From: Peter Newman <peternewman@google.com>
To: "Yu, Fenghua" <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
Cc: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@intel.com>,
"Chatre, Reinette" <reinette.chatre@intel.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
"x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>,
Shaopeng Tan <tan.shaopeng@fujitsu.com>,
James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
Jamie Iles <quic_jiles@quicinc.com>,
Babu Moger <babu.moger@amd.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-doc@vger.kernel.org" <linux-doc@vger.kernel.org>,
"patches@lists.linux.dev" <patches@lists.linux.dev>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/7] x86/resctrl: Add a new node-scoped resource to rdt_resources_all[]
Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2023 17:02:15 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CALPaoCiFotg80LJZ3d+QeO=bNUh85AuP2VgmLaWXX7JaAMYfLQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <IA1PR11MB6097400A3056553FCC8E193C9BCC9@IA1PR11MB6097.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Hi Tony,
On Fri, Jan 27, 2023 at 6:25 AM Yu, Fenghua <fenghua.yu@intel.com> wrote:
>
> On 1/26/23 10:41, Tony Luck wrote:
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/core.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/core.c
> > index 6914232acf84..19be6fe42ef3 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/core.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/core.c
> > @@ -100,6 +100,16 @@ struct rdt_hw_resource rdt_resources_all[] = {
> > .fflags = RFTYPE_RES_MB,
> > },
> > },
> > + [RDT_RESOURCE_NODE] =
> > + {
> > + .r_resctrl = {
> > + .rid = RDT_RESOURCE_NODE,
> > + .name = "L3",
> "L3" was named as RDT_RESOURCE_L3 already. The duplicate name here may
> cause duplicate file names in info dir. Maybe rename it as "L3_NODE"?
I'm trying to get some feedback from our own users on whether changing
the directory names would bother them. At least from my own testing, I
did learn to appreciate the interface change a bit more: I needed an
SNC and non-SNC case to correctly predict which mon_data subdirectory
the data would appear in.
I was able to confirm that this change allows bandwidth to be counted
on RMID/CPU combos where it didn't work before on an SNC2
configuration.
If I'm understanding this correctly, it might be helpful to highlight
that the extra resource is needed to allow a different number of L3
domains in L3 monitoring vs allocation.
Thanks!
-Peter
Tested-By: Peter Newman <peternewman@google.com>
Reviewed-By: Peter Newman <peternewman@google.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-01-27 16:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-01-26 18:41 [PATCH 0/7] x86/resctrl: Add support for Sub-NUMA cluster (SNC) systems Tony Luck
2023-01-26 18:41 ` [PATCH 1/7] x86/resctrl: Refactor in preparation for node-scoped resources Tony Luck
2023-01-26 18:41 ` [PATCH 2/7] x86/resctrl: Remove hard code of RDT_RESOURCE_L3 in monitor.c Tony Luck
2023-01-27 4:51 ` Yu, Fenghua
2023-01-26 18:41 ` [PATCH 3/7] x86/resctrl: Add a new node-scoped resource to rdt_resources_all[] Tony Luck
2023-01-27 5:24 ` Yu, Fenghua
2023-01-27 16:02 ` Peter Newman [this message]
2023-01-27 18:23 ` Luck, Tony
2023-01-28 2:25 ` Yu, Fenghua
2023-01-28 2:22 ` Yu, Fenghua
2023-01-28 2:36 ` Yu, Fenghua
2023-01-30 19:04 ` Luck, Tony
2023-02-28 14:27 ` Moger, Babu
2023-02-28 17:05 ` Luck, Tony
2023-01-26 18:41 ` [PATCH 4/7] x86/resctrl: Add code to setup monitoring at L3 or NODE scope Tony Luck
2023-02-28 17:13 ` James Morse
2023-02-28 17:28 ` Luck, Tony
2023-01-26 18:41 ` [PATCH 5/7] x86/resctrl: Add a new "snc_ways" file to the monitoring info directory Tony Luck
2023-02-28 17:13 ` James Morse
2023-02-28 17:44 ` Luck, Tony
2023-03-03 18:32 ` James Morse
2023-01-26 18:41 ` [PATCH 6/7] x86/resctrl: Update documentation with Sub-NUMA cluster changes Tony Luck
2023-02-28 17:14 ` James Morse
2023-01-26 18:41 ` [PATCH 7/7] x86/resctrl: Determine if Sub-NUMA Cluster is enabled and initialize Tony Luck
2023-02-27 13:30 ` Peter Newman
2023-03-10 17:30 ` Tony Luck
2023-03-13 9:19 ` Peter Newman
2023-03-13 16:38 ` Luck, Tony
2023-02-28 19:51 ` Moger, Babu
2023-03-14 20:23 ` Tony Luck
[not found] ` <85d7e70a-b9c8-6551-b1ac-229b51ee18d7@amd.com>
2023-02-28 20:39 ` Luck, Tony
2023-02-28 22:31 ` Moger, Babu
2023-02-28 17:12 ` [PATCH 0/7] x86/resctrl: Add support for Sub-NUMA cluster (SNC) systems James Morse
2023-02-28 18:04 ` Luck, Tony
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CALPaoCiFotg80LJZ3d+QeO=bNUh85AuP2VgmLaWXX7JaAMYfLQ@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=peternewman@google.com \
--cc=babu.moger@amd.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=fenghua.yu@intel.com \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=patches@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=quic_jiles@quicinc.com \
--cc=reinette.chatre@intel.com \
--cc=tan.shaopeng@fujitsu.com \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).