linux-pci.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
To: Paul Menzel <pmenzel+linux-pci@molgen.mpg.de>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>, Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org>
Subject: Re: pciehp 0000:00:1c.0:pcie004: Timeout on hotplug command 0x1038 (issued 65284 msec ago)
Date: Thu, 3 May 2018 21:45:27 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180504024527.GE15790@bhelgaas-glaptop.roam.corp.google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <43b8ab4a-f8ee-dc96-40ec-e6fdfedd8309@molgen.mpg.de>

On Thu, May 03, 2018 at 10:49:24AM +0200, Paul Menzel wrote:
> On 04/27/18 21:22, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > [+cc Lukas, Sinan]
> 
> > On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 12:17:53PM +0200, Paul Menzel wrote:
> 
> > > On the Lenovo X60t, during resume from ACPI suspend and during shutdown, the
> > > message below is shown in the logs.
> > > 
> > >      pciehp 0000:00:1c.0:pcie004: Timeout on hotplug command 0x1038 (issued
> > > 65284 msec ago)
> > 
> > This is an Intel root port:
> > 
> >    00:1c.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corporation NM10/ICH7 Family PCI Express Port 1 (rev 02) (prog-if 00 [Normal decode])
> > 
> > and probably has the CF118 erratum (see
> > http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=3461a068661c
> > for details).  I bet if you changed "msecs" in pcie_wait_cmd() to 30000
> > you'd see a 30 second delay during shutdown because we write a command to
> > tell the port not to generate any more hotplug interrupts, and we wait for
> > that command to complete, but the port never tells us it has completed.
> > 
> > Lukas reported a similar issue in
> > https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180112104929.GA10599@wunner.de, which we sort
> > of worked around by assuming that Thunderbolt controllers never support
> > that "command complete" interrupt (see
> > http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=493fb50e958c)
> > 
> > Sinan mooted the idea of using a "no-wait" path of sending the "don't
> > generate hotplug interrupts" command.  I think we should work on this
> > idea a little more.  If we're shutting down the whole system, I can't
> > believe there's much value in *anything* we do in the pciehp_remove()
> > path.
> > 
> > Maybe we should just get rid of pciehp_remove() (and probably
> > pcie_port_remove_service() and the other service driver remove methods)
> > completely.  That dates from when the service drivers could be modules that
> > could be potentially unloaded, but unloading them hasn't been possible for
> > years.
> > 
> > As far as the resume path, my guess is that in pciehp_resume(), we
> > write a command to enable interrupts, then it looks like we get a
> > PCI_EXP_SLTSTA_DLLSC "Link Up" interrupt, and apparently we issue
> > another command.  Not sure exactly what's going on here.

> Thank you for the quick reply and sorry for only being able to test it now.
> Please find the relevant bits from the ACPI S3 suspend “action” below. The
> full log is attached.

No problem.  I think we need to bite the bullet and just do a quirk
for the Intel erratum.  I tried to avoid it by waiting for command
completion lazily, but I think that ended up being unnecessarily
clever and it didn't even solve the whole problem.

Can you try the patch below?  I think it should solve the problem
you're seeing.


commit ec48a1e0b91ce68903c8ea4dce659d4fdf17ad06
Author: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Date:   Thu May 3 18:39:38 2018 -0500

    PCI: pciehp: Add quirk for Intel Command Completed erratum
    
    The Intel CF118 erratum means the controller does not set the Command
    Completed bit unless writes to the Slot Command register change "Control"
    bits.  Command Completed is never set for writes that only change software
    notification "Enable" bits.  This results in timeouts like this:
    
      pciehp 0000:00:1c.0:pcie004: Timeout on hotplug command 0x1038 (issued 65284 msec ago)
    
    When this erratum is present, avoid these timeouts by marking commands
    "completed" immediately unless they change the "Control" bits.
    
    Here's the text of the erratum from the Intel document:
    
      CF118        PCIe Slot Status Register Command Completed bit not always
                   updated on any configuration write to the Slot Control
                   Register
    
      Problem:     For PCIe root ports (devices 0 - 10) supporting hot-plug,
                   the Slot Status Register (offset AAh) Command Completed
                   (bit[4]) status is updated under the following condition:
                   IOH will set Command Completed bit after delivering the new
                   commands written in the Slot Controller register (offset
                   A8h) to VPP. The IOH detects new commands written in Slot
                   Control register by checking the change of value for Power
                   Controller Control (bit[10]), Power Indicator Control
                   (bits[9:8]), Attention Indicator Control (bits[7:6]), or
                   Electromechanical Interlock Control (bit[11]) fields. Any
                   other configuration writes to the Slot Control register
                   without changing the values of these fields will not cause
                   Command Completed bit to be set.
    
