linux-pci.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lukas Hartmann <lukas@mntmn.com>
To: Thinh Nguyen <thinh.nguyen@synopsys.com>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Lucas Stach <l.stach@pengutronix.de>,
	"linux-pci@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	John Youn <john.youn@synopsys.com>
Subject: Re: Linux Kernel Regression: HAPS quirk breaks PCIe on i.MX6QP
Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2019 09:05:53 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <16AAD0CF-D411-4880-BEE5-11A30F9B4886@mntmn.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <30102591E157244384E984126FC3CB4F639BECAB@us01wembx1.internal.synopsys.com>

Hi Thinh,

this is in a taped out i.MX6QP 1.2GHz SoC, I also confirmed it with the 1.0GHz version, it has the same 0xabcd device id integrated.

I will try your patch ASAP.

Cheers
Lukas

> On 1. Feb 2019, at 00:46, Thinh Nguyen <thinh.nguyen@synopsys.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi Lukas,
> 
> Thinh Nguyen wrote:
>> Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
>>> [+cc linux-pci, linux-kernel]
>>> 
>>>> On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 11:21 AM Lukas F. Hartmann <lukas@mntmn.com> wrote:
>>>> Hi Thinh,
>>>> 
>>>> I'm writing you because you're the author in this commit:
>>>> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__github.com_torvalds_linux_commit_03e6742584af8866ba014874669d0440bed3a623&d=DwIBaQ&c=DPL6_X_6JkXFx7AXWqB0tg&r=VKipRJmm95P2RbIxyKKYrcUCOGNlQtjlV-5zhrVhIik&m=2sOrowYXlsC3rl0LfHQhIZzImag0jFZXGvR6NIQDsh8&s=oJoBWRE8_LGAYbX2alh6QnjYZTTmzcgLw4MtOMToNyo&e=
>>>> 
>>>> This quirk workaround breaks the PCIe on i.MX6QP, at least on my test
>>>> devices. The reason is because the Synposys PCIe IP in i.MX6QP has the
>>>> same device ID as the HAPS USB3 controller you are targeting in the
>>>> commit: 0xabcd.
>>>> 
>>>> Definition:
>>>> 
>>>> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__github.com_torvalds_linux_blob_master_include_linux_pci-5Fids.h-23L2364&d=DwIBaQ&c=DPL6_X_6JkXFx7AXWqB0tg&r=VKipRJmm95P2RbIxyKKYrcUCOGNlQtjlV-5zhrVhIik&m=2sOrowYXlsC3rl0LfHQhIZzImag0jFZXGvR6NIQDsh8&s=-FVCwe81XNjJsYHYk1w-kdAzSOLunTGeNc73azO2QYw&e=
>>>> 
>>>> Here is a bit of lspci output on my i.MX6QP machine (without the problem):
>>>> 
>>>> mntmn@reform:~/code/linux$ lspci -v
>>>> 00:00.0 PCI bridge: Synopsys, Inc. Device abcd (rev 01) (prog-if 00
>>>>                                          ^^^^
>>>> [Normal decode])
>>>>        Flags: bus master, fast devsel, latency 0, IRQ 307
>>>>        Memory at 01000000 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=1M]
>>>>        Bus: primary=00, secondary=01, subordinate=ff, sec-latency=0
>>>> ...
>>>> 
>>>> The failure mode is that the PCIe controller shows up as a USB
>>>> controller and my ath9k wireless PCIe card cannot be assigned the
>>>> proper resources anymore (-ENOMEM even for very small BARs).
>>>> 
>>>> Reverting this commit fixes the problem for me. I suggest to make the
>>>> check more specific to the platform/chipset you are targeting.
>>> So Synopsys apparently re-used Device ID 0xabcd?  That's a pretty bad problem.
>>> 
>>> It looks like we merged 03e6742584af ("PCI: Override Synopsys USB 3.x
>>> HAPS device class") for v5.0, and v5.0-final hasn't been released yet,
>>> so if we don't hear from Thinh with a resolution, we can still revert
>>> it.
>>> 
>>> I set myself a reminder to revert this on Feb 11, but hopefully we'll
>>> have a better resolution before then.
>>> 
>>> Bjorn
>>> 
>> This is really odd that the PID for the PCIe controller in i.MX6QP is
>> the same as PID Synopsys use for USB controller. We use a different set
>> of PIDs for PCIe controllers and track VID and PID in our releases.
>> 
>> Is the Root Complex (00:00.0) part of the SoC? Or is this a Synopsys
>> prototype connected to your board? If it is the latter, then the FPGA
>> configuration needs to be updated to other PID.
>> 
>> We're investigating the workaround in case this is on a taped-out SoC.
> 
> Can you try to see if this will help?
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/quirks.c b/drivers/pci/quirks.c
> index b0a413f3f7ca..64623fbdd1e5 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/quirks.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/quirks.c
> @@ -629,6 +629,9 @@ static void quirk_synopsys_haps(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> {
>        u32 class = pdev->class;
> 
> +       if (class != PCI_CLASS_SERIAL_USB_XHCI)
> +               return;
> +
>        switch (pdev->device) {
>        case PCI_DEVICE_ID_SYNOPSYS_HAPSUSB3:
>        case PCI_DEVICE_ID_SYNOPSYS_HAPSUSB3_AXI:
> 
> Thanks,
> Thinh
> 
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2019-02-01  8:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <87o97wrbef.fsf@mntmn.com>
2019-01-31 21:49 ` Linux Kernel Regression: HAPS quirk breaks PCIe on i.MX6QP Bjorn Helgaas
2019-01-31 22:50   ` Thinh Nguyen
2019-01-31 23:46     ` Thinh Nguyen
2019-02-01  8:05       ` Lukas Hartmann [this message]
2019-02-01 20:22         ` Thinh Nguyen
2019-02-01  8:59       ` Lukas Wunner
2019-02-01 20:27         ` Thinh Nguyen
2019-02-05 20:09           ` Bjorn Helgaas
2019-02-05 20:38             ` Thinh Nguyen
2019-02-05 20:59               ` Bjorn Helgaas
2019-02-05 21:02                 ` Thinh Nguyen
2019-02-05 21:33                   ` Thinh Nguyen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=16AAD0CF-D411-4880-BEE5-11A30F9B4886@mntmn.com \
    --to=lukas@mntmn.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=john.youn@synopsys.com \
    --cc=l.stach@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=thinh.nguyen@synopsys.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).