linux-omap.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Roger Quadros <rogerq@ti.com>
To: YueHaibing <yuehaibing@huawei.com>, <tony@atomide.com>,
	<krzk@kernel.org>
Cc: <linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 -next] memory: omap-gpmc: Fix -Wunused-function warnings
Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2020 15:11:37 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <616e2369-13d1-b120-d1c2-bf8fea7f52b7@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200901112832.3084-1-yuehaibing@huawei.com>



On 01/09/2020 14:28, YueHaibing wrote:
> If CONFIG_OF is not set, make W=1 warns:
> 
> drivers/memory/omap-gpmc.c:987:12: warning: ‘gpmc_cs_remap’ defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
>   static int gpmc_cs_remap(int cs, u32 base)
>              ^~~~~~~~~~~~~
> drivers/memory/omap-gpmc.c:926:20: warning: ‘gpmc_cs_get_name’ defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
>   static const char *gpmc_cs_get_name(int cs)
>                      ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> drivers/memory/omap-gpmc.c:919:13: warning: ‘gpmc_cs_set_name’ defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
>   static void gpmc_cs_set_name(int cs, const char *name)
>               ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> Move them to #ifdef CONFIG_OF block to fix this.
> 
> Signed-off-by: YueHaibing <yuehaibing@huawei.com>

Acked-by: Roger Quadros <rogerq@ti.com>

> ---
> v3: move the functions to #ifdef block
> v2: update commit log
> ---
>   drivers/memory/omap-gpmc.c | 114 ++++++++++++++++++-------------------
>   1 file changed, 57 insertions(+), 57 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/memory/omap-gpmc.c b/drivers/memory/omap-gpmc.c
> index ac0f577a51a1..cfa730cfd145 100644
> --- a/drivers/memory/omap-gpmc.c
> +++ b/drivers/memory/omap-gpmc.c
> @@ -916,20 +916,6 @@ static bool gpmc_cs_reserved(int cs)
>   	return gpmc->flags & GPMC_CS_RESERVED;
>   }
>   
> -static void gpmc_cs_set_name(int cs, const char *name)
> -{
> -	struct gpmc_cs_data *gpmc = &gpmc_cs[cs];
> -
> -	gpmc->name = name;
> -}
> -
> -static const char *gpmc_cs_get_name(int cs)
> -{
> -	struct gpmc_cs_data *gpmc = &gpmc_cs[cs];
> -
> -	return gpmc->name;
> -}
> -
>   static unsigned long gpmc_mem_align(unsigned long size)
>   {
>   	int order;
> @@ -975,49 +961,6 @@ static int gpmc_cs_delete_mem(int cs)
>   	return r;
>   }
>   
> -/**
> - * gpmc_cs_remap - remaps a chip-select physical base address
> - * @cs:		chip-select to remap
> - * @base:	physical base address to re-map chip-select to
> - *
> - * Re-maps a chip-select to a new physical base address specified by
> - * "base". Returns 0 on success and appropriate negative error code
> - * on failure.
> - */
> -static int gpmc_cs_remap(int cs, u32 base)
> -{
> -	int ret;
> -	u32 old_base, size;
> -
> -	if (cs >= gpmc_cs_num) {
> -		pr_err("%s: requested chip-select is disabled\n", __func__);
> -		return -ENODEV;
> -	}
> -
> -	/*
> -	 * Make sure we ignore any device offsets from the GPMC partition
> -	 * allocated for the chip select and that the new base confirms
> -	 * to the GPMC 16MB minimum granularity.
> -	 */
> -	base &= ~(SZ_16M - 1);
> -
> -	gpmc_cs_get_memconf(cs, &old_base, &size);
> -	if (base == old_base)
> -		return 0;
> -
> -	ret = gpmc_cs_delete_mem(cs);
> -	if (ret < 0)
> -		return ret;
> -
> -	ret = gpmc_cs_insert_mem(cs, base, size);
> -	if (ret < 0)
> -		return ret;
> -
> -	ret = gpmc_cs_set_memconf(cs, base, size);
> -
> -	return ret;
> -}
> -
>   int gpmc_cs_request(int cs, unsigned long size, unsigned long *base)
>   {
>   	struct gpmc_cs_data *gpmc = &gpmc_cs[cs];
> @@ -1941,6 +1884,63 @@ static const struct of_device_id gpmc_dt_ids[] = {
>   	{ }
>   };
>   
> +static void gpmc_cs_set_name(int cs, const char *name)
> +{
> +	struct gpmc_cs_data *gpmc = &gpmc_cs[cs];
> +
> +	gpmc->name = name;
> +}
> +
> +static const char *gpmc_cs_get_name(int cs)
> +{
> +	struct gpmc_cs_data *gpmc = &gpmc_cs[cs];
> +
> +	return gpmc->name;
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * gpmc_cs_remap - remaps a chip-select physical base address
> + * @cs:		chip-select to remap
> + * @base:	physical base address to re-map chip-select to
> + *
> + * Re-maps a chip-select to a new physical base address specified by
> + * "base". Returns 0 on success and appropriate negative error code
> + * on failure.
> + */
> +static int gpmc_cs_remap(int cs, u32 base)
> +{
> +	int ret;
> +	u32 old_base, size;
> +
> +	if (cs >= gpmc_cs_num) {
> +		pr_err("%s: requested chip-select is disabled\n", __func__);
> +		return -ENODEV;
> +	}
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * Make sure we ignore any device offsets from the GPMC partition
> +	 * allocated for the chip select and that the new base confirms
> +	 * to the GPMC 16MB minimum granularity.
> +	 */
> +	base &= ~(SZ_16M - 1);
> +
> +	gpmc_cs_get_memconf(cs, &old_base, &size);
> +	if (base == old_base)
> +		return 0;
> +
> +	ret = gpmc_cs_delete_mem(cs);
> +	if (ret < 0)
> +		return ret;
> +
> +	ret = gpmc_cs_insert_mem(cs, base, size);
> +	if (ret < 0)
> +		return ret;
> +
> +	ret = gpmc_cs_set_memconf(cs, base, size);
> +
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +
>   /**
>    * gpmc_read_settings_dt - read gpmc settings from device-tree
>    * @np:		pointer to device-tree node for a gpmc child device
> 

-- 
Texas Instruments Finland Oy, Porkkalankatu 22, 00180 Helsinki.
Y-tunnus/Business ID: 0615521-4. Kotipaikka/Domicile: Helsinki

  reply	other threads:[~2020-09-01 12:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-09-01  3:56 [PATCH -next] memory: omap-gpmc: Fix -Wunused-function warnings YueHaibing
2020-09-01  6:52 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2020-09-01  6:58   ` Yuehaibing
2020-09-01  7:07 ` YueHaibing
2020-09-01  7:11   ` Yuehaibing
2020-09-01  7:09 ` [PATCH v2 " YueHaibing
2020-09-01 11:14   ` Roger Quadros
2020-09-01 11:28 ` [PATCH v3 " YueHaibing
2020-09-01 12:11   ` Roger Quadros [this message]
2020-09-02 15:29   ` Krzysztof Kozlowski

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=616e2369-13d1-b120-d1c2-bf8fea7f52b7@ti.com \
    --to=rogerq@ti.com \
    --cc=krzk@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tony@atomide.com \
    --cc=yuehaibing@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).