introduce NVMet passthru Kconfig option Logan Gunthorpe
2020-02-26 23:12 ` Sagi Grimberg
2020-02-20 20:36 ` [PATCH v11 5/9] nvme-core: Introduce nvme_ctrl_get_by_path() Logan Gunthorpe
2020-02-20 20:36 ` [PATCH v11 6/9] nvme: Export existing nvme core functions Logan Gunthorpe
2020-02-26 23:13 ` Sagi Grimberg
2020-02-20 20:36 ` [PATCH v11 7/9] nvmet-passthru: Add passthru code to process commands Logan Gunthorpe
2020-02-26 23:28 ` Sagi Grimberg
2020-02-27 17:33 ` Logan Gunthorpe
2020-02-20 20:36 ` [PATCH v11 8/9] nvmet-passthru: Add enable/disable helpers Logan Gunthorpe
2020-02-26 23:33 ` Sagi Grimberg
2020-02-27 17:37 ` Logan Gunthorpe [this message]
2020-02-27 23:13 ` Sagi Grimberg
2020-02-20 20:36 ` [PATCH v11 9/9] nvmet-configfs: Introduce passthru configfs interface Logan Gunthorpe
2020-02-26 23:35 ` Sagi Grimberg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=9c6355d8-cf4e-9932-1cef-0a7140f0fa7e@deltatee.com \
--to=logang@deltatee.com \
--cc=Chaitanya.Kulkarni@wdc.com \
--cc=axboe@fb.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=maxg@mellanox.com \
--cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
--cc=sbates@raithlin.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).