linux-omap.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "H. Nikolaus Schaller" <hns@goldelico.com>
To: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Cc: "Péter Ujfalusi" <peter.ujfalusi@gmail.com>,
	linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, Letux-kernel@openphoenux.org
Subject: Re: OMAP4/5 AESS on v6.4
Date: Thu, 25 May 2023 10:32:56 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <85922330-D19F-474A-9F23-F12CCAC68491@goldelico.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230525045340.GA14287@atomide.com>

Hi Tony,

> Am 25.05.2023 um 06:53 schrieb Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>:
> 
> * H. Nikolaus Schaller <hns@goldelico.com> [230524 07:40]:
>> Hi Tony and Peter,
>> I have upgraded my WIP tree to v6.4-rc3 now.
>> 
>> It is almost working, firmware can be built, and is loaded, subdevices are presented, graph
>> has been verified against the working 3.15 version, legacy sound works, amixer settings are
>> fine, etc.
>> 
>> The last remaining issue (before the next reveals itself) is that the AE DSP isn't running.
>> Playing a sound gets stuck in wait_for_avail() in sound/core/pcm_lib.c obviously waiting for 
>> some interrupt or DMA trigger from the DSP.
>> 
>> Kernel log/user-space symptoms are:
>> 
>> [   36.957956] omap-abe-twl6040 sound: playback write error (DMA or IRQ trouble?)
>> play WARN alsa: Input/output error
>> 
>> So it may either be a clocking or power issue or something with initialization.
>> Very difficult to find. Also symptomatic seems to be that I can hex-dump the /sys/kernel/debug
>> files for cmem, dmem, and smem but not pmem.
>> 
>> 
>> Therefore I am currently going once again through all questionable code where I
>> had noted a FIXME to tell that it is obviously not compatible to modern
>> kernels and has not yet been fixed.
>> 
>> 
>> One such place is
>> 
>> https://git.goldelico.com/?p=letux-kernel.git;a=blob;f=sound/soc/ti/aess/omap-aess-pcm.c;h=e9c8b9a00f032f336cac8cbb7e441ce8a7476507;hb=74db6d179bad60cdad29a8704f9e606f8cffccd3#l673
>> 
>> where there is a "context-lost mechanism" which was removed in v4.18.
>> 
>> Any ideas what that "context lost" is or how it can be fixed in modern kernels?
> 
> There does not seem to be a Linux framework directly usable for this, maybe
> the reset framework could be used with addition of some kind of reset status
> function.

I have not found the reference any more but it appears that there was some code
in the omap2 subsystem long time ago. But I may be wrong.

> 
> Initially for your driver, you could simply always restore the context in
> runtime PM resume to start with.

Ok, that should not harm.

> You could also check some driver registers for
> context lost status in the driver as the context lost registers are outside
> the driver IO range. And after that, using reset framework for context lost
> status could be done, maybe by adding support to drivers/soc/ti/omap_prm.c.

Ok. I'll look into that.
Maybe all this is not the reason why the driver doesn't work but who knows...

> 
>> You may also try or review the full tree:
>> 
>> https://git.goldelico.com/?p=letux-kernel.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/aess-6.4-rc3
>> 
>> I haven't tried that as a stand-alone without my other local Letux patches for my
>> devices, but I think it can run at least on PandaES and omap5uevm after configuring
>> omap2plus_defconfig.
>> 
>> Building firmware is best done on the device and running a script like this one:
>> 
>> https://git.goldelico.com/?p=letux-kernel.git;a=blob;f=Letux/root/build-aess-fw;h=0bfe59559e5395fb1e5ad32bbbac676d7665aa22;hb=refs/heads/letux-current
>> 
>> This clones the kernel git repo and tries to build the firmware on the target device.
>> I have only tested on Debian 9.13. Other releases may reveal subtle conflicts in system
>> include files...
>> 
>> 
>> Any help (also by readers) to get this beast finally working is welcome.
> 
> Based on a quick glance it looks like pretty much a standard Linux driver
> that loads firmware :)

Indeed. Most of the work I have done the past months (years?) was to update
the firmware load and build mechanisms to use the modern firmware APIs. And
track some significant changes in ALSA data structures.

I have now tested the current code on the omap5uevm using omap2plus_defconfig
which showed that I had to fix two issues. With these updates it works (update
force-pushed to
https://git.goldelico.com/?p=letux-kernel.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/aess-6.4-rc3).

One issue was an undefined reference to some aess function if CONFIG_SND_SOC_OMAP_AESS
was disabled (the default) and the other was the (not) well known limitation of DMA
channels to 32. So I have added a modification for the omap5uevm.dts to disable McSPI1 and
McSPI4 since they are not connected to the outside world and the pins are used
for something else. This frees enough DMA channels so that McPDM can use them.

Now it works either without CONFIG_SND_SOC_OMAP_AESS (default) in pure legacy
mode as before or with CONFIG_SND_SOC_OMAP_AESS and firmware. There I can
use device 11 for the legacy mode but device 5 reports the same
error coming from wait_for_avail().

To enable, either add CONFIG_SND_SOC_OMAP_AESS=y or CONFIG_SND_SOC_OMAP_AESS=m
to the omap2plus_defconfig.

No I wonder if this work can be upstreamed to staging? Including the firmware
source code (which makes it much easier to keep them in sync if they are part
of the same kernel tree and not a separate project and git repo)?

This could allow more developers to work on it.

But there is no "sound/staging" subdirectory and moving things to "drivers/staging/aess"
would interfere with existing "sound/soc/ti" which is also patched significantly
in this branch. So a separate staging location would split up code to too many locations.

Best regards,
Nikolaus

  reply	other threads:[~2023-05-25  8:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-05-23 15:21 OMAP4/5 AESS on v6.4 H. Nikolaus Schaller
2023-05-25  4:53 ` Tony Lindgren
2023-05-25  8:32   ` H. Nikolaus Schaller [this message]
2023-05-26  5:09     ` Tony Lindgren
2023-05-26  6:21       ` Tony Lindgren

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=85922330-D19F-474A-9F23-F12CCAC68491@goldelico.com \
    --to=hns@goldelico.com \
    --cc=Letux-kernel@openphoenux.org \
    --cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=peter.ujfalusi@gmail.com \
    --cc=tony@atomide.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).