From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09654C3A5A6 for ; Thu, 19 Sep 2019 20:31:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC7B1207FC for ; Thu, 19 Sep 2019 20:31:46 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=duncanthrax.net header.i=@duncanthrax.net header.b="PVsxZf+g" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2388145AbfISUbq (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Sep 2019 16:31:46 -0400 Received: from smtp.duncanthrax.net ([89.31.1.170]:49170 "EHLO smtp.duncanthrax.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2387854AbfISUbq (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Sep 2019 16:31:46 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=duncanthrax.net; s=dkim; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date; bh=a6NdcU33Bx4aQeV3CboJshOFL1ALJJW5J50WL/j+jj0=; b=PVsxZf+gY1CJZuDx2pQvZDM3Dq Ekwc9dtM4eCc5MxEIHXSSALJYFoFmNJL/86yi+1Zfcvxaeq+3O4WfMMLnBbThKAOj4yC1vmHC+8pb YTUwWPLV33v5FxTNE8l2Uz+uyKWN/LgCkJ3vTzN0nDGQm3TcE0JZF8tRr0xCI9UJn+vU=; Received: from hsi-kbw-046-005-233-221.hsi8.kabel-badenwuerttemberg.de ([46.5.233.221] helo=t470p.stackframe.org) by smtp.eurescom.eu with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iB35S-00028A-Cx; Thu, 19 Sep 2019 22:31:34 +0200 Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2019 22:31:32 +0200 From: Sven Schnelle To: Helge Deller Cc: John David Anglin , Arlie Davis , Andrew Lunn , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Bug report (with fix) for DEC Tulip driver (de2104x.c) Message-ID: <20190919203132.GA9107@t470p.stackframe.org> References: <20190917212844.GJ9591@lunn.ch> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Sender: linux-parisc-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org Hi, On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 07:56:16AM +0200, Helge Deller wrote: > On 18.09.19 00:51, John David Anglin wrote: > > On 2019-09-17 5:36 p.m., Arlie Davis wrote: > >> Likewise, I'm at a loss for testing with real hardware. It's hard to > >> find such things, now. > > How does de2104x compare to ds2142/43?  I have a c3750 with ds2142/43 tulip.  Helge > > or some others might have a machine with a de2104x. > > The machines we could test are > * a C240 with a DS21140 tulip chip (Sven has one), My C240 identifies as C240+: [ 0.000000] model 9000/782/C240+ which has a 21143 (verified by looking at the board): root@c240:/# lspci -kvvnn -s 00:14.0 00:14.0 Ethernet controller [0200]: Digital Equipment Corporation DECchip 21142/43 [1011:0019] (rev 30) Subsystem: Hewlett-Packard Company DECchip 21142/43 [103c:104f] Control: I/O+ Mem+ BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV+ VGASnoop- ParErr+ Stepping- SERR+ FastB2B- DisINTx- Status: Cap- 66MHz- UDF- FastB2B+ ParErr- DEVSEL=medium >TAbort- SERR-