From: Damien Le Moal <Damien.LeMoal@wdc.com>
To: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
"linux-block@vger.kernel.org" <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org" <linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>, Daniel Wagner <dwagner@suse.de>,
Wen Xiong <wenxiong@us.ibm.com>,
John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] blk-mq: not deactivate hctx if the device doesn't use managed irq
Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2021 23:30:35 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <DM6PR04MB70814885C27FF97CFC02A456E7029@DM6PR04MB7081.namprd04.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20210629074951.1981284-2-ming.lei@redhat.com
On 2021/06/29 16:50, Ming Lei wrote:
> hctx is deactivated when all CPU in hctx->cpumask become offline by
> draining all requests originated from this hctx and moving new
> allocation to active hctx. This way is for avoiding inflight IO when
> the managed irq is shutdown.
>
> Some drivers(nvme fc, rdma, tcp, loop) doesn't use managed irq, so
> they needn't to deactivate hctx. Also, they are the only user of
> blk_mq_alloc_request_hctx() which is used for connecting io queue.
> And their requirement is that the connect request can be submitted
> via one specified hctx on which all CPU in its hctx->cpumask may have
> become offline.
>
> Address the requirement for nvme fc/rdma/loop, so the reported kernel
> panic on the following line in blk_mq_alloc_request_hctx() can be fixed.
>
> data.ctx = __blk_mq_get_ctx(q, cpu)
>
> Cc: Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>
> Cc: Daniel Wagner <dwagner@suse.de>
> Cc: Wen Xiong <wenxiong@us.ibm.com>
> Cc: John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com>
> Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
> ---
> block/blk-mq.c | 6 +++++-
> include/linux/blk-mq.h | 1 +
> 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/block/blk-mq.c b/block/blk-mq.c
> index df5dc3b756f5..74632f50d969 100644
> --- a/block/blk-mq.c
> +++ b/block/blk-mq.c
> @@ -494,7 +494,7 @@ struct request *blk_mq_alloc_request_hctx(struct request_queue *q,
> data.hctx = q->queue_hw_ctx[hctx_idx];
> if (!blk_mq_hw_queue_mapped(data.hctx))
> goto out_queue_exit;
> - cpu = cpumask_first_and(data.hctx->cpumask, cpu_online_mask);
> + cpu = cpumask_first(data.hctx->cpumask);
> data.ctx = __blk_mq_get_ctx(q, cpu);
>
> if (!q->elevator)
> @@ -2570,6 +2570,10 @@ static int blk_mq_hctx_notify_offline(unsigned int cpu, struct hlist_node *node)
> !blk_mq_last_cpu_in_hctx(cpu, hctx))
> return 0;
>
> + /* Controller doesn't use managed IRQ, no need to deactivate hctx */
> + if (hctx->flags & BLK_MQ_F_NOT_USE_MANAGED_IRQ)
> + return 0;
> +
> /*
> * Prevent new request from being allocated on the current hctx.
> *
> diff --git a/include/linux/blk-mq.h b/include/linux/blk-mq.h
> index 21140132a30d..600c5dd1a069 100644
> --- a/include/linux/blk-mq.h
> +++ b/include/linux/blk-mq.h
> @@ -403,6 +403,7 @@ enum {
> */
> BLK_MQ_F_STACKING = 1 << 2,
> BLK_MQ_F_TAG_HCTX_SHARED = 1 << 3,
> + BLK_MQ_F_NOT_USE_MANAGED_IRQ = 1 << 4,
My 2 cents: BLK_MQ_F_NO_MANAGED_IRQ may be a better/shorter name.
> BLK_MQ_F_BLOCKING = 1 << 5,
> BLK_MQ_F_NO_SCHED = 1 << 6,
> BLK_MQ_F_ALLOC_POLICY_START_BIT = 8,
>
--
Damien Le Moal
Western Digital Research
_______________________________________________
Linux-nvme mailing list
Linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-nvme
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-06-29 23:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-06-29 7:49 [PATCH 0/2] blk-mq: fix blk_mq_alloc_request_hctx Ming Lei
2021-06-29 7:49 ` [PATCH 1/2] blk-mq: not deactivate hctx if the device doesn't use managed irq Ming Lei
2021-06-29 12:39 ` Hannes Reinecke
2021-06-29 14:17 ` Ming Lei
2021-06-29 15:49 ` John Garry
2021-06-30 0:32 ` Ming Lei
2021-06-30 9:25 ` John Garry
2021-07-01 9:52 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-06-29 23:30 ` Damien Le Moal [this message]
2021-06-30 18:58 ` Sagi Grimberg
2021-06-30 21:57 ` Damien Le Moal
2021-07-01 14:20 ` Keith Busch
2021-06-29 7:49 ` [PATCH 2/2] nvme: pass BLK_MQ_F_NOT_USE_MANAGED_IRQ for fc/rdma/tcp/loop Ming Lei
2021-06-30 8:15 ` Hannes Reinecke
2021-06-30 8:47 ` Ming Lei
2021-06-30 8:18 ` [PATCH 0/2] blk-mq: fix blk_mq_alloc_request_hctx Hannes Reinecke
2021-06-30 8:42 ` Ming Lei
2021-06-30 9:43 ` Hannes Reinecke
2021-06-30 9:53 ` Ming Lei
2021-06-30 18:59 ` Sagi Grimberg
2021-06-30 19:46 ` Hannes Reinecke
2021-06-30 23:59 ` Ming Lei
2021-07-01 8:00 ` Hannes Reinecke
2021-07-01 9:13 ` Ming Lei
2021-07-02 9:47 ` Daniel Wagner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=DM6PR04MB70814885C27FF97CFC02A456E7029@DM6PR04MB7081.namprd04.prod.outlook.com \
--to=damien.lemoal@wdc.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=dwagner@suse.de \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=john.garry@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
--cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
--cc=wenxiong@us.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).