From: Liviu Dudau <Liviu.Dudau@arm.com>
To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com>
Cc: Lorenzo Pieralisi <Lorenzo.Pieralisi@arm.com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"linux-pci@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
Krzysztof Halasa <khalasa@piap.pl>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
Phil Edworthy <phil.edworthy@renesas.com>,
Jingoo Han <jg1.han@samsung.com>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
Mohit Kumar <mohit.kumar@st.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/2] arm: pcibios: remove pci_sys_data domain
Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2014 17:39:15 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20141030173914.GS1069@e106497-lin.cambridge.arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20141030170305.GE26820@obsidianresearch.com>
On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 05:03:05PM +0000, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 04:52:46PM +0000, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 04:25:52PM +0000, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > > On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 11:44:46AM +0000, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> > >
> > > > Code in drivers/pci/pci-mvebu.c has been changed to add a domain
> > > > number to PCI resources by using the nr value coming from the setup
> > > > pcibios32 callback, which may not be correct and should be considered
> > > > a temporary solution waiting for review comments.
> > >
> > > The intent of the string was to have the domain number so that
> > > resources in /proc/iomem can be correlated with lspci.
> > >
> > > This would be a 'best practice' - all PCI drivers need to request
> > > resource, and the resource should be relatable back to the PCI
> > > domain... So it would be best if the domain number was available at
> > > this point in a driver's flow.
> >
> > It is not available with the new approach and the generic PCI domains since
> > the set-up hook is called before creating the pci_bus. That's why
> > I mentioned that in the cover letter, and that's good it caught your
> > attention.
> >
> > On a side note, when the resources are parsed from DT ranges, ie in:
> >
> > of_pci_get_host_bridge_resources()
> >
> > the resources won't contain the domain number you are looking for here, for
> > the records, so we'd better find an agreement sooner rather than later.
>
> Well, it is very unfortunate that things are globally not sequenced to
> allow proper resource names :(
But of_pci_get_host_bridge_resources() does not request the resources, it only
creates them out of the DT ranges. If/when the driver decides the list of
resources is correct and it can work with it can also request them and use
whatever domain number allocation strategy it wants (auto-incrementing or DT
based). So I don't think the global sequencing is broken here.
Best regards,
Liviu
>
> But it also isn't really a big deal in the grand scheme of
> things. Maybe it can be fixed later :|
>
> > So basically I could go as far as sticking 0000 to the string given the
> > current code. I did not drop the 0x04x entirely since I do not want to break
> > userspace, I was tempted though, let me know if I am allowed to do that.
>
> I'd just drop it entirely then, nobody is going to parse /proc/iomem
>
> Jason
>
--
====================
| I would like to |
| fix the world, |
| but they're not |
| giving me the |
\ source code! /
---------------
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-10-30 17:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-10-30 11:44 [RFC PATCH 0/2] arm: pcibios: remove pci_sys_data domain Lorenzo Pieralisi
2014-10-30 11:44 ` [RFC PATCH 1/2] arm: cns3xxx: pci: remove artificial dependency on " Lorenzo Pieralisi
2014-11-01 12:32 ` Michał Mirosław
2014-11-03 10:09 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-10-30 11:44 ` [RFC PATCH 2/2] arm: pcibios: move to generic PCI domains Lorenzo Pieralisi
2014-10-30 11:55 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-10-30 16:20 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2014-10-30 12:27 ` Yijing Wang
2014-10-30 16:21 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2014-10-31 13:43 ` Phil Edworthy
2014-10-31 16:37 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2014-10-31 17:04 ` Phil Edworthy
2014-11-03 23:26 ` Simon Horman
2014-11-04 11:44 ` Liviu Dudau
2014-11-03 11:06 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2014-11-03 1:18 ` Jingoo Han
2014-11-03 2:36 ` Karicheri, Muralidharan
2014-11-03 11:23 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2014-11-03 11:33 ` Lucas Stach
2014-11-03 12:13 ` Jingoo Han
2014-11-03 3:48 ` Yijing Wang
2014-11-03 10:49 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2014-10-30 16:25 ` [RFC PATCH 0/2] arm: pcibios: remove pci_sys_data domain Jason Gunthorpe
2014-10-30 16:52 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2014-10-30 17:03 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2014-10-30 17:39 ` Liviu Dudau [this message]
2014-10-30 17:45 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2014-10-30 18:09 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2014-10-30 18:42 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2014-10-30 19:21 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-10-30 19:35 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2014-10-30 20:03 ` Arnd Bergmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20141030173914.GS1069@e106497-lin.cambridge.arm.com \
--to=liviu.dudau@arm.com \
--cc=Lorenzo.Pieralisi@arm.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=jg1.han@samsung.com \
--cc=jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com \
--cc=khalasa@piap.pl \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=mohit.kumar@st.com \
--cc=phil.edworthy@renesas.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).