Linux-OMAP Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / Atom feed
From: Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com>
To: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-imx@nxp.com,
	Dietmar.Eggemann@arm.com, cw00.choi@samsung.com,
	b.zolnierkie@samsung.com, rjw@rjwysocki.net,
	sudeep.holla@arm.com, viresh.kumar@linaro.org, nm@ti.com,
	sboyd@kernel.org, rui.zhang@intel.com,
	amit.kucheria@verdurent.com, daniel.lezcano@linaro.org,
	mingo@redhat.com, peterz@infradead.org, juri.lelli@redhat.com,
	vincent.guittot@linaro.org, rostedt@goodmis.org,
	bsegall@google.com, mgorman@suse.de, shawnguo@kernel.org,
	s.hauer@pengutronix.de, festevam@gmail.com,
	kernel@pengutronix.de, khilman@kernel.org, agross@kernel.org,
	bjorn.andersson@linaro.org, robh@kernel.org,
	matthias.bgg@gmail.com, steven.price@arm.com,
	tomeu.vizoso@collabora.com, alyssa.rosenzweig@collabora.com,
	airlied@linux.ie, daniel@ffwll.ch, liviu.dudau@arm.com,
	lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com, patrick.bellasi@matbug.net,
	orjan.eide@arm.com, rdunlap@infradead.org, mka@chromium.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 04/15] PM / EM: add support for other devices than CPUs in Energy Model
Date: Mon, 11 May 2020 14:43:19 +0100
Message-ID: <20200511134319.GA29112@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200511111912.3001-5-lukasz.luba@arm.com>

Hey Lukasz,

On Monday 11 May 2020 at 12:19:01 (+0100), Lukasz Luba wrote:
<snip>
> @@ -27,12 +29,15 @@ struct em_perf_state {
>   * em_perf_domain - Performance domain
>   * @table:		List of performance states, in ascending order
>   * @nr_perf_states:	Number of performance states
> - * @cpus:		Cpumask covering the CPUs of the domain
> + * @cpus:		Cpumask covering the CPUs of the domain. It's here
> + *			for performance reasons to avoid potential cache
> + *			misses during energy calculations in the scheduler

And because that saves a pointer, and simplifies allocating/freeing that
memory region :)

<snip>
> diff --git a/kernel/power/energy_model.c b/kernel/power/energy_model.c
> index 5b8a1566526a..9cc7f2973600 100644
> --- a/kernel/power/energy_model.c
> +++ b/kernel/power/energy_model.c
> @@ -2,8 +2,9 @@
>  /*
>   * Energy Model of CPUs

Should this comment change too?

<snip>
> -static void em_debug_create_pd(struct em_perf_domain *pd, int cpu)
> +static void em_debug_create_pd(struct device *dev)
>  {
>  	struct dentry *d;
> -	char name[8];
>  	int i;
>  
> -	snprintf(name, sizeof(name), "pd%d", cpu);
> -
>  	/* Create the directory of the performance domain */
> -	d = debugfs_create_dir(name, rootdir);
> +	d = debugfs_create_dir(dev_name(dev), rootdir);

So what will be the name for the perf domain of CPUs now? cpuX?

<snip>
> @@ -142,8 +149,8 @@ em_create_pd(struct device *dev, int nr_states, struct em_data_callback *cb,
>  		 */
>  		opp_eff = freq / power;
>  		if (opp_eff >= prev_opp_eff)
> -			pr_warn("pd%d: hertz/watts ratio non-monotonically decreasing: em_perf_state %d >= em_perf_state%d\n",
> -					cpu, i, i - 1);
> +			dev_dbg(dev, "EM: hertz/watts ratio non-monotonically decreasing: em_perf_state %d >= em_perf_state%d\n",
> +					i, i - 1);

It feels like changing from warn to debug doesn't really belong to this
patch no?

<snip>
> @@ -216,47 +274,50 @@ int em_dev_register_perf_domain(struct device *dev, unsigned int nr_states,
>  	 */
>  	mutex_lock(&em_pd_mutex);
>  
> -	for_each_cpu(cpu, span) {
> -		/* Make sure we don't register again an existing domain. */
> -		if (READ_ONCE(per_cpu(em_data, cpu))) {
> -			ret = -EEXIST;
> -			goto unlock;
> -		}
> +	if (dev->em_pd) {
> +		ret = -EEXIST;
> +		goto unlock;
> +	}
>  
> -		/*
> -		 * All CPUs of a domain must have the same micro-architecture
> -		 * since they all share the same table.
> -		 */
> -		cap = arch_scale_cpu_capacity(cpu);
> -		if (prev_cap && prev_cap != cap) {
> -			pr_err("CPUs of %*pbl must have the same capacity\n",
> -							cpumask_pr_args(span));
> +	if (_is_cpu_device(dev)) {

Something like

	if (!_is_cpu_device(dev))
		goto device;

would limit the diff a bit, but that may just be personal taste.

