linux-pci.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: xxm <xxm@rock-chips.com>
To: "Krzysztof Wilczyński" <kw@linux.com>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>,
	Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org, robh+dt@kernel.org,
	Johan Jonker <jbx6244@gmail.com>,
	Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] dt-bindings: rockchip: Add DesignWare based PCIe controller【请注意,邮件由kswilczynski@gmail.com代发】
Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2021 12:19:03 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <01e5ef9b-aef1-64ed-88e6-de74ea3e3e5b@rock-chips.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YDMZB94qMkpOx38Q@rocinante>

Hi Krzysztof,

在 2021/2/22 10:37, Krzysztof Wilczyński 写道:
> Hi Simon,
>
> [...]
>> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0 OR BSD-2-Clause)
> The driver is only based on GPL v2.0, should this be the same, or is
> there a reason for dual-license?
Will remove BSD-2-Clause
> [...]
>> +title: DesignWare based PCIe RC controller on Rockchip SoCs
> [...]
>
> What does the "RC" here stands for?  Would it be "Rockchip"?  If so,
> then perhaps dropping it would be fine to do, as rest of the title
> mentions "Rockchip SoCs"."  What do you think?

RC = Root Complex, just to distinguish "EP"(End Point), but drop "RC" 
seems fine.

Simon

> Krzysztof
>
>
>



      reply	other threads:[~2021-02-22  4:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-01-27  2:24 [PATCH v4 1/2] dt-bindings: rockchip: Add DesignWare based PCIe controller Simon Xue
2021-01-27  2:25 ` [PATCH v4 2/2] PCI: rockchip: add " Simon Xue
2021-02-22  0:59   ` xxm
2021-02-22  2:28   ` Krzysztof Wilczyński
2021-02-22  4:52     ` [PATCH v4 2/2] PCI: rockchip: add DesignWare based PCIe controller【请注意,邮件由kswilczynski@gmail.com代发】 xxm
2021-02-22  0:59 ` [PATCH v4 1/2] dt-bindings: rockchip: Add DesignWare based PCIe controller xxm
2021-02-22  2:37 ` Krzysztof Wilczyński
2021-02-22  4:19   ` xxm [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=01e5ef9b-aef1-64ed-88e6-de74ea3e3e5b@rock-chips.com \
    --to=xxm@rock-chips.com \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=heiko@sntech.de \
    --cc=helgaas@kernel.org \
    --cc=jbx6244@gmail.com \
    --cc=kw@linux.com \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).