On Wed, 2020-04-29 at 05:20 +0000, Williams, Dan J wrote:
> The *patch* is not trying to overrule NVME, and the best I can say is
> that the Intel Linux team was not in the loop when this was being
> decided between the platform BIOS implemenation and  whomever  thought
> they could just publish random ACPI properties that impacted NVME
> operation [1].
> 
> So now David is trying to get these platform unbroken because they are
> already shipping with this b0rkage.

This is what we have WARN_TAINT() for though, right? It can suitably
warn users when such breakage is detected in the platform.