From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B283C4363C for ; Wed, 7 Oct 2020 06:26:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A3D7206F0 for ; Wed, 7 Oct 2020 06:26:06 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1602051966; bh=9J6pd4Urt8nLaYajtW0xX9CVZZNmrwIcH02wFm6GCzo=; h=References:In-Reply-To:From:Date:Subject:To:Cc:List-ID:From; b=kMnNPpD3uGyt49IUH73gq//Sx0lTvZSHbWUaTFWE8dS8NdZwR3DuMuejzHQ9lUFjD KFu47da9nkQ5LWXeZMJnzgTudC+qgOgNdOl36MqhDU3E4ig+rgA4Y51/ticU5RybMx 5kCJxBStFNYxiwc0osPGrLpSv41W7WjbNyQhbjZo= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727250AbgJGG0C (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Oct 2020 02:26:02 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:46006 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725970AbgJGG0C (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Oct 2020 02:26:02 -0400 Received: from mail-ed1-f53.google.com (mail-ed1-f53.google.com [209.85.208.53]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AC69221531; Wed, 7 Oct 2020 06:26:00 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1602051961; bh=9J6pd4Urt8nLaYajtW0xX9CVZZNmrwIcH02wFm6GCzo=; h=References:In-Reply-To:From:Date:Subject:To:Cc:From; b=cjP10fipeHTdrU/XdlnBVJ7nEBd1DP/mHTZ4wefjHHoLp9lxNvYU9bP5xkqznMJxe wdl3FjyjprNsFoIgfs4MvjUw8+2mX9yOGKdDx/q7PdKmPRqW4i18tmFXSJXv87xb/w jYTrYjlyVbMDlYgJfvP/m4NxZ5TcwBYezWVwQrWs= Received: by mail-ed1-f53.google.com with SMTP id t21so925268eds.6; Tue, 06 Oct 2020 23:26:00 -0700 (PDT) X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530pnQbCX/Wfw4gFW4sJnl0D9pyL7OzzwdjDQTdcsuEfdSR6ObD4 oavjcPDY2io3rAY8m8nUo3P5JNDVPiUI/ffdeZo= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzlgSjYiE8Nro65NAUBEhu5or+8YJ/UtMdDrVp9y+cPmyFnaghXEP0Rg3rNv4h1igGfmvWPgDizOURlpLSk7PM= X-Received: by 2002:a50:a452:: with SMTP id v18mr1834674edb.143.1602051959063; Tue, 06 Oct 2020 23:25:59 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20201005203451.9985-1-post@lespocky.de> <20201005203451.9985-8-post@lespocky.de> In-Reply-To: <20201005203451.9985-8-post@lespocky.de> From: Krzysztof Kozlowski Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2020 08:25:47 +0200 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 07/12] ARM: dts: exynos: Fix schema warnings for pwm-leds To: Alexander Dahl Cc: Pavel Machek , Dan Murphy , Rob Herring , Alexander Dahl , Jacek Anaszewski , linux-leds@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, "linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org" , linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com, linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, Kukjin Kim Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 5 Oct 2020 at 22:36, Alexander Dahl wrote: > > The node names for devices using the pwm-leds driver follow a certain > naming scheme (now). Parent node name is not enforced, but recommended > by DT project. > > DTC arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5410-odroidxu.dt.yaml > CHECK arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5410-odroidxu.dt.yaml > /home/alex/build/linux/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5410-odroidxu.dt.yaml: pwmleds: 'blueled', 'greenled' do not match any of the regexes: '^led(-[0-9a-f]+)?$', 'pinctrl-[0-9]+' > From schema: /home/alex/src/linux/leds/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/leds-pwm.yaml > DTC arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5422-odroidhc1.dt.yaml > CHECK arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5422-odroidhc1.dt.yaml > /home/alex/build/linux/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5422-odroidhc1.dt.yaml: pwmleds: 'blueled' does not match any of the regexes: '^led(-[0-9a-f]+)?$', 'pinctrl-[0-9]+' > From schema: /home/alex/src/linux/leds/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/leds-pwm.yaml > DTC arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5422-odroidxu3.dt.yaml > CHECK arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5422-odroidxu3.dt.yaml > /home/alex/build/linux/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5422-odroidxu3.dt.yaml: pwmleds: 'blueled', 'greenled' do not match any of the regexes: '^led(-[0-9a-f]+)?$', 'pinctrl-[0-9]+' > From schema: /home/alex/src/linux/leds/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/leds-pwm.yaml > DTC arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5422-odroidxu3-lite.dt.yaml > CHECK arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5422-odroidxu3-lite.dt.yaml > /home/alex/build/linux/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5422-odroidxu3-lite.dt.yaml: pwmleds: 'blueled', 'greenled' do not match any of the regexes: '^led(-[0-9a-f]+)?$', 'pinctrl-[0-9]+' > From schema: /home/alex/src/linux/leds/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/leds-pwm.yaml > DTC arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5422-odroidxu4.dt.yaml > CHECK arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5422-odroidxu4.dt.yaml > /home/alex/build/linux/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5422-odroidxu4.dt.yaml: pwmleds: 'blueled' does not match any of the regexes: '^led(-[0-9a-f]+)?$', 'pinctrl-[0-9]+' > From schema: /home/alex/src/linux/leds/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/leds-pwm.yaml > > Signed-off-by: Alexander Dahl > --- > > Notes: > v6 -> v7: > * split up patch (one per sub arch) > * added actual warnings to commit message > > arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5422-odroidhc1.dts | 4 ++-- > arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5422-odroidxu4.dts | 4 ++-- > arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos54xx-odroidxu-leds.dtsi | 11 ++++++----- > 3 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) Looks OK but it is too late for this cycle. I'll pick it up after merge window. Best regards, Krzysztof