From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F1CAC76188 for ; Mon, 22 Jul 2019 08:08:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0790C21E70 for ; Mon, 22 Jul 2019 08:08:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726973AbfGVIIz (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Jul 2019 04:08:55 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:47594 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726952AbfGVIIz (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Jul 2019 04:08:55 -0400 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 10D6B2F8BC9; Mon, 22 Jul 2019 08:08:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from redhat.com (ovpn-120-233.rdu2.redhat.com [10.10.120.233]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41D3F5FCA3; Mon, 22 Jul 2019 08:08:46 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2019 04:08:44 -0400 From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" To: Jason Wang Cc: syzbot , aarcange@redhat.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, christian@brauner.io, davem@davemloft.net, ebiederm@xmission.com, elena.reshetova@intel.com, guro@fb.com, hch@infradead.org, james.bottomley@hansenpartnership.com, jglisse@redhat.com, keescook@chromium.org, ldv@altlinux.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org, luto@amacapital.net, mhocko@suse.com, mingo@kernel.org, namit@vmware.com, peterz@infradead.org, syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, wad@chromium.org Subject: Re: WARNING in __mmdrop Message-ID: <20190722040230-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> References: <0000000000008dd6bb058e006938@google.com> <000000000000964b0d058e1a0483@google.com> <20190721044615-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> <20190721081447-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> <85dd00e2-37a6-72b7-5d5a-8bf46a3526cf@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <85dd00e2-37a6-72b7-5d5a-8bf46a3526cf@redhat.com> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.12 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.38]); Mon, 22 Jul 2019 08:08:54 +0000 (UTC) Sender: linux-parisc-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 01:24:24PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: > > On 2019/7/21 下午8:18, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > On Sun, Jul 21, 2019 at 06:02:52AM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > > On Sat, Jul 20, 2019 at 03:08:00AM -0700, syzbot wrote: > > > > syzbot has bisected this bug to: > > > > > > > > commit 7f466032dc9e5a61217f22ea34b2df932786bbfc > > > > Author: Jason Wang > > > > Date: Fri May 24 08:12:18 2019 +0000 > > > > > > > > vhost: access vq metadata through kernel virtual address > > > > > > > > bisection log:https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/bisect.txt?x=149a8a20600000 > > > > start commit: 6d21a41b Add linux-next specific files for 20190718 > > > > git tree: linux-next > > > > final crash:https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/report.txt?x=169a8a20600000 > > > > console output:https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=129a8a20600000 > > > > kernel config:https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=3430a151e1452331 > > > > dashboard link:https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=e58112d71f77113ddb7b > > > > syz repro:https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/repro.syz?x=10139e68600000 > > > > > > > > Reported-by:syzbot+e58112d71f77113ddb7b@syzkaller.appspotmail.com > > > > Fixes: 7f466032dc9e ("vhost: access vq metadata through kernel virtual > > > > address") > > > > > > > > For information about bisection process see:https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ#bisection > > > OK I poked at this for a bit, I see several things that > > > we need to fix, though I'm not yet sure it's the reason for > > > the failures: > > > > > > > > > 1. mmu_notifier_register shouldn't be called from vhost_vring_set_num_addr > > > That's just a bad hack, in particular I don't think device > > > mutex is taken and so poking at two VQs will corrupt > > > memory. > > > So what to do? How about a per vq notifier? > > > Of course we also have synchronize_rcu > > > in the notifier which is slow and is now going to be called twice. > > > I think call_rcu would be more appropriate here. > > > We then need rcu_barrier on module unload. > > > OTOH if we make pages linear with map then we are good > > > with kfree_rcu which is even nicer. > > > > > > 2. Doesn't map leak after vhost_map_unprefetch? > > > And why does it poke at contents of the map? > > > No one should use it right? > > > > > > 3. notifier unregister happens last in vhost_dev_cleanup, > > > but register happens first. This looks wrong to me. > > > > > > 4. OK so we use the invalidate count to try and detect that > > > some invalidate is in progress. > > > I am not 100% sure why do we care. > > > Assuming we do, uaddr can change between start and end > > > and then the counter can get negative, or generally > > > out of sync. > > > > > > So what to do about all this? > > > I am inclined to say let's just drop the uaddr optimization > > > for now. E.g. kvm invalidates unconditionally. > > > 3 should be fixed independently. > > Above implements this but is only build-tested. > > Jason, pls take a look. If you like the approach feel > > free to take it from here. > > > > One thing the below does not have is any kind of rate-limiting. > > Given it's so easy to restart I'm thinking it makes sense > > to add a generic infrastructure for this. > > Can be a separate patch I guess. > > > I don't get why must use kfree_rcu() instead of synchronize_rcu() here. synchronize_rcu has very high latency on busy systems. It is not something that should be used on a syscall path. KVM had to switch to SRCU to keep it sane. Otherwise one guest can trivially slow down another one. > > > > > Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin > > > Let me try to figure out the root cause then decide whether or not to go for > this way. > > Thanks The root cause of the crash is relevant, but we still need to fix issues 1-4. More issues (my patch tries to fix them too): 5. page not dirtied when mappings are torn down outside of invalidate callback 6. potential cross-VM DOS by one guest keeping system busy and increasing synchronize_rcu latency to the point where another guest stars timing out and crashes -- MST