                   The PCIe Base Specification Revision 2.0 or later describes
                   the “Slot Control Register” in section 7.8.10, as follows
                   (Reference section 7.8.10, Slot Control Register, Offset
                   18h). In hot-plug capable Downstream Ports, a write to the
                   Slot Control register must cause a hot-plug command to be
                   generated (see Section 6.7.3.2 for details on hot-plug
                   commands). A write to the Slot Control register in a
                   Downstream Port that is not hotplug capable must not cause a
                   hot-plug command to be executed.
    
                   The PCIe Spec intended that every write to the Slot Control
                   Register is a command and expected a command complete status
                   to abstract the VPP implementation specific nuances from the
                   OS software. IOH PCIe Slot Control Register implementation
                   is not fully conforming to the PCIe Specification in this
                   respect.
    
      Implication: Software checking on the Command Completed status after
                   writing to the Slot Control register may time out.
    
      Workaround:  Software can read the Slot Control register and compare the
                   existing and new values to determine if it should check the
                   Command Completed status after writing to the Slot Control
                   register.
    
    Link: http://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/processors/xeon/xeon-e7-v2-spec-update.html
    Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/8770820b-85a0-172b-7230-3a44524e6c9f@molgen.mpg.de
    Reported-by: Paul Menzel <pmenzel+linux-pci@molgen.mpg.de>
    Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>

diff --git a/drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp.h b/drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp.h
index c27aab8e25d7..eefffff8e403 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp.h
+++ b/drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp.h
@@ -83,6 +83,7 @@ struct controller {
 	struct timer_list poll_timer;
 	unsigned long cmd_started;	/* jiffies */
 	unsigned int cmd_busy:1;
+	unsigned int cc_erratum:1;
 	unsigned int link_active_reporting:1;
 	unsigned int notification_enabled:1;
 	unsigned int power_fault_detected:1;
diff --git a/drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp_hpc.c b/drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp_hpc.c
index 18a42f8f5dc5..aba67d16484a 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp_hpc.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp_hpc.c
@@ -10,7 +10,6 @@
  * All rights reserved.
  *
  * Send feedback to <greg@kroah.com>,<kristen.c.accardi@intel.com>
- *
  */
 
 #include <linux/kernel.h>
@@ -147,25 +146,27 @@ static void pcie_wait_cmd(struct controller *ctrl)
 	else
 		rc = pcie_poll_cmd(ctrl, jiffies_to_msecs(timeout));
 
-	/*
-	 * Controllers with errata like Intel CF118 don't generate
-	 * completion notifications unless the power/indicator/interlock
-	 * control bits are changed.  On such controllers, we'll emit this
-	 * timeout message when we wait for completion of commands that
-	 * don't change those bits, e.g., commands that merely enable
-	 * interrupts.
-	 */
 	if (!rc)
 		ctrl_info(ctrl, "Timeout on hotplug command %#06x (issued %u msec ago)\n",
 			  ctrl->slot_ctrl,
 			  jiffies_to_msecs(jiffies - ctrl->cmd_started));
 }
 
+/*
+ * The Intel CF118 erratum means the Command Completed bit is only set if a
+ * Slot Control write changes PCI_EXP_SLTCTL_PCC, PCI_EXP_SLTCTL_PIC,
+ * PCI_EXP_SLTCTL_AIC, or PCI_EXP_SLTCTL_EIC.
+ */
+#define CC_ERRATUM_MASK		(PCI_EXP_SLTCTL_PCC |	\
+				 PCI_EXP_SLTCTL_PIC |	\
+				 PCI_EXP_SLTCTL_AIC |	\
+				 PCI_EXP_SLTCTL_EIC)
+
 static void pcie_do_write_cmd(struct controller *ctrl, u16 cmd,
 			      u16 mask, bool wait)
 {
 	struct pci_dev *pdev = ctrl_dev(ctrl);
-	u16 slot_ctrl;
+	u16 slot_ctrl_orig, slot_ctrl;
 
 	mutex_lock(&ctrl->ctrl_lock);
 
@@ -180,6 +181,7 @@ static void pcie_do_write_cmd(struct controller *ctrl, u16 cmd,
 		goto out;
 	}
 
+	slot_ctrl_orig = slot_ctrl;
 	slot_ctrl &= ~mask;
 	slot_ctrl |= (cmd & mask);
 	ctrl->cmd_busy = 1;
@@ -188,6 +190,10 @@ static void pcie_do_write_cmd(struct controller *ctrl, u16 cmd,
 	ctrl->cmd_started = jiffies;
 	ctrl->slot_ctrl = slot_ctrl;
 
