From: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com> To: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org> Cc: Jisheng Zhang <Jisheng.Zhang@synaptics.com>, Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@ti.com>, Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>, Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>, Jingoo Han <jingoohan1@gmail.com>, Gustavo Pimentel <gustavo.pimentel@synopsys.com>, PCI <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>, linux-omap <linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 2/2] PCI: dwc: Fix MSI page leakage in suspend/resume Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2020 18:08:11 +0100 [thread overview] Message-ID: <05324fc9-26bf-26bc-bda2-c6ec01ef7e7f@arm.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <CAMj1kXGZnFLaGAFuyMPC8c8TPKf25d1matV9UT2AD2LqO1Rbpw@mail.gmail.com> On 2020-10-14 17:52, Ard Biesheuvel wrote: > On Mon, 12 Oct 2020 at 13:38, Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com> wrote: >> >> On 2020-10-09 08:55, Jisheng Zhang wrote: >>> Currently, dw_pcie_msi_init() allocates and maps page for msi, then >>> program the PCIE_MSI_ADDR_LO and PCIE_MSI_ADDR_HI. The Root Complex >>> may lose power during suspend-to-RAM, so when we resume, we want to >>> redo the latter but not the former. If designware based driver (for >>> example, pcie-tegra194.c) calls dw_pcie_msi_init() in resume path, the >>> msi page will be leaked. >>> >>> As pointed out by Rob and Ard, there's no need to allocate a page for >>> the MSI address, we could use an address in the driver data. >>> >>> To avoid map the MSI msg again during resume, we move the map MSI msg >>> from dw_pcie_msi_init() to dw_pcie_host_init(). >> >> You should move the unmap there as well. As soon as you know what the >> relevant address would be if you *were* to do DMA to this location, then >> the exercise is complete. Leaving it mapped for the lifetime of the >> device in order to do not-DMA to it seems questionable (and represents >> technically incorrect API usage without at least a sync_for_cpu call >> before any other access to the data). >> >> Another point of note is that using streaming DMA mappings at all is a >> bit fragile (regardless of this change). If the host controller itself >> has a limited DMA mask relative to physical memory (which integrators >> still seem to keep doing...) then you could end up punching your MSI >> hole right in the middle of the SWIOTLB bounce buffer, where it's then >> almost *guaranteed* to interfere with real DMA :( >> > > Wouldn't it be the unmap you are suggesting that would create this > problem? If the bounce buffer is never released, the fake MSI doorbell > address can never conflict with any other DMA mappings. True, it's just that hogging a SWIOTLB slot for effectively the entire lifetime of the system is such an anathema that it didn't even cross my mind... Ugh, so I guess the patch as it stands does actually work out more robust than I gave it credit for, even if the reason is horrid... oh well :) Robin. >> If no DWC users have that problem and the current code is working well >> enough, then I see little reason not to make this partucular change to >> tidy up the implementation, just bear in mind that there's always the >> possibility of having to come back and change it yet again in future to >> make it more robust. I had it in mind that this trick was done with a >> coherent DMA allocation, which would be safe from addressing problems >> but would need to be kept around for the lifetime of the device, but >> maybe that was a different driver :/ >> >> Robin. >> >>> Suggested-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> >>> Signed-off-by: Jisheng Zhang <Jisheng.Zhang@synaptics.com> >>> Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> >>> --- >>> drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-dra7xx.c | 18 +++++++++- >>> .../pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-host.c | 33 ++++++++++--------- >>> drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.h | 2 +- >>> 3 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-) >>> >>> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-dra7xx.