linux-pci.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Bogendoerfer <tbogendoerfer@suse.de>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	James Hogan <jhogan@kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
	Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>,
	Paul Burton <paul.burton@mips.com>,
	Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/7] MIPS: SGI-IP27: use generic PCI driver
Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2019 11:58:07 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190218115807.1a683d2c6824acd4ea78eb11@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190128133215.GC744@infradead.org>

On Mon, 28 Jan 2019 05:32:15 -0800
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> wrote:

> Note that we could probably fix these by just switching IP27 and
> other users of the bridge chip to use the dma_pfn_offset field
> in struct device and stop overriding these functions.

during my final round of tests for v2 of the patchset I found a problem with
the current implementation regarding dma_pfn_offset. Right now it asumes that
dma addresses are lower than physical addresses, which probably came from the
sh7786 usage (at least that's how I understand the SH7786 datasheet). But for
IP27 physical addresses starts at 0 and dma address is more at the end of the
64bit address space. So using following patch gets it right for IP27:

diff --git a/include/linux/dma-direct.h b/include/linux/dma-direct.h
index b7338702592a..19dfadc292f5 100644
--- a/include/linux/dma-direct.h
+++ b/include/linux/dma-direct.h
@@ -12,14 +12,14 @@ static inline dma_addr_t __phys_to_dma(struct device *dev, phys_addr_t paddr)
 {
        dma_addr_t dev_addr = (dma_addr_t)paddr;
 
-       return dev_addr - ((dma_addr_t)dev->dma_pfn_offset << PAGE_SHIFT);
+       return dev_addr + ((dma_addr_t)dev->dma_pfn_offset << PAGE_SHIFT);
 }
 
 static inline phys_addr_t __dma_to_phys(struct device *dev, dma_addr_t dev_addr)
 {
        phys_addr_t paddr = (phys_addr_t)dev_addr;
 
-       return paddr + ((phys_addr_t)dev->dma_pfn_offset << PAGE_SHIFT);
+       return paddr - ((phys_addr_t)dev->dma_pfn_offset << PAGE_SHIFT);
 }
 
 static inline bool dma_capable(struct device *dev, dma_addr_t addr, size_t size)

This of course will break SH7786. To fix both cases how about making dma_pfn_offset
a signed long ?

Thomas.

-- 
SUSE Linux GmbH
GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton
HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)

  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-02-18 10:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-01-24 17:47 [PATCH 0/7] MIPS: SGI-IP27 rework Thomas Bogendoerfer
2019-01-24 17:47 ` [PATCH 1/7] MIPS: SGI-IP27: get rid of volatile and hubreg_t Thomas Bogendoerfer
2019-01-24 17:47 ` [PATCH 2/7] MIPS: SGI-IP27: clean up bridge access and header files Thomas Bogendoerfer
2019-01-28 13:20   ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-01-28 13:24     ` Thomas Bogendoerfer
2019-01-28 13:33       ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-01-24 17:47 ` [PATCH 3/7] MIPS: SGI-IP27: use pr_info/pr_emerg and pr_cont to fix output Thomas Bogendoerfer
2019-01-24 17:47 ` [PATCH 4/7] MIPS: SGI-IP27: do xtalk scanning later Thomas Bogendoerfer
2019-01-24 17:47 ` [PATCH 5/7] MIPS: SGI-IP27: rework HUB interrupts Thomas Bogendoerfer
2019-01-28 13:26   ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-01-24 17:47 ` [PATCH 6/7] MIPS: SGI-IP27: use generic PCI driver Thomas Bogendoerfer
2019-01-28 13:32   ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-01-29 15:24     ` Thomas Bogendoerfer
2019-01-30  9:17       ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-01-30 17:25         ` Thomas Bogendoerfer
2019-01-30 17:28           ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-02-18 10:58     ` Thomas Bogendoerfer [this message]
2019-02-20 15:10       ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-02-20 15:20         ` Thomas Bogendoerfer
2019-01-24 17:47 ` [PATCH 7/7] MIPS: SGI-IP27: abstract chipset irq from bridge Thomas Bogendoerfer
2019-01-28 13:33   ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-01-28 14:01     ` Thomas Bogendoerfer
2019-01-28 16:27       ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-02-01 14:37         ` Thomas Bogendoerfer

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190218115807.1a683d2c6824acd4ea78eb11@suse.de \
    --to=tbogendoerfer@suse.de \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=jhogan@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mips@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
    --cc=paul.burton@mips.com \
    --cc=ralf@linux-mips.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).