linux-nvme.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chaitanya.Kulkarni@wdc.com (Chaitanya Kulkarni)
Subject: [PATCH 02/15] block: add a rq_integrity_vec helper
Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2019 05:10:20 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <SN6PR04MB4527A9C0E360C5991F9E00A6865E0@SN6PR04MB4527.namprd04.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20190321231037.25104-3-hch@lst.de

On 3/21/19 4:11 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> This provides a nice little shortcut to get the integrity data for
> drivers like NVMe that only support a single integrity segment.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch at lst.de>
> ---
>   include/linux/blkdev.h | 15 +++++++++++++++
>   1 file changed, 15 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/blkdev.h b/include/linux/blkdev.h
> index 255e20313cde..f9a072610d28 100644
> --- a/include/linux/blkdev.h
> +++ b/include/linux/blkdev.h
> @@ -1552,6 +1552,16 @@ static inline unsigned int bio_integrity_bytes(struct blk_integrity *bi,
>   	return bio_integrity_intervals(bi, sectors) * bi->tuple_size;
>   }
>   
> +/*
> + * Return the first bvec that contains integrity data.  In general only
> + * drivers that are limited to a single integrity segment should use this
> + * helper.
> + */
> +static inline struct bio_vec *rq_integrity_vec(struct request *rq)
> +{
Wrt comment, should we add a check here to make sure underlaying driver
has limited single integrity segment ?
> +	return rq->bio->bi_integrity->bip_vec;
> +}
> +
>   #else /* CONFIG_BLK_DEV_INTEGRITY */
>   
>   struct bio;
> @@ -1626,6 +1636,11 @@ static inline unsigned int bio_integrity_bytes(struct blk_integrity *bi,
>   	return 0;
>   }
>   
> +static inline struct bio_vec *rq_integrity_vec(struct request *rq)
> +{
> +	return NULL;
> +}
> +
>   #endif /* CONFIG_BLK_DEV_INTEGRITY */
>   
>   struct block_device_operations {
> 

Otherwise looks good.

Reviewed-by: Chaitanya Kulkarni <chaitanya.kulkarni at wdc.com>

  reply	other threads:[~2019-03-25  5:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-03-21 23:10 [RFC] optimize nvme single segment I/O Christoph Hellwig
2019-03-21 23:10 ` [PATCH 01/15] block: add a req_bvec helper Christoph Hellwig
2019-03-25  5:07   ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
2019-03-27 14:16     ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-03-21 23:10 ` [PATCH 02/15] block: add a rq_integrity_vec helper Christoph Hellwig
2019-03-25  5:10   ` Chaitanya Kulkarni [this message]
2019-03-27 14:19     ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-03-21 23:10 ` [PATCH 03/15] block: add a rq_dma_dir helper Christoph Hellwig
2019-03-22 13:06   ` Johannes Thumshirn
2019-03-27 14:20     ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-03-28 10:26       ` Johannes Thumshirn
2019-03-25  5:11   ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
2019-03-21 23:10 ` [PATCH 04/15] block: add dma_map_bvec helper Christoph Hellwig
2019-03-25  5:13   ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
2019-03-21 23:10 ` [PATCH 05/15] nvme-pci: remove the unused iod->length field Christoph Hellwig
2019-03-25  5:14   ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
2019-03-21 23:10 ` [PATCH 06/15] nvme-pci: remove nvme_init_iod Christoph Hellwig
2019-03-25  5:19   ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
2019-03-27 14:21     ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-03-21 23:10 ` [PATCH 07/15] nvme-pci: move the call to nvme_cleanup_cmd out of nvme_unmap_data Christoph Hellwig
2019-03-25  5:21   ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
2019-03-21 23:10 ` [PATCH 08/15] nvme-pci: merge nvme_free_iod into nvme_unmap_data Christoph Hellwig
2019-03-25  5:22   ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
2019-03-21 23:10 ` [PATCH 09/15] nvme-pci: only call nvme_unmap_data for requests transferring data Christoph Hellwig
2019-03-25  5:23   ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
2019-03-21 23:10 ` [PATCH 10/15] nvme-pci: do not build a scatterlist to map metadata Christoph Hellwig
2019-03-25  5:27   ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
     [not found]   ` <20190828092057.GA15524@ming.t460p>
2019-09-12  1:02     ` Ming Lei
2019-09-12  8:20       ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-03-21 23:10 ` [PATCH 11/15] nvme-pci: split metadata handling from nvme_map_data / nvme_unmap_data Christoph Hellwig
2019-03-25  5:29   ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
2019-03-21 23:10 ` [PATCH 12/15] nvme-pci: remove the inline scatterlist optimization Christoph Hellwig
2019-03-25  5:30   ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
2019-03-21 23:10 ` [PATCH 13/15] nvme-pci: optimize mapping of small single segment requests Christoph Hellwig
2019-03-25  5:36   ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
2019-03-21 23:10 ` [PATCH 14/15] nvme-pci: optimize mapping single segment requests using SGLs Christoph Hellwig
2019-03-25  5:39   ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
2019-04-30 14:17   ` Klaus Birkelund
2019-04-30 14:32     ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-03-21 23:10 ` [PATCH 15/15] nvme-pci: tidy up nvme_map_data Christoph Hellwig
2019-03-25  5:40   ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
2019-03-22 15:44 ` [RFC] optimize nvme single segment I/O Jens Axboe
2019-03-27 14:24   ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-03-22 17:37 ` Keith Busch
2019-03-22 18:55 ` Sagi Grimberg

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=SN6PR04MB4527A9C0E360C5991F9E00A6865E0@SN6PR04MB4527.namprd04.prod.outlook.com \
    --to=chaitanya.kulkarni@wdc.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).