From: David Laight <David.Laight@ACULAB.COM>
To: 'Bjorn Helgaas' <helgaas@kernel.org>, Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
Cc: Xiaofei Tan <tanxiaofei@huawei.com>,
"rjw@rjwysocki.net" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
"lenb@kernel.org" <lenb@kernel.org>,
"bhelgaas@google.com" <bhelgaas@google.com>,
"linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-pci@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
"linuxarm@openeuler.org" <linuxarm@openeuler.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v2 04/15] ACPI: table: replace __attribute__((packed)) by __packed
Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2021 08:59:12 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <100f5a45dae14c77b341b7f1c5ea1db0@AcuMS.aculab.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210331172210.GA1397554@bjorn-Precision-5520>
From: Bjorn Helgaas
> Sent: 31 March 2021 18:22
>
> On Wed, Mar 31, 2021 at 11:55:08PM +0800, Zhang Rui wrote:
> > ...
>
> > From e18c942855e2f51e814d057fff4dd951cd0d0907 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > From: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
> > Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2021 20:34:13 +0800
> > Subject: [PATCH] ACPI: tables: FPDT: Fix 64bit alignment issue
> >
> > Some of the 64bit items in FPDT table may be 32bit aligned.
> > Using __attribute__((packed)) is not needed in this case, fixing it by
> > allowing 32bit alignment for these 64bit items.
>
> 1) Can you please add a spec reference for this? I think it's ACPI
> v6.3, sec 5.2.23.5, or something close to that.
>
> 2) The exact layout in memory is prescribed by the spec. I think
> that's basically what "packed" accomplishes. I don't understand
> why using "aligned" would be preferable. Using "aligned" means
> things can be at different offsets depending on the starting
> address of the structure. We always want the identical layout, no
> matter what the starting address is.
Both 'packed' and 'aligned(4)' remove any structure alignment
padding before 64bit items that aren't on an 8 byte boundary.
(Because everything else in the structures is naturally aligned.)
The difference is significant on cpu that don't support misaligned
addresses.
Assuming that the structure is always on a 4n byte boundary
(which the ACPI spec probably requires) accesses to the 32-bit
fields are always ok.
It is only 64-bit fields that must be accessed as two 32-bit
memory cycles, not all the fields using multiple single byte
cycles.
David
-
Registered Address Lakeside, Bramley Road, Mount Farm, Milton Keynes, MK1 1PT, UK
Registration No: 1397386 (Wales)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-04-01 9:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-03-27 7:46 [PATCH v2 00/15] acpi: fix some coding style issues Xiaofei Tan
2021-03-27 7:46 ` [PATCH v2 01/15] ACPI: APD: fix a block comment align issue Xiaofei Tan
2021-03-27 7:46 ` [PATCH v2 02/15] ACPI: processor: fix some coding style issues Xiaofei Tan
2021-03-27 7:46 ` [PATCH v2 03/15] ACPI: debug: " Xiaofei Tan
2021-03-27 7:46 ` [PATCH v2 04/15] ACPI: table: replace __attribute__((packed)) by __packed Xiaofei Tan
2021-03-29 10:09 ` David Laight
2021-03-30 2:23 ` Xiaofei Tan
2021-03-30 7:31 ` Zhang Rui
2021-03-30 7:59 ` Zhang Rui
2021-03-30 8:14 ` David Laight
2021-03-30 17:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2021-03-31 15:55 ` Zhang Rui
2021-03-31 16:14 ` David Laight
2021-03-31 17:22 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2021-04-01 8:59 ` David Laight [this message]
2021-04-01 13:49 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2021-04-01 14:23 ` David Laight
2021-04-01 17:29 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2021-03-27 7:46 ` [PATCH v2 05/15] ACPI: ipmi: remove useless return statement for void function Xiaofei Tan
2021-03-27 7:46 ` [PATCH v2 06/15] ACPI: LPSS: fix some coding style issues Xiaofei Tan
[not found] ` <CAHp75Vc+0hxLS_Ab7_VZfrG2jiQzvia9S=o+Gc+wg+vVk1Z39w@mail.gmail.com>
2021-03-27 9:55 ` Xiaofei Tan
[not found] ` <CAHp75Vd0hVqsfsZK=d1dz98Kbchqz-w4RqQQp6FwisxSGG5BzA@mail.gmail.com>
2021-03-27 9:58 ` Xiaofei Tan
2021-03-27 13:39 ` Joe Perches
2021-03-27 16:39 ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-03-27 7:46 ` [PATCH v2 07/15] ACPI: memhotplug: fix a coding style issue Xiaofei Tan
2021-03-27 7:46 ` [PATCH v2 08/15] ACPI: acpi_pad: " Xiaofei Tan
2021-03-27 7:46 ` [PATCH v2 09/15] ACPI: battery: fix some coding style issues Xiaofei Tan
2021-03-27 7:46 ` [PATCH v2 10/15] ACPI: button: " Xiaofei Tan
2021-03-27 7:46 ` [PATCH v2 11/15] ACPI: CPPC: " Xiaofei Tan
2021-03-27 7:46 ` [PATCH v2 12/15] ACPI: custom_method: fix a coding style issue Xiaofei Tan
2021-03-27 7:46 ` [PATCH v2 13/15] ACPI: PM: fix some coding style issues Xiaofei Tan
2021-03-27 7:46 ` [PATCH v2 14/15] ACPI: sysfs: " Xiaofei Tan
2021-03-27 7:46 ` [PATCH v2 15/15] ACPI: dock: " Xiaofei Tan
[not found] ` <CAHp75VcwuFYWRYfVPxbqa4TFGgqOhHc_soefmTAZcGGk3bLuhw@mail.gmail.com>
2021-03-27 10:00 ` [PATCH 00/15] acpi: " Xiaofei Tan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=100f5a45dae14c77b341b7f1c5ea1db0@AcuMS.aculab.com \
--to=david.laight@aculab.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=helgaas@kernel.org \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxarm@openeuler.org \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=rui.zhang@intel.com \
--cc=tanxiaofei@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).