But appart from these nits, the patch LGTM.

Thanks,
Quentin

  reply index

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-05-11 11:18 [PATCH v7 00/15] Add support for devices in the " Lukasz Luba
2020-05-11 11:18 ` [PATCH v7 01/15] PM / EM: change naming convention from 'capacity' to 'performance' Lukasz Luba
2020-05-11 11:46   ` Quentin Perret
2020-05-11 11:18 ` [PATCH v7 02/15] PM / EM: introduce em_dev_register_perf_domain function Lukasz Luba
2020-05-11 11:51   ` Quentin Perret
2020-05-11 11:19 ` [PATCH v7 03/15] PM / EM: update callback structure and add device pointer Lukasz Luba
2020-05-11 11:57   ` Quentin Perret
2020-05-12 11:11     ` Lukasz Luba
2020-05-11 11:19 ` [PATCH v7 04/15] PM / EM: add support for other devices than CPUs in Energy Model Lukasz Luba
2020-05-11 13:43   ` Quentin Perret [this message]
2020-05-12 11:38     ` Lukasz Luba
2020-05-11 11:19 ` [PATCH v7 05/15] PM / EM: remove em_register_perf_domain Lukasz Luba
2020-05-11 13:44   ` Quentin Perret
2020-05-11 11:19 ` [PATCH v7 06/15] PM / EM: change name of em_pd_energy to em_cpu_energy Lukasz Luba
2020-05-11 13:45   ` Quentin Perret
2020-05-11 11:19 ` [PATCH v7 07/15] Documentation: power: update Energy Model description Lukasz Luba
2020-05-11 13:48   ` Quentin Perret
2020-05-11 11:19 ` [PATCH v7 08/15] OPP: refactor dev_pm_opp_of_register_em() and update related drivers Lukasz Luba
2020-05-11 11:19 ` [PATCH v7 09/15] thermal: devfreq_cooling: change tracing function and arguments Lukasz Luba
2020-05-11 11:19 ` [PATCH v7 10/15] thermal: devfreq_cooling: get device load and frequency directly Lukasz Luba
2020-05-11 11:19 ` [PATCH v7 11/15] thermal: devfreq_cooling: work on a copy of device status Lukasz Luba
2020-05-11 11:19 ` [PATCH v7 12/15] thermal: devfreq_cooling: add new registration functions with Energy Model Lukasz Luba
2020-05-11 11:19 ` [PATCH v7 13/15] thermal: devfreq_cooling: remove old power model and use EM Lukasz Luba
2020-05-11 11:19 ` [PATCH v7 14/15] thermal: devfreq_cooling: update license to use SPDX Lukasz Luba
2020-05-11 11:19 ` [PATCH v7 15/15] drm/panfrost: Register devfreq cooling and attempt to add Energy Model Lukasz Luba
2020-05-22 10:43 ` [PATCH v7 00/15] Add support for devices in the " Daniel Lezcano
2020-05-22 12:58   ` Lukasz Luba
2020-05-22 13:01     ` Daniel Lezcano

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200511134319.GA29112@google.com \
    --to=qperret@google.com \
    --cc=Dietmar.Eggemann@arm.com \
    --cc=agross@kernel.org \
    --cc=airlied@linux.ie \
    --cc=alyssa.rosenzweig@collabora.com \
    --cc=amit.kucheria@verdurent.com \
    --cc=b.zolnierkie@samsung.com \
    --cc=bjorn.andersson@linaro.org \
    --cc=bsegall@google.com \
    --cc=cw00.choi@samsung.com \
    --cc=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
    --cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=festevam@gmail.com \
    --cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
    --cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=khilman@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-imx@nxp.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=liviu.dudau@arm.com \
    --cc=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
    --cc=lukasz.luba@arm.com \
    --cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=mka@chromium.org \
    --cc=nm@ti.com \
    --cc=orjan.eide@arm.com \
    --cc=patrick.bellasi@matbug.net \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=rui.zhang@intel.com \
    --cc=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
    --cc=shawnguo@kernel.org \
    --cc=steven.price@arm.com \
    --cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
    --cc=tomeu.vizoso@collabora.com \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    --cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

Linux-OMAP Archive on lore.kernel.org

Archives are clonable:
	git clone --mirror https://lore.kernel.org/linux-omap/0 linux-omap/git/0.git

	# If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may
	# initialize and index your mirror using the following commands:
	public-inbox-init -V2 linux-omap linux-omap/ https://lore.kernel.org/linux-omap \
		linux-omap@vger.kernel.org
	public-inbox-index linux-omap

Example config snippet for mirrors

Newsgroup available over NNTP:
	nntp://nntp.lore.kernel.org/org.kernel.vger.linux-omap


AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/public-inbox.git