From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A49DC04AB1 for ; Sat, 11 May 2019 21:41:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A258217D6 for ; Sat, 11 May 2019 21:41:54 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="pZwaeW2U" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726043AbfEKVlx (ORCPT ); Sat, 11 May 2019 17:41:53 -0400 Received: from mail-yw1-f67.google.com ([209.85.161.67]:34605 "EHLO mail-yw1-f67.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726033AbfEKVlx (ORCPT ); Sat, 11 May 2019 17:41:53 -0400 Received: by mail-yw1-f67.google.com with SMTP id n76so7750815ywd.1 for ; Sat, 11 May 2019 14:41:53 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=kslLq1HdRpn/Bl+/gHpimzVAvV0p4CrVLtoYUhFbRNU=; b=pZwaeW2UCDkvU9AmOBAS/qaHCV+VvD77NSNFdjM3sskCyaV6OBT0IaFjdzBUtTzh2T qGexCVC2H/cH5nw0pnQc1hXrMIG+TnN85mpPb94EMjICCxq5OeTOuFz2ePsKR5npp7s3 VnvFXN6ze0UcVXcoNPZv7UYfvXDD8PyD0FY8/rpW2qqKGlfKBMR+NXs5Do3yHl9lOht6 6YK3dPOf7/YRVvgx90ACqV4jUxMSqaYA5UuIpFQ9CVjufZjF0Sa3nDgOQhUsMyWVHEVq wIUqpzqSWJzr/ZR9gi+/RvlgqlGQxAYrO/CoSFiIRuYlXjfUZv7Ddnrpjof8AdY4Ut80 70XA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=kslLq1HdRpn/Bl+/gHpimzVAvV0p4CrVLtoYUhFbRNU=; b=h2WPQJQ6+LO1YWhaZrHA4Y6w2EXfnHKzcGbRx5e+DvXlh3wl5/WQS7ZM1W8JqziET4 lTpg9kPyz+BRWob1q7hkoPt4jDhC2onHmJxPzFba0EhMIGnLZsI/hZwD8dFKEs2OyCUf t+lLqnsJRj82xZdmss1/xyvjbAccqMUPAglfGY8fibajdwchvImFU44GgKm3t7hVvIGz aQv0x92Ct9k3h2VcrOHHczmfsM4/uDoBNnBlt8fIoOKUH9XN8+KjDLh6llW3W68yMENl 2aZDPuiZMJbnTuDQsNncW1QEjR+fVfnv2n695DTO4wbHzcDIV2MoJoqRjDl4heW7uo/p 7aDw== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAW4cSCxSyxCPEmSQL8gqf//Sy+Sl4m0ltuJKgHom+QKQLoTGPyL Q7oOtSRGpLCFF9XAtDSrprvVKjZVbisAH1ZTsgc= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxcGbI84OWY4OD7Q8XC8YBw2jqxRTAEiAKQQv0e1+PkQFEVacm/ICL93D/HT/zFDC3/lWBlyfiinHjEBQwuVp0= X-Received: by 2002:a81:ad20:: with SMTP id l32mr2169371ywh.62.1557610912885; Sat, 11 May 2019 14:41:52 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <325c8de3-3869-08d1-696d-b89f5813d537@gmx.de> In-Reply-To: <325c8de3-3869-08d1-696d-b89f5813d537@gmx.de> From: Carlo Pisani Date: Sat, 11 May 2019 23:41:25 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: 5.2 hppa merge seems to work on my machines To: Helge Deller Cc: Meelis Roos , linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-parisc-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org guys, bad news! as described here (1) we are testing several sata controllers by a script that 1) copy a very big file cp data_16GB.bin copy.bin 2) compare the md5sum for checking the integrity we have a couple of SIL24 controllers, and they both work but only with small files <8Gbyte trying to copy a big file, 16GB, results in the following HPMC error A Data I/O Fetch Timeout occurred while CPU 0 was requesting information from a device at the path 10/6/2/0 (PCI slot 2). I have uploaded a ser-pim-log there for more details, it's related to the Marvell MV88SX6081's sata controller, but I have the same behavior with a Silicon Image Sil3124 controller I am on the last kernel v5.1 from the git repository. Performances are, in both cases, very low: something about 10Mbyte/sec, which is ... really too low Tomorrow I will try the old 4.16, which I remember to be more stable with the SIL24 controller. (1) http://www.downthebunker.com/reloaded/space/viewtopic.php?f=50&p=1618 p.s. has anyone ever tried an FC adapter on an FC-bridge? Il giorno mer 8 mag 2019 alle ore 21:15 Helge Deller ha scritto: > > On 08.05.19 16:23, Meelis Roos wrote: > > Just tested v5.1-5445-g80f232121b69 git on A180c, rp2450, rp2470, > > rp3410 and rp3440 and it seems to work everywhere for me. > > Great! > Thanks for testing, Meelis! > > Helge