From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Paul Walmsley Subject: Re: [PATCH] OMAP: MMC: recover from transfer failures - Resend Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 17:09:48 -0700 (MST) Message-ID: References: <20081207213617.10456.43951.stgit@localhost> <20090205121045.4022c319.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <200902061422.32689.jpihet@mvista.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Return-path: Received: from utopia.booyaka.com ([72.9.107.138]:44134 "EHLO utopia.booyaka.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752885AbZBJAJu (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Feb 2009 19:09:50 -0500 In-Reply-To: <200902061422.32689.jpihet@mvista.com> Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org To: Jean Pihet Cc: Andrew Morton , tony@atomide.com, ext-adrian.hunter@nokia.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.arm.linux.org.uk, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, jarkko.lavinen@nokia.com, drzeus-mmc@drzeus.cx, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 6 Feb 2009, Jean Pihet wrote: > Do you want a finite loop with udelay in it? I located 4 places were this > could be used. If so I can generate a new patch for that. Just as an aside, from the standpoint of minimizing CPU usage, there seems little point in using udelay() here, since it is implemented as a CPU busy-wait. - Paul