linux-pci.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
Cc: "Woods, Brian" <Brian.Woods@amd.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	"x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>,
	Clemens Ladisch <clemens@ladisch.de>,
	Jean Delvare <jdelvare@suse.com>,
	Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>, Pu Wen <puwen@hygon.cn>,
	Jia Zhang <qianyue.zj@alibaba-inc.com>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org" <linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-pci@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] x86/amd_nb: add support for newer PCI topologies
Date: Sat, 3 Nov 2018 00:29:48 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181102232948.GC26770@zn.tnic> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181102195925.GB160487@google.com>

On Fri, Nov 02, 2018 at 02:59:25PM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> This isn't my code, and I'm not really objecting to these changes, but
> from where I sit, the fact that you need this sort of vendor-specific
> topology discovery is a little bit ugly and seems like something of a
> maintenance issue.  You could argue that this is sort of an "AMD CPU
> driver", which is entitled to be device-specific, and that does make
> some sense.

It is a bunch of glue code which enumerates the PCI devices a CPU
has and other in-kernel users can use that instead of doing the
discovery/enumeration themselves.

> But device-specific code is typically packaged as a driver that uses
> driver registration interfaces like acpi_bus_register_driver(),
> pci_register_driver(), etc.  That gives you a consistent structure
> and, more importantly, a framework for dealing with hotplug.  It
> doesn't look like amd_nb.c would deal well with hot-add of CPUs.

If you mean physical hotadd, then that's a non-issue as, AFAIK, AMD
doesn't support that.

Now, TBH I've never tried soft-offlining the cores of a node and then
check whether using the PCI devices of that node would work.

Now, I don't mind this getting converted to a proper PCI driver as long
as it is not a module as it has to be present at all times. Other than
that, I'm a happy camper.

Thx.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.

  reply	other threads:[~2018-11-02 23:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-11-02 18:11 [PATCH 0/4] Update DF/SMN access and k10temp for AMD F17h M30h Woods, Brian
2018-11-02 18:11 ` [PATCH 1/4] k10temp: x86/amd_nb: consolidate shared device IDs Woods, Brian
2018-11-02 18:24   ` Guenter Roeck
2018-11-02 18:11 ` [PATCH 2/4] x86/amd_nb: add support for newer PCI topologies Woods, Brian
2018-11-02 19:59   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2018-11-02 23:29     ` Borislav Petkov [this message]
2018-11-05 21:45       ` Bjorn Helgaas
2018-11-05 21:56         ` Borislav Petkov
2018-11-06 21:42           ` Bjorn Helgaas
2018-11-06 22:00             ` Borislav Petkov
2018-11-06 23:20               ` Bjorn Helgaas
2018-11-07  9:18                 ` Borislav Petkov
2018-11-07 13:38                   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2018-11-07 16:07                     ` Borislav Petkov
2018-11-07 17:10                       ` Bjorn Helgaas
2018-11-07 17:17                         ` Borislav Petkov
2018-11-07 19:50                       ` Woods, Brian
2018-11-07 13:51                   ` Guenter Roeck
2018-11-07 17:16                     ` Bjorn Helgaas
2018-11-07 19:15                 ` Srinivas Pandruvada
2018-11-07 21:31                   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2018-11-07 22:42                     ` Srinivas Pandruvada
2018-11-07 23:14                       ` Bjorn Helgaas
2018-11-07 23:30                         ` Srinivas Pandruvada
2018-11-07 23:44                           ` Srinivas Pandruvada
2018-11-08  1:40                         ` Guenter Roeck
2018-11-08 13:59                           ` Bjorn Helgaas
2018-11-05 19:38   ` Borislav Petkov
2018-11-05 20:33     ` Woods, Brian
2018-11-05 21:42       ` Borislav Petkov
2018-11-05 23:32         ` Woods, Brian
2018-11-06  8:27           ` Borislav Petkov
2018-11-02 18:11 ` [PATCH 3/4] x86/amd_nb: add PCI device IDs for F17h M30h Woods, Brian
2018-11-02 18:11 ` [PATCH 4/4] hwmon: k10temp: add support for AMD F17h M30h CPUs Woods, Brian
2018-11-02 18:26   ` Guenter Roeck
2018-11-05 20:32   ` Borislav Petkov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20181102232948.GC26770@zn.tnic \
    --to=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=Brian.Woods@amd.com \
    --cc=clemens@ladisch.de \
    --cc=helgaas@kernel.org \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=jdelvare@suse.com \
    --cc=linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=puwen@hygon.cn \
    --cc=qianyue.zj@alibaba-inc.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).