From: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
To: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, arm@kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: SDP4430 nightly regression (was: Re: [GIT PULL] two omap regression fixes)
Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2017 10:26:48 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171103172648.GI28152@atomide.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171103160518.GG28152@atomide.com>
* Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> [171103 16:07]:
> * Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@armlinux.org.uk> [171103 10:45]:
> > In the diffstat between the two build trees (post merge), I don't see
> > anything in arch/arm that could account for it. I do see some power
> > changes:
> >
> > drivers/base/power/domain_governor.c | 53 +--
> > drivers/base/power/qos.c | 2 +-
> > drivers/base/power/runtime.c | 2 +-
> > drivers/base/power/sysfs.c | 25 +-
> >
> > but nothing in tty or serial. These power changes look like QoS
> > changes, which probably aren't related.
> >
> > Just to make sure, I've diffed the build tree SHAs and the change in
> > Linus' tip, and the two diffs match apart from a couple of SHA blob
> > hashes on a couple of files (EFI stub and MAINTAINERS).
>
> Initiating git bisect sequence.
Seems this is now fixed in the mainline kernel. I also confirmed
that v4.14-rc6 fails to resume. Most likely Rafael's revert of
the following two commits fixed the issue:
5ba257249e9c ("Revert "PM / QoS: Fix default runtime_pm device resume latency"")
d5919dcc349d ("Revert "PM / QoS: Fix device resume latency PM QoS"")
Regards,
Tony
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-11-03 17:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-11-02 19:55 [GIT PULL] two omap regression fixes Tony Lindgren
2017-11-03 10:43 ` SDP4430 nightly regression (was: Re: [GIT PULL] two omap regression fixes) Russell King - ARM Linux
2017-11-03 16:05 ` Tony Lindgren
2017-11-03 17:26 ` Tony Lindgren [this message]
2017-11-03 17:44 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20171103172648.GI28152@atomide.com \
--to=tony@atomide.com \
--cc=arm@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).