From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.7 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76397C433E6 for ; Fri, 12 Feb 2021 08:32:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 227AD64E70 for ; Fri, 12 Feb 2021 08:32:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229521AbhBLIcw (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Feb 2021 03:32:52 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:46250 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229719AbhBLIcs (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Feb 2021 03:32:48 -0500 Received: from mail-lf1-x12d.google.com (mail-lf1-x12d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::12d]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 83ED7C061788 for ; Fri, 12 Feb 2021 00:32:07 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-lf1-x12d.google.com with SMTP id f1so11990910lfu.3 for ; Fri, 12 Feb 2021 00:32:07 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=hyslWWiTvci465Koa7xfon0gMi1z5RLHZfOG18JU7cc=; b=IRgwFVlCCOQ5uqf/YVamdpdVEzvDmFn3sSw6RdHiXyoh93ZFUgO/deQuaLdeXVgba9 v+mvA4dVyOelmp/8ceXo8VVjUrpMD/T5xC3EclHjSGECURN1iVHz+lGKWuePZv6CMxRt R8oAa5EQOW3TJBl6OELuNfojjK7mBt7opyA4mzxTuC03gfB67lMpYyUwGiz43Q723yng sgTDeE1TBC7GbrWhbbY2Q+sdaK0syZD4KXruFTIfnILJhlbrOdYWgaJmEUike8DCt7CB T2l/gO9hJn5I1ZRQyRRdB5kI24trbUPjr12wuCmG0TcpZWr7uXVjqkEbcslM6olvjbYK boIQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=hyslWWiTvci465Koa7xfon0gMi1z5RLHZfOG18JU7cc=; b=lFBPmoVQLFkZ4GivrcttYd3C54ppon/vEaeXl/O5XenVphlH7rx3IR4HNcuQ1GXq0B t0rxC8EmvMccLewERx3zL1LgIzOlujJYEddVaC+rV98lrXw7+MMtpFUOg8w0Tbjn8RjH 3iDruCn23tWbplFDucS0OOc/icR1/l91/C8DCHxcfPx5xeuJ4j76ZL4Aj+EnWSnUjtvw DDlKpQM5PxosKeS6TVyCs4QL80D6ZtCz7J9PTxFLzEmhTR66O+7WXyvKbZamYcI5eKmQ u1Si8ruYIoLWzx8D7gCOzlP+gs75SPEevwiVz9MC8jKPIQ64bAfgfEAq1Pusyomhmada r0rQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532oVhwzMPRb2T0mzuKcgnqFrTACEd/I/NJ3ceSmYMgc5DKpxZKJ /nesjVg/SIn06vvr4D/5aQRrIchZtrV0z3qRZFXT1Q== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJymP53EmmQdv4O6ZSqB6sTRScfeEAE7CyOPBeEyDkLGYfMldAHByLhb4sQwv+aeMF1tY69nVpNY4ZuChk0BdP4= X-Received: by 2002:a19:6b06:: with SMTP id d6mr1084443lfa.29.1613118725940; Fri, 12 Feb 2021 00:32:05 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20210127000303.436595-1-drew@beagleboard.org> <20210204074658.GA271881@x1> In-Reply-To: <20210204074658.GA271881@x1> From: Linus Walleij Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2021 09:31:54 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] ARM: dts: am335x-pocketbeagle: unique gpio-line-names To: Drew Fustini Cc: Tony Lindgren , =?UTF-8?Q?Beno=C3=AEt_Cousson?= , Rob Herring , Linux-OMAP , "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Jason Kridner , Robert Nelson , Bjorn Andersson , Bartosz Golaszewski , "open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Feb 4, 2021 at 8:47 AM Drew Fustini wrote: > On Thu, Feb 04, 2021 at 08:58:20AM +0200, Tony Lindgren wrote: > > * Drew Fustini [210127 02:04]: > > > Based on linux-gpio discussion [1], it is best practice to make the > > > gpio-line-names unique. Generic names like "[ethernet]" are replaced > > > with the name of the unique signal on the AM3358 SoC ball corresponding > > > to the gpio line. "[NC]" is also renamed to the standard "NC" name to > > > represent "not connected". > > > > > > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-gpio/20201216195357.GA2583366@x1/ > > > > So are these needed for v5.12 as fixes, or can these wait until after > > the merge window for v5.13? > > > > Regards, > > > > Tony > > I suppose it depends on if/when the patches to make gpio lines unique > go in. I believe the last response from Linus W. was in mid-December > and indicated he holding off merging as it was immature [1] There is no hurry with that plus I hold that patch back indefinately as it seems. I want to make line names unique for devices not probing from DT but DT devices, I dunno. Yours, Linus Walleij