From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-omap-owner@kernel.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on
	aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,
	HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,
	SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
	version=3.4.0
Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99])
	by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CA64C2D0E4
	for <linux-omap@archiver.kernel.org>; Tue, 24 Nov 2020 16:18:44 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18])
	by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEC13206C0
	for <linux-omap@archiver.kernel.org>; Tue, 24 Nov 2020 16:18:43 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S2390054AbgKXQSn (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-omap@archiver.kernel.org>);
        Tue, 24 Nov 2020 11:18:43 -0500
Received: from asavdk3.altibox.net ([109.247.116.14]:38126 "EHLO
        asavdk3.altibox.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S2390095AbgKXQSn (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>); Tue, 24 Nov 2020 11:18:43 -0500
Received: from ravnborg.org (unknown [188.228.123.71])
        (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
        (No client certificate requested)
        by asavdk3.altibox.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 86C7A2001F;
        Tue, 24 Nov 2020 17:18:38 +0100 (CET)
Date:   Tue, 24 Nov 2020 17:18:36 +0100
From:   Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
To:     Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ti.com>
Cc:     Sebastian Reichel <sre@kernel.org>,
        Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>,
        Nikhil Devshatwar <nikhil.nd@ti.com>,
        linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
        Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>, hns@goldelico.com,
        Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 55/80] drm/panel: panel-dsi-cm: use
 MIPI_DCS_GET_ERROR_COUNT_ON_DSI
Message-ID: <20201124161836.GA50534@ravnborg.org>
References: <20201124124538.660710-1-tomi.valkeinen@ti.com>
 <20201124124538.660710-56-tomi.valkeinen@ti.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20201124124538.660710-56-tomi.valkeinen@ti.com>
X-CMAE-Score: 0
X-CMAE-Analysis: v=2.3 cv=VbvZwmh9 c=1 sm=1 tr=0
        a=S6zTFyMACwkrwXSdXUNehg==:117 a=S6zTFyMACwkrwXSdXUNehg==:17
        a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=sozttTNsAAAA:8 a=7gkXJVJtAAAA:8
        a=Opy16KTp1ka3POWpBgQA:9 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 a=aeg5Gbbo78KNqacMgKqU:22
        a=E9Po1WZjFZOl8hwRPBS3:22
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <linux-omap.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org

Hi Tomi,

On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 02:45:13PM +0200, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
> Use the common MIPI_DCS_GET_ERROR_COUNT_ON_DSI define instead of
> driver's own.
> 
They are both 5 - OK

> Signed-off-by: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ti.com>
Reviewed-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>

IMO you should get all the patches at least up including this patch applied.
They are all reviewed/acked. And then you have a much smaller stack of
patches to spam us with.

	Sam