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-dra7xx.c >>> index 8f0b6d644e4b..6d012d2b1e90 100644 >>> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-dra7xx.c >>> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-dra7xx.c >>> @@ -466,7 +466,9 @@ static struct irq_chip dra7xx_pci_msi_bottom_irq_chip = { >>> static int dra7xx_pcie_msi_host_init(struct pcie_port *pp) >>> { >>> struct dw_pcie *pci = to_dw_pcie_from_pp(pp); >>> + struct device *dev = pci->dev; >>> u32 ctrl, num_ctrls; >>> + int ret; >>> >>> pp->msi_irq_chip = &dra7xx_pci_msi_bottom_irq_chip; >>> >>> @@ -482,7 +484,21 @@ static int dra7xx_pcie_msi_host_init(struct pcie_port *pp) >>> ~0); >>> } >>> >>> - return dw_pcie_allocate_domains(pp); >>> + ret = dw_pcie_allocate_domains(pp); >>> + if (ret) >>> + return ret; >>> + >>> + pp->msi_data = dma_map_single_attrs(dev, &pp->msi_msg, >>> + sizeof(pp->msi_msg), >>> + DMA_FROM_DEVICE, >>> + DMA_ATTR_SKIP_CPU_SYNC); >>> + ret = dma_mapping_error(dev, pp->msi_data); >>> + if (ret) { >>> + dev_err(dev, "Failed to map MSI data\n"); >>> + pp->msi_data = 0; >>> + dw_pcie_free_msi(pp); >>> + } >>> + return ret; >>> } >>> >>> static const struct dw_pcie_host_ops dra7xx_pcie_host_ops = { >>> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-host.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-host.c >>> index d3e9ea11ce9e..d02c7e74738d 100644 >>> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-host.c >>> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-host.c >>> @@ -266,30 +266,23 @@ void dw_pcie_free_msi(struct pcie_port *pp) >>> irq_domain_remove(pp->msi_domain); >>> irq_domain_remove(pp->irq_domain); >>> >>> - if (pp->msi_page) >>> - __free_page(pp->msi_page); >>> + if (pp->msi_data) { >>> + struct dw_pcie *pci = to_dw_pcie_from_pp(pp); >>> + struct device *dev = pci->dev; >>> + >>> + dma_unmap_single_attrs(dev, pp->msi_data, sizeof(pp->msi_msg), >>> + DMA_FROM_DEVICE, DMA_ATTR_SKIP_CPU_SYNC); >>> + } >>> } >>> >>> void dw_pcie_msi_init(struct pcie_port *pp) >>> { >>> struct dw_pcie *pci = to_dw_pcie_from_pp(pp); >>> - struct device *dev = pci->dev; >>> - u64 msi_target; >>> + u64 msi_target = (u64)pp->msi_data; >>> >>> if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PCI_MSI)) >>> return; >>> >>> - pp->msi_page = alloc_page(GFP_KERNEL); >>> - pp->msi_data = dma_map_page(dev, pp->msi_page, 0, PAGE_SIZE, >>> - DMA_FROM_DEVICE); >>> - if (dma_mapping_error(dev, pp->msi_data)) { >>> - dev_err(dev, "Failed to map MSI data\n"); >>> - __free_page(pp->msi_page); >>> - pp->msi_page = NULL; >>> - return; >>> - } >>> - msi_target = (u64)pp->msi_data; >>> - >>> /* Program the msi_data */ >>> dw_pcie_writel_dbi(pci, PCIE_MSI_ADDR_LO, lower_32_bits(msi_target)); >>> dw_pcie_writel_dbi(pci, PCIE_MSI_ADDR_HI, upper_32_bits(msi_target)); >>> @@ -394,6 +387,16 @@ int dw_pcie_host_init(struct pcie_port *pp) >>> irq_set_chained_handler_and_data(pp->msi_irq, >>> dw_chained_msi_isr, >>> pp); >>> + >>> + pp->msi_data = dma_map_single_attrs(pci->dev, &pp->msi_msg, >>> + sizeof(pp->msi_msg), >>> + DMA_FROM_DEVICE, >>> + DMA_ATTR_SKIP_CPU_SYNC); >>> + if (dma_mapping_error(pci->dev, pp->msi_data)) { >>> + dev_err(pci->dev, "Failed to map MSI data\n"); >>> + pp->msi_data = 0; >>> + goto err_free_msi; >>> + } >>> } else { >>> ret = pp->ops->msi_host_init(pp); >>> if (ret < 0) >>> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.h b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.h >>> index 97c7063b9e89..9d2f511f13fa 100644 >>> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.h >>> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.h >>> @@ -190,8 +190,8 @@ struct pcie_port { >>> int msi_irq; >>> struct irq_domain *irq_domain; >>> struct irq_domain *msi_domain; >>> + u16 msi_msg; >>> dma_addr_t msi_data; >>> - struct page *msi_page; >>> struct irq_chip *msi_irq_chip; >>> u32 num_vectors; >>> u32 irq_mask[MAX_MSI_CTRLS]; >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> linux-arm-kernel mailing list >> linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org >> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-10-14 17:08 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2020-10-09 7:53 [PATCH v7 0/2] PCI: dwc: fix two MSI issues Jisheng Zhang 2020-10-09 7:54 ` [PATCH v7 1/2] PCI: dwc: Skip PCIE_MSI_INTR0* programming if MSI is disabled Jisheng Zhang 2020-10-09 7:55 ` [PATCH v7 2/2] PCI: dwc: Fix MSI page leakage in suspend/resume Jisheng Zhang 2020-10-12 11:37 ` Robin Murphy 2020-10-12 15:35 ` Vidya Sagar 2020-10-14 14:15 ` Rob Herring 2020-10-14 14:49 ` Robin Murphy 2020-10-14 16:52 ` Ard Biesheuvel 2020-10-14 17:08 ` Robin Murphy [this message] 2020-10-09 8:49 ` [PATCH v7 0/2] PCI: dwc: fix two MSI issues Lorenzo Pieralisi
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=05324fc9-26bf-26bc-bda2-c6ec01ef7e7f@arm.com \ --to=robin.murphy@arm.com \ --cc=Jisheng.Zhang@synaptics.com \ --cc=ardb@kernel.org \ --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \ --cc=gustavo.pimentel@synopsys.com \ --cc=jingoohan1@gmail.com \ --cc=kishon@ti.com \ --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \ --cc=robh@kernel.org \ --subject='Re: [PATCH v7 2/2] PCI: dwc: Fix MSI page leakage in suspend/resume' \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).