From: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
To: Drew Fustini <drew@beagleboard.org>
Cc: Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang@linaro.org>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
linux-omap@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: pinctrl-single: num_maps in generic pinconf support?
Date: Wed, 27 May 2020 09:51:22 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200527165122.GL37466@atomide.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200526122133.GA1454440@x1>
* Drew Fustini <drew@beagleboard.org> [200526 12:22]:
> Hello Haojian and Linus,
>
> For pcs_parse_one_pinctrl_entry() in drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-single.c,
> I see that num_maps is set to 2 if PCS_HAS_PINCONF is enabled:
>
> 1057 if (PCS_HAS_PINCONF && function) {
> 1058 res = pcs_parse_pinconf(pcs, np, function, map);
> 1059 if (res)
> 1060 goto free_pingroups;
> 1061 *num_maps = 2;
> 1062 } else {
> 1063 *num_maps = 1;
> 1064 }
> 1065 mutex_unlock(&pcs->mutex);
>
> git blame shows me that came from 9dddb4df90d13:
> "pinctrl: single: support generic pinconf"
>
> Would you be able to provide any insight as to num_maps needs to be 2
> when pinconf is enabled?
Only slightly related, but we should really eventually move omaps to use
#pinctrl-cells = <2> (or 3) instead of 1, and pass the pinconf seprately
from the mux mode. We already treat them separately with the new
AM33XX_PADCONF macro, so we'd only have to change one SoC at a time to
use updated #pinctrl-cells. But I think pinctrl-single might need some
changes before we can do that.
Regards,
Tony
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-05-27 16:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-05-26 12:21 pinctrl-single: num_maps in generic pinconf support? Drew Fustini
2020-05-27 16:51 ` Tony Lindgren [this message]
2020-05-27 22:19 ` Drew Fustini
2020-05-27 22:41 ` Tony Lindgren
2020-05-28 12:53 ` Drew Fustini
2020-05-29 17:40 ` Tony Lindgren
2020-06-08 18:05 ` Drew Fustini
2020-06-08 20:22 ` Drew Fustini
2020-06-09 18:04 ` Tony Lindgren
2020-06-09 17:55 ` Tony Lindgren
2020-05-29 17:55 ` Drew Fustini
2020-05-31 0:17 ` Drew Fustini
2020-06-08 12:09 ` Linus Walleij
2020-06-08 12:40 ` Drew Fustini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200527165122.GL37466@atomide.com \
--to=tony@atomide.com \
--cc=drew@beagleboard.org \
--cc=haojian.zhuang@linaro.org \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).