From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Vignesh R Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] mfd: ti_am335x_tscadc: Provide unique name for child mfd cells Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2018 17:13:42 +0530 Message-ID: <30d8df49-f39d-8259-773c-23ebad273e96@ti.com> References: <20181119064236.28902-1-vigneshr@ti.com> <20181119064236.28902-2-vigneshr@ti.com> <20181128090726.GS4272@dell> <16f2b753-1fde-3d20-6ddf-5dc5e4f13a15@ti.com> <20181128110321.GG4272@dell> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20181128110321.GG4272@dell> Content-Language: en-US Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Lee Jones Cc: Jonathan Cameron , Hartmut Knaack , Lars-Peter Clausen , Peter Meerwald-Stadler , linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org On 28/11/18 4:33 PM, Lee Jones wrote: > On Wed, 28 Nov 2018, Vignesh R wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> On 28/11/18 2:37 PM, Lee Jones wrote: >>> On Mon, 19 Nov 2018, Vignesh R wrote: >>> >>>> Provide unique names for child mfd cells, this is required in order to >>>> support registering of multiple instances of same ti_am335x_tscadc IP. >>> >>> I don't think it is. What is the error you are receiving? >> >> W/o this patch I get: >> >> [ 2.296839] sysfs: cannot create duplicate filename '/bus/platform/devices/TI-am335x-adc' >> [ 2.305085] CPU: 0 PID: 31 Comm: kworker/0:1 Not tainted 4.20.0-rc3-next-20181123-00018-g >> 7791ce8f123f-dirty #182 >> [ 2.315254] Hardware name: Texas Instruments AM654 Base Board (DT) >> [ 2.321447] Workqueue: events deferred_probe_work_func >> [ 2.326585] Call trace: >> [ 2.329036] dump_backtrace+0x0/0x1c0 >> [ 2.332699] show_stack+0x14/0x20 >> [ 2.336017] dump_stack+0x9c/0xbc >> [ 2.339333] sysfs_warn_dup+0x60/0x78 >> [ 2.342995] sysfs_do_create_link_sd.isra.0+0xdc/0xe8 >> [ 2.348042] sysfs_create_link+0x20/0x40 >> [ 2.351963] bus_add_device+0x68/0x130 >> [ 2.355711] device_add+0x398/0x618 >> [ 2.359199] platform_device_add+0x120/0x290 >> [ 2.363469] mfd_add_device+0x23c/0x2e8 >> [ 2.367302] mfd_add_devices+0xb4/0x158 >> [ 2.371136] ti_tscadc_probe+0x35c/0x4c8 >> [ 2.375056] platform_drv_probe+0x50/0xa0 >> [ 2.379062] really_probe+0x204/0x2a8 >> [ 2.382722] driver_probe_device+0x58/0x100 >> [ 2.386903] __device_attach_driver+0x98/0xf0 >> [ 2.391258] bus_for_each_drv+0x64/0xc8 >> [ 2.395091] __device_attach+0xd8/0x138 >> [ 2.398923] device_initial_probe+0x10/0x18 >> [ 2.403103] bus_probe_device+0x90/0x98 >> [ 2.406938] deferred_probe_work_func+0x74/0xb0 >> [ 2.411470] process_one_work+0x1e0/0x330 >> [ 2.415478] worker_thread+0x238/0x460 >> [ 2.419225] kthread+0x128/0x130 >> [ 2.422452] ret_from_fork+0x10/0x1c >> [ 2.426195] ti_am3359-tscadc: probe of 40210000.tscadc failed with error -1 > > That's because of the way the cells are being registered: > > err = mfd_add_devices(&pdev->dev, pdev->id, tscadc->cells, > tscadc->used_cells, NULL, 0, NULL); > > The cells are not numbered (tscadc->cells->id is always 0) and you are > forcing the use of the platform ID from the parent platform device > (with pdev->id here). Instead you should s/pdev->id/PLATFORM_DEVID_AUTO/ > or number the cells manually. I suggest the former. > Using PLATFORM_DEVID_AUTO works fine. I will post v2 with this change. Thanks for the suggestion! Regards Vignesh >>>> Signed-off-by: Vignesh R >>>> --- >>>> drivers/mfd/ti_am335x_tscadc.c | 6 ++++-- >>>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >>>> >>>> diff --git a/drivers/mfd/ti_am335x_tscadc.c b/drivers/mfd/ti_am335x_tscadc.c >>>> index c2d47d78705b..ee08af34f81d 100644 >>>> --- a/drivers/mfd/ti_am335x_tscadc.c >>>> +++ b/drivers/mfd/ti_am335x_tscadc.c >>>> @@ -248,7 +248,8 @@ static int ti_tscadc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) >>>> if (tsc_wires > 0) { >>>> tscadc->tsc_cell = tscadc->used_cells; >>>> cell = &tscadc->cells[tscadc->used_cells++]; >>>> - cell->name = "TI-am335x-tsc"; >>>> + cell->name = devm_kasprintf(&pdev->dev, GFP_KERNEL, "%s:%s", >>>> + dev_name(&pdev->dev), "tsc"); >>>> cell->of_compatible = "ti,am3359-tsc"; >>>> cell->platform_data = &tscadc; >>>> cell->pdata_size = sizeof(tscadc); >>>> @@ -258,7 +259,8 @@ static int ti_tscadc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) >>>> if (adc_channels > 0) { >>>> tscadc->adc_cell = tscadc->used_cells; >>>> cell = &tscadc->cells[tscadc->used_cells++]; >>>> - cell->name = "TI-am335x-adc"; >>>> + cell->name = devm_kasprintf(&pdev->dev, GFP_KERNEL, "%s:%s", >>>> + dev_name(&pdev->dev), "adc"); >>>> cell->of_compatible = "ti,am3359-adc"; >>>> cell->platform_data = &tscadc; >>>> cell->pdata_size = sizeof(tscadc); >>> >> > -- Regards Vignesh