From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D72DC43331 for ; Mon, 11 Nov 2019 19:33:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CCFE21E6F for ; Mon, 11 Nov 2019 19:33:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727842AbfKKTdk (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Nov 2019 14:33:40 -0500 Received: from mout.kundenserver.de ([212.227.17.24]:39367 "EHLO mout.kundenserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727797AbfKKTdj (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Nov 2019 14:33:39 -0500 Received: from mail-qk1-f179.google.com ([209.85.222.179]) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (mreue107 [212.227.15.145]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1N3bCH-1hmQ3w3kY7-010fCN; Mon, 11 Nov 2019 20:33:36 +0100 Received: by mail-qk1-f179.google.com with SMTP id h15so12180561qka.13; Mon, 11 Nov 2019 11:33:34 -0800 (PST) X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXXUehROR4hg16SrGsmLkhlWeNJFltpGV8/mDO3s1mh8skoqwjh tY/46NCrVFjCjJg/qAPgy/4Ru1VJxk+kMV3sub8= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzRT3LvGe5JvZLYKm1upZpHxk2xc9ns43ZUwTpi/JlFXD7dYhA8+4Mt4XVDG2f3/qLjEL/Ms2I9EThmbgvV8Jg= X-Received: by 2002:a37:58d:: with SMTP id 135mr2321779qkf.394.1573500813881; Mon, 11 Nov 2019 11:33:33 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20191029064834.23438-1-hch@lst.de> <20191029064834.23438-11-hch@lst.de> <20191111101531.GA12294@lst.de> <20191111102923.GA12974@lst.de> In-Reply-To: <20191111102923.GA12974@lst.de> From: Arnd Bergmann Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2019 20:33:17 +0100 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/21] asm-generic: ioremap_uc should behave the same with and without MMU To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: Guo Ren , Michal Simek , Greentime Hu , Vincent Chen , Guan Xuetao , "the arch/x86 maintainers" , alpha , "open list:SYNOPSYS ARC ARCHITECTURE" , Linux ARM , "open list:QUALCOMM HEXAGON..." , linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, linux-m68k , linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, "moderated list:NIOS2 ARCHITECTURE" , openrisc@lists.librecores.org, Parisc List , linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-s390 , Linux-sh list , sparclinux , linux-xtensa@linux-xtensa.org, linux-mtd , linux-arch , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:VkzlYprmjLZkUUcNJ+eTrkc1uyTcHlM+BFAEE68s21ucomSZQaJ Mq1HsbOKR10W9ktsWQqC2d+1fxNFc++gSh355I/Sm9Nt0OELiCU5GE/ejcbxdc0XoKGFGOR lJT0aj3OKGGsrqrwmqhZcVjRTdGYhtUjAmaLqUrUWTfS9gPcJXopxjb/cHOb3V99Jjg8KyM BDe7AsIZLiGgQ+SW18UXg== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:hdS04Xdlzj8=:M/ucaK4r3dinqbK80C41xd FMDjqQL3YWPxy6jHWBpvqKj9qZWP8X6dfE8RQCodF9mGe6XJZOKEt4p5phfvsuDjwfDAuR77q 5sbXk3f1gGuA3fUl2kc50FhfPxqpKsTvCyJ9PMoA1vJWANud2ysKvaSTXrsxfuBDYbDYflWwD FkAIhnavF1mnucw3hAUZbu/DkQc78rhm6yA66+iyf0ibiFIB1fiFKcy3QWM1WJMSymvmz+Cik 0TMLecIni73LtmjHaEJqdQ07OpzRu6o2+nc6q2bAY8v58NfnuF4PC+RAMX5jsCwhiMQuTAAzH d9cCFvrdweO5pjBwUMsl1fDngiL0PhMkFoHuG2mp6WTu+9yigHaCDYkLBnzqo3wCtFy+yT589 vZ/FGbV4Lx/67Cyy8ORfHd/Q4I+ytFVw6wwtG0/mHwHZbYfS5buusBz3lQKNPLkaAr33vhbEI HXyb+ZMaKffgQFt++5lnGgDgUJQspoUegjhdEeGEI5XiZQJLi3elBg+C5Gkccpc1LDKrpW2ka YjGgj5260Lt3d8KDG/qdbMttJAKgU/xdQzH2MW0jtDV/+7cUj/sApumoILyv1cXORKI+bqwSx ogfAEpKRHtcZ3qEtQueZhW8Xu+2e019UPGPVU0qRA4v2G6oIRAzpinHe15u698zmzbDymL58Y lwxjoo4VbkwFV/6Hr98ctBchu4Q9vloUQ/pqLZpaLK1ga8iZgXmf+PzlaojeIr0ObdDBvevEx 7OZcdxrTy7Y1NqggNs6PW94MGROjlUKfXkY5V9wZiL5kUIPMuEbzKs1fxUg2d59L21Tn3fP6m i7fEXDMKusM1lgLeJl9N0qIk4SBBs+5bFUkc1R6uO78ROGzNzWdO/juF7AjegP2MSh3mgCkLn JUwmUH8sWRrwHApJ0rkA== Sender: linux-parisc-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Nov 11, 2019 at 11:29 AM Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 11, 2019 at 11:27:27AM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > Ok, fair enough. Let's just go with your version for now, if only to not > > hold your series up more. I'd still suggest we change atyfb to only > > use ioremap_uc() on i386 and maybe ia64. I can send a patch for that. > > I don't think we even need it on ia64. But lets kick off a dicussion > with the atyfb, x86 and ia64 maintainers after this series is in. > Which was kinda my plan anyway. I missed your reply and already sent my patch now. I guess it doesn't hurt to discuss that in parallel. Anyway I think that this patch is the last one you want an Ack from me for (let me know if I missed one), so Reviewed-by: Arnd Bergmann