+	if (ctrl->cc_erratum &&
+	    (slot_ctrl_orig & CC_ERRATUM_MASK) == (slot_ctrl & CC_ERRATUM_MASK))
+		ctrl->cmd_busy = 0;
+
 	/*
 	 * Optionally wait for the hardware to be ready for a new command,
 	 * indicating completion of the above issued command.
@@ -840,6 +846,10 @@ struct controller *pcie_init(struct pcie_device *dev)
 	if (pdev->is_thunderbolt)
 		slot_cap |= PCI_EXP_SLTCAP_NCCS;
 
+	/* Assume all Intel controllers have erratum CF118 */
+	if (pdev->vendor == PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL)
+		ctrl->cc_erratum = 1;
+
 	ctrl->slot_cap = slot_cap;
 	mutex_init(&ctrl->ctrl_lock);
 	init_waitqueue_head(&ctrl->queue);
@@ -861,7 +871,7 @@ struct controller *pcie_init(struct pcie_device *dev)
 		PCI_EXP_SLTSTA_MRLSC | PCI_EXP_SLTSTA_CC |
 		PCI_EXP_SLTSTA_DLLSC);
 
-	ctrl_info(ctrl, "Slot #%d AttnBtn%c PwrCtrl%c MRL%c AttnInd%c PwrInd%c HotPlug%c Surprise%c Interlock%c NoCompl%c LLActRep%c\n",
+	ctrl_info(ctrl, "Slot #%d AttnBtn%c PwrCtrl%c MRL%c AttnInd%c PwrInd%c HotPlug%c Surprise%c Interlock%c NoCompl%c%s LLActRep%c\n",
 		(slot_cap & PCI_EXP_SLTCAP_PSN) >> 19,
 		FLAG(slot_cap, PCI_EXP_SLTCAP_ABP),
 		FLAG(slot_cap, PCI_EXP_SLTCAP_PCP),
@@ -872,6 +882,7 @@ struct controller *pcie_init(struct pcie_device *dev)
 		FLAG(slot_cap, PCI_EXP_SLTCAP_HPS),
 		FLAG(slot_cap, PCI_EXP_SLTCAP_EIP),
 		FLAG(slot_cap, PCI_EXP_SLTCAP_NCCS),
+		ctrl->cc_erratum? " (with CC erratum)" : "",
 		FLAG(link_cap, PCI_EXP_LNKCAP_DLLLARC));
 
 	if (pcie_init_slot(ctrl))

  reply	other threads:[~2018-05-04  2:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-04-26 10:17 Paul Menzel
2018-04-27 19:22 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2018-04-27 19:34   ` Sinan Kaya
2018-04-27 21:12     ` Bjorn Helgaas
2018-04-28  0:56       ` Dave Young
2018-04-28  1:18         ` Dave Young
2018-04-28 13:03           ` okaya
2018-04-30 20:48             ` Sinan Kaya
2018-04-30 21:17               ` Bjorn Helgaas
2018-04-30 21:27                 ` Sinan Kaya
2018-04-30 21:38                   ` Lukas Wunner
2018-05-01 12:38                   ` Sinan Kaya
2018-05-01 12:59                     ` Marc Zyngier
2018-05-01 13:25                       ` Bjorn Helgaas
2018-05-01 16:31                         ` Marc Zyngier
2018-05-01 22:32                           ` Eric W. Biederman
2018-05-03  8:49   ` Paul Menzel
2018-05-04  2:45     ` Bjorn Helgaas [this message]
2018-05-04  6:37       ` okaya
2018-05-04 13:33         ` Bjorn Helgaas
2018-05-04 14:24           ` okaya
2018-05-06  9:35           ` Paul Menzel
2018-05-07 21:33           ` Bjorn Helgaas
2018-05-08  6:59             ` Paul Menzel
2018-05-08 12:34               ` Bjorn Helgaas
2018-05-08 13:22                 ` Paul Menzel
2018-05-09 11:41   ` Lukas Wunner
2018-05-09 12:57     ` Bjorn Helgaas
2018-05-09 13:16       ` Lukas Wunner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180504024527.GE15790@bhelgaas-glaptop.roam.corp.google.com \
    --to=helgaas@kernel.org \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lukas@wunner.de \
    --cc=okaya@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=pmenzel+linux-pci@molgen.mpg.de \
    --subject='Re: pciehp 0000:00:1c.0:pcie004: Timeout on hotplug command 0x1038 (issued 65284 msec ago)' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).