From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_2 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65591C33CB1 for ; Wed, 15 Jan 2020 10:26:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D1AA2467E for ; Wed, 15 Jan 2020 10:26:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729631AbgAOK0c (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Jan 2020 05:26:32 -0500 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:60740 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1729751AbgAOK0c (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Jan 2020 05:26:32 -0500 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at test-mx.suse.de Received: from relay2.suse.de (unknown [195.135.220.254]) by mx2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A65EAC52; Wed, 15 Jan 2020 10:26:31 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <1579083986.15925.31.camel@suse.com> Subject: system generating an NMI due to 80696f991424d ("PCI: pciehp: Tolerate Presence Detect hardwired to zero") From: Oliver Neukum To: Lukas Wunner Cc: David Yang , Rajat Jain , Ashok Raj , linux-pci@vger.kernel.org Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2020 11:26:26 +0100 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.26.6 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-pci-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org Hi, I got a bug report about some systems generating an NMI and subsequently crashing bisected down to 80696f991424d. Apparently these systems do not react well to __pciehp_enable_slot while no card is present. Restoring the check to __pciehp_enable_slot() removed in 80696f991424d makes the current kernels work. What is to be done? Do you want a special case for the affected systems based on DMI, or should I revert 80696f991424d? Regards Oliver